Posted on 01/27/2019 5:27:30 AM PST by Libloather
In a scathing condemnation of Roger Stone following his Friday indictment, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-F.L.) accused the longtime ally of President Donald Trump of illegally securing his election.
In an interview with CNN on Saturday, the congresswoman, who resigned from her post as the head of the Democratic National Committee after the hacking and subsequent WikiLeaks dump of the organizations emails, said Trumps campaign had been infected with contact with Russia.
In this case with Roger Stone, he literally weaponized information stolen by Vladimir Putin to help elect Donald Trump president, she asserted. He worked with high-level campaign officials from the Trump campaign who were directed by someone even higher essentially to make sure that they could traffick in information stole by a foreign enemy state to elect the candidate that he supported president of the United States, and it was a disgusting and traitorous act, and it needs to be prosecuted.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.huffpost.com ...
Wikileaks doesn’t need Roger Stone to release information. Anyone could have hacked the dnc they had no security (let alone the fact that the metadata on the emails show that they were most likely downloaded on site and not transferred over the internet). One wonders why Mueller hasn’t taken the dnc servers as evidence. Mueller is a pathetic buffoon and should be in Jail himself.
This from the woman who employed the Muslim Brotherhood to handle Democrat Congressmen’s correspondence ..incredible! She ought to be in prison.
Obama weaponized the entire federal government to achieve political goals, and the corruption appears to be irreversible.
Debbie Does Florida needs to keep a lower profile. Their are lots of charges she can be brought up on.
Well yes and no.
If the “stolen evidence” was factual and true, then (a) did not Americans have a right to know it and (b) wasn’t it a good thing that “stolen evidence” was made public.
It seems that what the former DNC chair thinks is “criminal” is seeing the Dims dirty laundry washed before the public without their permission.
Lie detector test for Wasserman, under oath.
Question: Was Seth Rich involved in stealing your emails?
Why did you try to cover for your Pakistani tech?
“Wittle” Debbie (Loonie Leftie Lady)
Is trying to redirect examination of her real involvement in “fixing” the ComDem Primary and the international spy ring involved in monitoring the Congressman’s email by Paks and others.
More ComDem Insanity. And from HuffPo. Headshake.
Well, she has to find a scapegoat to deflect attention from the incompetence of the Democrat leadership in failing to get their anointed one elected as President.
By all rights, that leadership should have been removed from top to bottom - Trumps victory was a complete disgrace for the Democrat leaders. So they have to find a way to explain and justify themselves to their donors and their rank and file.
Still trying to figure out what crime was committed, even if the campaign tried to follow up on dirt about candles no matter where it came from.
I am sure that George Soros, Hillary, Obama, Wassermanshults, Fusion GPS DNC, FBI, and DOJ would NEVER illegals obtain information and weoponize it, and even disseminate it illegally to sway an election. Roger Stone just tried to get stolen information, he didnt send his goons into the NSA database, wiretap Americans, weoponize government, and break law after law pursueing it!!! Roger Stone is a process criminal, pursued by real criminals.
What information did Trump use to defeat Hillary? Please tell us.
DWS needs to be brought in for questioning as her statement is completely unsupported and unsubstantiated even to an unbiased observer who tracks the evidence from case filings, press reports, and social media of official players.
She and her press agents also need to be sued by private citizen Roger Stone for defamation, libel, and slander.
#SethRich
Wow---I am so impressed with D/W/S's detailed, inside knowledge of the Trump campaign.
Schultz's IT aide Imran Awan really earned the princely salary she paid him with our tax dollars.
Nancy Pelosi helped out, throwing in an additional $10 million tax dollars to enhance all that "cybersecurity" managed by the DNC's IT.
D/W/S was then in power heading the DNC; pal of Obama; riding Air Force One. Taxpayers demand to know the extent of DNC assistance to (A) members of the House intel panel, and, (B) members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs; among dozens of elected members for whom the Awan clan IT'ed.
CONGRESS, PRESIDENT TRUMP, DOJ,AND THE FBI NEED TO DETERMINE:
<><> Did the DNC vet the Awans' security clearance to handle this type of intel?
<><>Who, by name, had access to DNC computers?
<><> Where is D/W/S's administrative authorization to do so?
<><>When was that authorization given?
<><> Who received govt intel?
<><> Did he DNC officially qualify the Awans to handle national-security-level data?
<><> Did the Awan clan ever upgrade, manage, and secure the DNC server.
<><> What - specifically - did they do at the DNC?
<><>Did the Awan's ever remove all data from the intel computers?
<><> Who else received govt intel from the DNC?
<><>Did the Awan's have official DNC approval to handle national-security-level data?
<><>Were House intel computers ever transported off-premises?
<><>Did the FBI and/or Secret Service accompany and supervise the House IT's?
<><> Did the Awan clan have active email accounts?
<><> Was there continuity of intel computer activity or did the intel computers ever go off-line?
<><> Did the Awan clan ever upgrade, manage, and secure the DNC server.
<><> What - specifically - did they do at the DNC?
<><> What were the DNC firewall protocols in place at the time?
<><> Was malware or antivirus also on the server?
<><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system upgraded, managed, and secured by the Awans?
<><> Did the DNC report any incidents such as DOS attack, hacking, etc.
<><> How were these incidences resolved?
<><> Did the Awans maintain the DNC intel computer?
<><> Does the DNC know if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee computers in functioning condition at that time?
<><> Does the DNC have the work schedule of the Awans just prior to being outed for security breaches?
<><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server?
<><> Where are the back-ups kept?
<><> If no backups were taken, does the DNC have a disaster recovery location? Where is that?
<><> Did the DNC have a backup plan if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee plan intel equipment failed or was found to have been compromised?
<><> Does the DNC list other foreign nationals (countries then-Pres Obama id'd as terrorist) employed on Capitol Hill?
<><> Did the DNC list foreign nationals by name and country w/ access to US intel on govt computers.
=====================================
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FBI TIP PAGE---https://tips.fbi.gov
CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
FBI tip line web site----https://www.fbi.gov/tips
FBI electronic fraud unit----www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-fraud-schemes/internet-fraud
FBI Major Case Contact Center: 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324)
Exposing YOUR crimes is LEGITIMATE!!!
You only care THAT you were exposed.
weaponizing does not mean cannot find out anything, weaponizing was done by Hillary, the IRS, Obummer etc..
we must start shouting them down, if its war then so be it, liberty or death!
Gee, its almost like Debbie is in the FBI or something....
HuffPo and many other media outfits have forgotten to add the word "alleged" to their assertions. They also seem to assume "hacking" and "pfishing" are the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.