Comrade Kruchev, uh, Castro, pounds table, should go pound sand............
Castro made this bizarre statement, to try to bend over backwards to prove that he is liberal on “transgender” issues.
And in his zeal to do so, used incorrect terminology which nobody in the liberal world has called him out on.
Julian, maybe you need to take an online Biology Class.
You can even do it for free; so to speak.
What exactly is reproductive justice? The crowd cheered for that statement. But what does that really mean?
Hoolian advocating for men to have the right to an abortion was the highlight of the first debate. Honk Honk!!
As a former RAT myself all I can say after watching two nights of this clown show is what a f**ked up royal mess that party is. They’re a million dumpster fires going off all at once!
Another DEMAND from a detached from reality d’rat? Go figure.
DEPOPULATE Castros, Clintons, liars, looters from the body politic.
live - free - republic
Bookmark
A fine example of the average Democrat — an a-hole.
There may still be seats available in the 2020 dhimmicrat clown car, though space IS limited!
I think what he means that if a biological man who chooses to be a woman also chooses to have an abortion, they should first be provided with a child by the government for that purpose. They should be able to adopt and then abort because that’s not just a reproductive right, it’s reproductive justice.
Well, I guess that locks down the “pregnant trans men” demographic for him.
I’ve suggested before that Democrats come of with a word that means “person with a womb”, or “person with body parts for bearing children”. It would make communication so much easier, since child bearing is such an integral and essential part of the human experience. If only there were a word like that!
Maybe if their best minds worked long and hard on it, they might come up with something.
Forget the taxpayers. I’ll personally pay for any transgender female that needs an abortion. I’m just that generous.
To stupid to even comment on it but yet in liberal states they’re putting feminine hygiene products in boys restrooms.
This could be extremely costly is that it would involve a huge medical investment to allow the trans-woman to conceive a child before one killed the child.
It is much more cheaper, and philosophically sound, to support Tlaib’s call for “direct reparations” for slavery (I can agree that slavery is a bad thing—why one should go to great lengths to conceive a child only to kill it is a little beyond me, but I admit I have not fully fathomed the leftist mind), though at first glance one might be equally puzzled as to why any rational person would think this should involve an expenditure of money.
As a government program, “direct reparations” would undoubtedly be costly, even though it would seem that all antebellum (and bellum) slaves are likely dead. One would need people to administer the program, which costs money, and government programs almost always have a certain amount of mistakes/fraud built in which are part of the cost of using the government to do business—undoubtedly some applications for reparations would be approved. Still, I think conservatives should pile on to this provided that it is done with appropriate funding mechanisms—
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3759384/posts?page=65#65
(see also post 71 of that thread.
Everything the Dems promise is impossible. They could promise everyone free green cheese from the moon and nobody on the stage would bat an eye.
Lemme guess: A biological female who identifies as a “man who Identifies as a woman”?
I think this idiot has achieved trans-inception...