Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-DNC Chair (Wasserman Schultz): Roger Stone ‘Weaponized’ Intel ‘Stolen’ By Putin
Huffpost ^ | 1/27/19 | Amy Russo

Posted on 01/27/2019 5:27:30 AM PST by Libloather

In a scathing condemnation of Roger Stone following his Friday indictment, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-F.L.) accused the longtime ally of President Donald Trump of illegally securing his election.

In an interview with CNN on Saturday, the congresswoman, who resigned from her post as the head of the Democratic National Committee after the hacking and subsequent WikiLeaks dump of the organization’s emails, said Trump’s campaign had been “infected with contact with Russia.”

“In this case with Roger Stone, he literally weaponized information stolen by Vladimir Putin to help elect Donald Trump president,” she asserted. “He worked with high-level campaign officials from the Trump campaign who were directed by someone even higher essentially to make sure that they could traffick in information stole by a foreign enemy state to elect the candidate that he supported president of the United States, and it was a disgusting and traitorous act, and it needs to be prosecuted.”

(Excerpt) Read more at m.huffpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: putin; schultz; stone; wasserman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: All

Wikileaks doesn’t need Roger Stone to release information. Anyone could have hacked the dnc they had no security (let alone the fact that the metadata on the emails show that they were most likely downloaded on site and not transferred over the internet). One wonders why Mueller hasn’t taken the dnc servers as evidence. Mueller is a pathetic buffoon and should be in Jail himself.


21 posted on 01/27/2019 6:02:04 AM PST by escapefromboston (Free Assange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This from the woman who employed the Muslim Brotherhood to handle Democrat Congressmen’s correspondence…..incredible! She ought to be in prison.


22 posted on 01/27/2019 6:02:30 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Obama weaponized the entire federal government to achieve political goals, and the corruption appears to be irreversible.


23 posted on 01/27/2019 6:03:16 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Why is the crazy, bug-eyed, bottle blonde not in prison, washing clothes?


24 posted on 01/27/2019 6:05:59 AM PST by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Debbie Does Florida needs to keep a lower profile. Their are lots of charges she can be brought up on.


25 posted on 01/27/2019 6:07:34 AM PST by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well yes and no.

If the “stolen evidence” was factual and true, then (a) did not Americans have a right to know it and (b) wasn’t it a good thing that “stolen evidence” was made public.

It seems that what the former DNC chair thinks is “criminal” is seeing the Dims dirty laundry washed before the public without their permission.


26 posted on 01/27/2019 6:12:10 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Lie detector test for Wasserman, under oath.

Question: Was Seth Rich involved in stealing your emails?

Why did you try to cover for your Pakistani tech?


27 posted on 01/27/2019 6:17:59 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Wittle” Debbie (Loonie Leftie Lady)

Is trying to redirect examination of her real involvement in “fixing” the ComDem Primary and the international spy ring involved in monitoring the Congressman’s email by Paks and others.

More ComDem Insanity. And from HuffPo. Headshake.


28 posted on 01/27/2019 6:18:52 AM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well, she has to find a scapegoat to deflect attention from the incompetence of the Democrat leadership in failing to get their anointed one elected as President.

By all rights, that leadership should have been removed from top to bottom - Trump’s victory was a complete disgrace for the Democrat leaders. So they have to find a way to “explain” and justify themselves to their donors and their rank and file.


29 posted on 01/27/2019 6:22:32 AM PST by Hartmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Still trying to figure out what crime was committed, even if the campaign tried to follow up on dirt about candles no matter where it came from.


30 posted on 01/27/2019 6:22:54 AM PST by Sirius Lee (In God We Trust, In Trump We MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I am sure that George Soros, Hillary, Obama, Wassermanshults, Fusion GPS DNC, FBI, and DOJ would NEVER illegals obtain information and weoponize it, and even disseminate it illegally to sway an election. Roger Stone just tried to get stolen information, he didn’t send his goons into the NSA database, wiretap Americans, weoponize government, and break law after law pursueing it!!! Roger Stone is a process criminal, pursued by real criminals.


31 posted on 01/27/2019 6:25:24 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
“In this case with Roger Stone, he literally weaponized information stolen by Vladimir Putin to help elect Donald Trump president,”

What information did Trump use to defeat Hillary? Please tell us.

32 posted on 01/27/2019 6:28:58 AM PST by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

DWS needs to be brought in for questioning as her statement is completely unsupported and unsubstantiated even to an unbiased observer who tracks the evidence from case filings, press reports, and social media of official players.

She and her press agents also need to be sued by private citizen Roger Stone for defamation, libel, and slander.


