Replies

But the 'bots will declare any non-action by Trump a win, and label any critic ever Trump. It seems we need a new label for those who clearly recognize the threats, but also realize a charlatan is performing on stage. It's sort of pity, because now in addition to qook threads, poor FR is infested with bots constantly whipping up support for their favorite media host.

How about 'Realists'? I'm going to attempt to outline the basic position of realists; others are welcome to amend as they see fit. Realists:

1. Recognize danger when good men are willing to trade liberty and freedom for safety while enemies attack the very basis of government.
2. Understand the founders - with only 1/3 support - based their decisions to rebel against tyranny not on precedent but faith and resolve.
3. Applaud Lincoln who - with only 1/3 support - utilized unique interpretations of the constitution to validate support for the union.
4. Realize that Trump - with 1/2 support - has a 225 year basis of precedent of multiple avenues of action - including calling out the militia - to suppress rebellion in states, departments and agencies engaged in insurrection, mutiny and treason.
5. Clearly see that Trump will not take those many and varied actions required to restore the republic, thus condemning hundreds of millions to future civil conflicts as the USA passes on the world state as a global leader.

Unlike never Trumpers, realists don't care if Trump is crude, remarked that powerful men could grab women by the pvssy, marry, divorce and upgrade to beautiful younger women, or exhibit any other social faux paus. What realists despise is the manipulation of Trump's base of supporters as if they are carnival rubes. Realists tire of the sad bunch of characters who, ignorant of history, of tradition, of movements, applaud their favorite as the very foundation crumbles around them.