Posted on 01/16/2019 9:57:57 PM PST by bitt
Research psychologist Robert Epstein joined Tucker Carlson on Thursday night.
In a previous appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight Epstein revealed that Google can take a 50-50 split among undecided voters and change it into a 90-10 split with no one knowing they had been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail… It has to do with their search suggestions.
On Thursday Dr. Epstein revealed that just one Google shift in search results on Election Day 2018 shifted from 800,000 to 4.6 million votes to Democratic candidates.
This follows the shocking Breitbart exposé by Allum Bokhari published Thursday that proves Google has been manipulating search results.
Of course the Big Tech companies have only been targeting only conservative websites and publications since the 2016 election.
Via Tucker Carlson Tonight:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
:)
Now that’s collusion!
CNN, MSDNC, ABC, NBC and See-BS all represent in kind contributions; not to mention NPR and Public Broadcasting that we help pay for.
Reminds me of an ad...Huge Sale, 10 to 50 percent off
Nauseating............
WHAT IS THE “ELECTRONIC FRAUD”?
Really?
You don’t know using a computer for the reasons stated is elec/fraud?
More people voted for Hillary than Trump and you doubt that they could be manipulated? Wake up, Maddow on msnbc now is beating every show on FOX.
Tip of the DemonRAT organized voter fraud!
“You don’t know using a computer for the reasons stated is elec/fraud?”
Election Fraud or Electronic Fraud?
In either case is it not necessary to prove Google intended to defraud with their actions?
Could Google not just claim editorial bias?
YES. This will be the equivalent of charging Al Capone with income tax evasion... AND it's our best bet at reeling in second level corruption.
I’m with you. People see an issue, “Google” it, get 10,000-plus results on that topic, scan a few on the first or second page of results (rarely deeper), but read only one or two articles. It’s entirely logical to conclude that the essence and general tone of the first several returns is what will stick and influence the person doing the “research”.
If one doesn’t know how to search and uses only very broad, general terms - like most users, that’s precisely what happens. Furthermore, users can buy enhanced visibility of their information, which further skews the results. It’s the value and the danger of the semantic web.
in addition to all out blatant vote cheating
and the democrats want NO opposition, they want absolute rule
no balance is not a good thing. (even too far right)
Election fraud is rampant and it has nothing to do with Russia, it has EVERYTHING to do with progressive democrats
xxx
DemocRats are criminals pure and simple.
Yeah, I’m too busy being manipulated by billboards and Facebook ads and changing my toxic masculinity due to a razor commercial.
Must suck being so gullible like you.
They can (and have published academic papers on it) determine what type of people are manipulable how.
They’ve performed a number of experiments on how to identify users who are subject to social manipulation via their platform, and to tailor presentation to conduct that manipulation. They have identified that they can even adjust how happy or sad many users are by slanting the search responses and news presentations in certain ways.
They’ve fomented at least two civil wars.
Yes, it can be measured - albeit in the aggregate.
Agree
Bookmark
Must be tough to be so ignorant and dense that you can’t even begin to understand these issues.
It is NOT about whether one person (you) or another is too smart and sophisticated to be “influenced” by political advertising.... it is about whether thousands/millions of other VOTERS (legal or not) are to be channeled to/from what they see by forces which favor only one party or political program, and which the user may not even be aware of.
It has absolutely NOTHING to do with whether you (or every FReeper, conservative, etc.) chooses to avoid Fakebook, social media, Google and Youtube, etc.
It has to do with shaping millions of the LEAST aware and knowledgeable and thoughtful minds, who are STILL ELIGIBLE TO VOTE AS YOU ARE.
Do you truly not know how many close electoral counts there are?
btw, your ranting response was full of “straw man” positions. I did not say govt was the answer or that laws and regulations would/could take care of the problems.
The first step, which you cannot be bothered to take, is serious research and analysis to actually KNOW what is happening and what might well happen in the future.
Then, it is certainly not enough to say “well I, smart guy, will just stay away from Google, Fakebook, etc.”
The large question is what is happening in the electorate across the country, not what you or I decide to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.