Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2019 1:46:13 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SleeperCatcher

Can’t wait to hear what .04% Gillibrand has to say, was she branded by NXIVM’s Ranierre?


2 posted on 05/08/2019 1:48:16 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

But ‘diversity is their strength’!.............


3 posted on 05/08/2019 1:48:37 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

Oh my, that’s not very Boboli.


4 posted on 05/08/2019 1:51:44 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

Scared of what some of these fringers might say.


5 posted on 05/08/2019 1:52:53 PM PDT by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

Bulls**t candidates.

He’s right. All 350 morons currently running for president are bulls**t candidates.

But what choice do they have? Is there even one mainstream normal typical democrat left anywhere?


6 posted on 05/08/2019 1:53:20 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd ( Import the third world and you'll become the third world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

whattya mean “some” BS candidates. They all are, not just some.


7 posted on 05/08/2019 1:57:53 PM PDT by llevrok (Vote, while it is still legal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

It makes no difference who is in the debates. Debates and even primaries aren’t required for picking a candidate. The results of debates and primaries aren’t required to be considered by the party. A party can nominate anyone it wants to nominate, period.


8 posted on 05/08/2019 1:59:48 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

If they didn’t allow Bulls$%te candidates to talk, there wouldn’t be a debate.


9 posted on 05/08/2019 2:01:18 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

He wouldn’t even identify himself. Which one do you suppose? Dean?


10 posted on 05/08/2019 2:02:59 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

They’re not entirely wrong. Who the hell is “Andrew Yang”? Imagine a GOP presidential debate with some random dude up on stage who’s never been elected anything and has <10% national name recognition.


11 posted on 05/08/2019 2:03:05 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

With that many candidates it can’t be a debate. Try a mini-series.


12 posted on 05/08/2019 2:05:11 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

I can’t wait to see all 20 (or more) of these goobers on-stage vying for attentions.


13 posted on 05/08/2019 2:16:56 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

They are all bullsh!t candidates.


14 posted on 05/08/2019 2:30:14 PM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

Are bulls—t candidates anything like s—thole countries?


15 posted on 05/08/2019 2:41:45 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

I blame the Clinton’s for all the little know candidates.
Bush 1 was supposed to be unstoppable. Then he was beaten by a little know governor from Arkansas, who then ran the party for over 2 decades. They all want to be the next, giant killer.


17 posted on 05/08/2019 2:44:29 PM PDT by Kakaze (I want The Republic back !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

“Former DNC official blasts party leaders for allowing ‘bulls**t candidates’ in debates”

the guy has actually got a good point ... fortunately, the Dem leadership is determined to flush their already minuscule chances for 2020 completely down the proverbial toilet, so won’t be listening to any practical advice ...


19 posted on 05/08/2019 2:53:39 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

What is the problem. We have had many elections where multiple candidates were running. The field winnows out right after the first primaries.


21 posted on 05/08/2019 3:17:40 PM PDT by tellw (ed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

The democrats’ problem is that ALL of their candidates are BS candidates.


22 posted on 05/08/2019 5:25:58 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

Former DNC official blasts party leaders for allowing ‘bulls**t candidates’ in debates

That would be ALL of them.


25 posted on 05/08/2019 10:30:01 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SleeperCatcher

B*llsh*t candidates? Doesn’t that term include all 24 announced candidates?

Oh, no, the Democrats’ candidate will be Hitlery KKKlintoon again!


26 posted on 06/05/2019 6:07:11 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson