Posted on 01/27/2019 9:48:58 AM PST by Kaslin
Lifesite News reports that Dr. William Lile, a board certified obstetrician-gynecologist, has issued a blistering condemnation of New York state's recently passed state law which allows abortion up until birth.
As noted by Lifesite's Calvin Freiburger, Dr. Wile says that "modern medical technology is already giving preborn babies blood transfusions, heart surgery, and more." Many of these surgeries can occur at 22 weeks in the womb, the Alabama and Florida licensed practitioner said. Thus, “If they're a patient they're a person, and if they are a person they deserve our protection."
But, New York's bill states that “Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child, or to have an abortion.” The new law also "erases the state’s recognition of preborn babies older than 24 weeks as potential homicide victims, removes abortion from the penal code entirely, and allows licensed health practitioners other than full doctors to commit abortions."
None of that seems to matter New York Democrats who celebrated the passage of the bill by clapping and smiling in the state house upon its passage. Dr. Wile responded to these cheers by saying, “Celebrating what? The governor just signed a law saying that we can take the lives of the babies in the womb up until their due date. That's nothing to celebrate...To take the lives of these babies in the womb breaks my heart. It is not good for us and is not good for America."
Dr. Wile has delivered nearly 4,000 babies in his private practice and his full statement regarding the New York Bill can be seen here:
Isn’t it odd that the mothers of today say ...”WE’RE having a BABY”....including the father as if he’s as pregnant as they are...but only if the baby is wanted is he included or is the baby seen as a living baby.
If not wanted then the father has no say because it’s suddenly her baby is now just fetus tissue no matter how the body shows arms, legs and a heart beat etc....and the father is just a bystander.
If I were a young man today I would be extremely hesitant to marry let alone engage with women out to trap who they will.....is it any wonder they’re resorting to sex with other males?
He loves a good debate you know! I have found this to be true often as well. He is also our friend which tempers the debate.
There was a time I sat on a huge bolder ‘telling’ God that everything in life looked like he wasn’t in control and had left the planet...or wasn’t even there at all. So how was I suppose to believe what I otherwise knew.
His question in response was an eyeopener...”Then who are you talking with?”
It’s inaccurate to say that it was a war to end slavery. The Republican Party lost its majority in 1862 because of Lincoln’s emancipation proclamation. The big draft riot in NYC immortalized in Gangs of New York left many black New Yorkers lynched, including the madame of a brothel. But the result of the war was that slaves were emancipated, and the causes of the war had a lot to do with slavery.
My brain spent many valuable seconds trying to make “Doctor Who” the subject in that headline.
From what I understand it’s right up to the ninth month.
Did same Pope have a comment about New York’s complete purging of restrictions on abortions?
Wow, Dr Who has become even more liberal than I thought. I’m never watching that show again! ;)
This has been weighing so heavily on me all week. I have a friend who recently told me she is in favor of abortion. I guess I wasn’t as surprised because she’s one of those uninformed, has other things to care about people, but her argument upset me very much and is so hackneyed an excuse.
What do you say to those who tell you they support abortion because why should a baby be born that nobody wants. And who is going to care for those babies? She really was using the argument that we pro-lifers want the babies to be born but then don’t care how or who cares for them.
Shocked at that kind of answer.
This is as terrible as a King horror novel, no?
It is actually worse because it is real.
What's a PERSON??
Aye; there's the rub!
=================================
New York Gov Cuomo gleefully signs bill makes full term abortion legal....being born is ok to kill.
Cuomo and his fellow Mengele fans laugh it up as he signed the death bill. The fat grinning granny is
Sarah Weddington who argued the infamous 1973 abortion case before the USSC.
"Hope you people got your orders in for those custom Lamborghinis. We’re talking real money with this bill."
One day in the future, God will put those smiles and smirks on the other side of their faces. Though this will cost many babies their lives, they will go to Heaven it will also make the fires of Hell much hotter for those smiling and smirking faces.
WHAT'S NEXT FOR NY? Cuomo will demand medical reports and checkoffs for newborns w/ diseases; toddlers who have bow legs, 3-4 year olds who won't put away their toys, the ones who won't toilet-train. Next Cuomo will troll kindergartens for kids who don't color within the lines---all of them marked for post-birth abortions.
=================================
We know what's coming next.
Nobelists Crick left, Watson right---discoverers of the double helix.
It was Crick who postulated that newborns not be issued birth certificates until they've passed a "quality evaluation test."
Is there any kind of organized boycott of NY? Will prolife people please not go there or do business with anyone headquartered there, is this possible?
“It’s for the children”
Each individual sovereign state is free to define person within reason imo. That’s why the Roe v. Wade (RvW) Supreme Court was wrong to throw out constitutionally unchecked, 10th Amendment (10A)-protected Texas law that prohibited abortion imo.
After all, the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the politically correct “right” to have an abortion like they did with the rights expressly protected by the Bill of Rights.
In other words, the fictitious "right" to have an abortion was scandalously legislated from the bench by post-FDR era, institutionally indoctrinated activist justices imo.
In fact, using inappropriate words like "concept" and "implicit," this is what was left of 10A after FDR's state sovereignty-ignoring justices got finished with it in Wickard v. Filburn.
"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"In discussion and decision, the point of reference, instead of being what was "necessary and proper" to the exercise by Congress of its granted power, was often some concept [???] of sovereignty thought to be implicit [??? emphases added] in the status of statehood." —Wickard v. Filburn, 1942.
With all due respect to family, friends and supporters of the late Terri Schiavo, the post-17th Amendment ratification Supremes should have decided not to hear RvW imo like they decided not to hear Terri’s case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
