Posted on 02/15/2019 7:06:15 AM PST by COUNTrecount
Live | The White House 02/15/2019
President Trump Speaks on the National Security and Humanitarian Crisis on Our Southern Border
10:00 AM EST The White House
https://www.whitehouse.gov/live/
Thanks for posting the youtube link.
Thanks for the notes.
the guy from champion college is a regular on the John and Ken show on KFI He was on when trump was banning immigrants from 7 countries.
Thanks LS for the clarity over the emotions out there.
Not a Repub loser. Go pose your sinless Conservatism somewhere else. You would have hated Reagan and his liberalism.
I was here long before the date on my homepage under a different handle...New computer and new name ...
Just go play with your lib buddies...You’re dismissed....
Sure you did which is why you signed up in 2015 before the election.
“Grow the hell up and get a new line. Man,I hate lemmings.
I think for myself and am terribly disappointed in the man I enthusiastically voted for.
His actions belie his rhetoric.”
Hey bramps, remember my post 143......
“Every time you NeverTrumpers jump the gun and start spewing your nevertrumper pea green soup hissy fits all over the place like Regan Blair, you end up looking like fools. Why dont you chill out and see where it all falls out?”
You should have taken my advice.
Y’all look stupid once again. WOMP WOMP
Veto not upheld. Did you look at the vote? Vetoproof majorities.
This was the right move. There wasn’t going to be another shutdown. Trump could not win that one. GOP senators already were bailing on the last one.
Yes!!!!
The United States...shall protect each [state] against invasion
U.S. Const. art. IV, sec. 4.
It is the feds constitutional duty to STOP INVASION. Illegal immigration and immigration of our enemies are INVASION.
THE CONSTITUTION is the best argument for a national emergency, if that's what it takes, and going against things like unconstitutional court decisions and unconstitutional Congressional acts and failure to act.
WE THE PEOPLE MUST get back to the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land. The Rule of Law - FREEDOM - versus the Rule of Man - TYRANNY.
Again, here, the Constitution is solid ground for Trump to proceed - he is mandated by the Constitution to do so - even better than the Angel Moms as good as that argument may be.
And while we're on the subject of a constitutional federal government, I hope the government stays shut down and then gradually bring back ONLY the 20% constitutional portion. Leave the $3 trillion + 80% unconstitutional portion shut down.
Reinstating the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land against the feds is the KEY to the recovery of our Free Constitutional Republic.
If you trusted our president would you think Jared and Ivanka could knock him off course?
You should start by realizing that Trump’s political intelligence is greater than anyone else in politics going back to the stone age.
You know, its okay if people dont see eye-to-eye with what you believe.
Because we elected a man who doesnt seem to know how to take a stand.
I just dont understand how how anyone could think that. The President Trump I see is making stands 24/7. And usually hes alone doing it alone -with an unprecedented lack of support from his own party, and fierce opposition from the Democrats, and a completely sold-out press.
I think you are looking at this the wrong way. Every war - even the great victories throughout history - involved losing battles and severe setbacks. Every battle that was eventually won had moments in which concessions had to be made, positions had to be consolidated, losses had to be cut.
But you are questioning the backbone of a man who looks to me like hes all backbone.
That’s very true, I should let you know I agree with what you say. More specifically, I agree that people have a right to their beliefs.
My goal has nothing to do with getting people to agree with me. What I prefer to do is simply state my opinion about what’s true or what’s not true, and I don’t tend to hold back if I’m passionate about what I believe.
Takeaway point for you: asserting one’s opinion is not the same as denying the autonomy of others.
Which brings us to a focus on your position.
Are you trying to imply, perhaps in a passive-aggressive way, that you disagree with my statement? My statement that Trumps political intelligence is greater than anyone else in politics?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.