33 posted on 01/27/2019 6:29:27 AM PST by Hostage (Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

#SethRich


34 posted on 01/27/2019 6:38:09 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Jane Long; MinuteGal; jsanders2001; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; stephenjohnbanker; ...
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ TELLS ALL: “Roger Stone literally weaponized information stolen by Vladimir Putin to help elect Donald Trump,” she asserted on CNN. “Stone worked with high-level Trump campaign officials who were directed by someone even higher essentially to make sure that they could traffick in information stolen by a foreign enemy state to elect the candidate that he supported president of the United States, and it was a disgusting and traitorous act, and it needs to be prosecuted.”

Wow---I am so impressed with D/W/S's detailed, inside knowledge of the Trump campaign.
Schultz's IT aide Imran Awan really earned the princely salary she paid him with our tax dollars.
Nancy Pelosi helped out, throwing in an additional $10 million tax dollars to enhance all that "cybersecurity" managed by the DNC's IT.

D/W/S was then in power heading the DNC; pal of Obama; riding Air Force One. Taxpayers demand to know the extent of DNC assistance to (A) members of the House intel panel, and, (B) members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs; among dozens of elected members for whom the Awan clan IT'ed.

CONGRESS, PRESIDENT TRUMP, DOJ,AND THE FBI NEED TO DETERMINE:

<><> Did the DNC vet the Awans' security clearance to handle this type of intel?

<><>Who, by name, had access to DNC computers?

<><> Where is D/W/S's administrative authorization to do so?

<><>When was that authorization given?

<><> Who received govt intel?

<><> Did he DNC officially qualify the Awans to handle national-security-level data?

<><> Did the Awan clan ever upgrade, manage, and secure the DNC server.

<><> What - specifically - did they do at the DNC?

<><>Did the Awan's ever remove all data from the intel computers?

<><> Who else received govt intel from the DNC?

<><>Did the Awan's have official DNC approval to handle national-security-level data?

<><>Were House intel computers ever transported off-premises?

<><>Did the FBI and/or Secret Service accompany and supervise the House IT's?

<><> Did the Awan clan have active email accounts?

<><> Was there continuity of intel computer activity or did the intel computers ever go off-line?

<><> Did the Awan clan ever upgrade, manage, and secure the DNC server.

<><> What - specifically - did they do at the DNC?

<><> What were the DNC firewall protocols in place at the time?

<><> Was malware or antivirus also on the server?

<><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured” by the Awans?

<><> Did the DNC report any incidents such as DOS attack, hacking, etc.

<><> How were these incidences resolved?

<><> Did the Awans maintain the DNC intel computer?

<><> Does the DNC know if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee computers in functioning condition at that time?

<><> Does the DNC have the work schedule of the Awans just prior to being outed for security breaches?

<><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server?

<><> Where are the back-ups kept?

<><> If no backups were taken, does the DNC have a disaster recovery location? Where is that?

<><> Did the DNC have a backup plan if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee plan intel equipment failed or was found to have been compromised?

<><> Does the DNC list other foreign nationals (countries then-Pres Obama id'd as terrorist) employed on Capitol Hill?

<><> Did the DNC list foreign nationals by name and country w/ access to US intel on govt computers.

=====================================

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

FBI TIP PAGE---https://tips.fbi.gov

CONTACT CONGRESS: Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044


FBI tip line web site----https://www.fbi.gov/tips
FBI electronic fraud unit----www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-fraud-schemes/internet-fraud
FBI Major Case Contact Center: 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324)

35 posted on 01/27/2019 6:40:11 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hey Schultz!

Exposing YOUR crimes is LEGITIMATE!!!

You only care THAT you were exposed.

36 posted on 01/27/2019 6:40:35 AM PST by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

weaponizing does not mean cannot find out anything, weaponizing was done by Hillary, the IRS, Obummer etc..
we must start shouting them down, if its war then so be it, liberty or death!


37 posted on 01/27/2019 6:47:40 AM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Gee, it’s almost like Debbie is in the FBI or something....


38 posted on 01/27/2019 6:52:04 AM PST by TADSLOS (Who will be our John Brown?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MNnice
We need someone to explain how stolen emails influenced the election when no one will show us what’s actually in the emails.

LOL


39 posted on 01/27/2019 6:56:10 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liz; GOPJ
after the hacking and subsequent WikiLeaks dump....stolen by Vladimir Putin to help elect Donald Trump

HuffPo and many other media outfits have forgotten to add the word "alleged" to their assertions. They also seem to assume "hacking" and "pfishing" are the same.

40 posted on 01/27/2019 6:58:49 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson