Posted on 05/29/2019 8:30:10 AM PDT by Hojczyk
If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. We did not however make a determination if the president did commit a crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Democrats will impeach him after this..
Ah, as we all know: slime oozes.
QED
LOL. The ultimate mealy-mouthed non-statement. Basically, “we found no evidence, but I didn’t want to clear him.” This is the exact inverse of the Comey Hillary Clinton statement: “We found all sorts of evidence, but she didn’t mean to do anything, so we are clearing her.”
Can’t prove a negative, Bob.
No, they likely won’t have the votes, even in the House. But try they will. And that’ll actually work to POTUS’ advantage.
Trying to shift attention away from investigating the investigators
He read the headline that was written for him! That’s all they needed.
What the hell kind of double talk is this???
Mueller sickens me........
.....now the hate Trump ......crowd, the uglies, ie Napolitano, Hume, etc are on TV crowing impeachment.
THAT was the sole object with this little stunt. I almost don’t care, except maybe NOW Mueller will STFU
He has had it as may ways as there are grains of sand!
He did more with so little, than a monkey does with a peanut. (And PUT it in all the same places)
Now it’s time for him to STFU and go away
Some people are getting very scared. Nothing about this is normal.
Mueller submitted his report. If he had anything to say or any evidence that was the time!
If we had confidence the president DID NOT commit a crime we would have said so. You cannot prove a negative!
We are living in interesting times.
Why not? Cause you could not:-)
THAT was the sole object with this little stunt. I almost don’t care, except maybe NOW Mueller will STFU
He has had it as may ways as there are grains of sand!
He did more with so little, than a monkey does with a peanut. (And PUT it in all the same places)
Now it’s time for him to STFU and go away
BS. He is supposed to refer if he sees a crime. There is no in between. That is NOT the standard by which he operates.
"We are sure there is a crime there. We just could not find it so we had to not say it..." Complete and total BS.
Well, what crime do you think he might have committed?
This has got to be the only time in recorded history that the witch hunter has failed to prove the witch.
That factoid really, really, really bothers Mueller..
Can’t prove a negative, he could have easily said, if we had evidence he had committed a crime of obstruction we would present it, we don’t.
Pray that they do just that.
That is a BS statement that ANY reputable prosecutor or investigator would never make. Yeah, I know...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.