10 Reasons The FBI Will Clear Kavanaugh

Townhall.com ^ | September 30, 2018 | Kevin McCullough

[Kaslin]

The FBI will conclude its “supplemental” background check into Judge Kavanaugh (it’s 7th), limiting its time and scope to focus on purely the claims of sexual misconduct earlier than the Democrats hoped.

Those Democrats will resort to additional dirty tactics. Speeches from all of the Democrats will occur on the floor of the Senate—most opposing Kavanaugh. They will throw seismic fits, and spittle-flying rants, condemning Kavanaugh, republicans and even the very FBI they begged to investigate all in an attempt to destroy and demoralize Judge Kavanaugh.

Newly dubbed Majority Leader “Cocaine Mitch” McConnell will whip the vote and Judge Kavanaugh will fill the spot of the ninth justice on the Supreme Court

It will conclude one of the ugliest periods of American politics. Sadly about fifty percent of the American people will be too uninformed to explain why it was so ugly. The average American will mistakenly think (thanks to the horrifically awful media) that Judge Kavanaugh did something that no one ever proved he did.
Not one scintilla of evidence revealed, and all witnesses involved clearing him of any involvement, attendance, or even having met.

Justice Kavanaugh’s life will never be the same. Nor will his accuser’s. But sadly some of the Senate Democrats who decided to ruin these lives will sleep like babies and never take so much as a moment to ponder the damage they did. They will never question the unethical use of violating the trust of a constituent who confided in them and desired an anonymous process. They will never regret their attempt to slander an honorable father in the eyes of his own daughters. They will only move to plot their next step in attempting to regain power.
Having realized that here are some basic reasons the FBI investigation will conclude the matter.

1. In a supplemental background check the witnesses involved will be interviewed. All have agreed to cooperate fully. They will answer the questions asked, and in all likelihood give the same answers they’ve already given under oath and under penalty of felony perjury if their answers differ from what they previously said.
2. The FBI (will for the second time) along with Maryland authorities, as well as every prosecutor that has looked at this evidence admit there is no felony/federal jurisdiction here. 
3. After the Democratic Party attempted to have Kavanaugh arrested on Saturday, Maryland officials reiterated their findings that by their standards, the worst charges possible, would carry with them a one year statute of limitations. 
4. Additional prosecutors are on the record citing the evidence as insufficient to even merit a basis for a search warrant—much less an arrest.
5. What all of the law enforcement bodies continue to point to is lack of a time and place. And while the accuser is 100% sure that something happened. The accused and 3 witnesses are 100% sure they were not witness to any event resembling its description.
6. The FBI will also highlight greater amounts of exculpatory evidence against Dr. Ford. Her “fear” of flying, her “misremembering” her 100% clear account at the mysterious Safeway “second door” (it only had one,) her complete inability to figure out how she got to or from the “incident,” and the continued refutation by her best friend that such a gathering occurred with her present is likely the tip of the iceberg.
7. Therapy notes will likely be required to be turned over. Why they were not turned over to the Senate Judiciary is inexplicable especially since she uses that as “corroboration” of her first “telling” of the mysterious incident.
8. Dr. Ford’s own family—not a one—was capable of coming to her support for this dreadful season. Why weren’t they? The FBI may need to ask given that she was living with her parents at the time.
9. The FBI may also need to probe possible motives for Dr. Ford. Her work on RU-486 (the abortion pill) would certainly be in jeopardy if he is named to the court. Her five go-fund-me accounts with alleged links to Soros and a now blossoming $1 million dollar surplus were established why? To pay her pro-bono lawyers? (Remember it was her lawyers that testified they were pro-bono — if it turns out a Democratic staffer is paying them then they committed perjury.) Are the go-fund-me crowdsourcing efforts really a way to pay off a witness for coming before a Senate committee (in itself a felony crime?)
10. The FBI may very well uncover a coordinated effort between the Senate staffer who leaked Dr Ford’s name (against her wishes,) the law firm recommended by the ranking member, and the links to others making accusations.

By Saturday midday, Judiciary Democrats, with the investigation having not even been underway for a full twenty-four hours were already attempting to undermine the validity and reliability of its efforts.

Simultaneously Mitch McConnell tweeted a short clip of his floor speech from late Friday. In it he made crystal clear that “all fifty-one” republicans were in agreement in moving forward with the scheduled vote. “All fifty-one,” he reiterated.

I think he may know more than he’s let on. I believe the FBI may actually be nearing completion of its “supplemental background investigation.”

And thankfully I believe that this nightmare for Judge Kavanaugh is almost finished.
For the sake and innocence of his daughters, bride, family and all who have supported and been grateful for his public service of over 30 years—It’s past time!

[Ben Barrack]

What? I support Trump.

Why do you deny facts?

[Ben Barrack]

1.) do you have a problem with the conclusion of the Vince Foster investigation?

2.) do you deny Kavanaugh was a lead investigator?

can’t wait to see your responses.

[MHGinTN]

Even more likely than something actually happened to traumatize her but by someone else. This female is a deeply troubled liar. I can count five lies she told in the Hearing. Imagine what she has invested in this great lie ... and hiw much the demonrats will pay her to keep the fraud going. Dead souls, the lot of them.

[Engedi]

Ford said that Judge worked at Safeway and he was there about 6 weeks after the attack and she and her mom walked in the store and she said HI to Judge. She said when he worked there and she saw him was about 6 weeks after the attack. Research has shown there was no safeway there. Besides, he walks up to a man who tried to rape you and says HI.

[Engedi]

2012 has to do with Romney and he had Kav and I thin Gorsuch on his short list back then. Since he didn’t win, fast forward to Trunmp and Kav nomination and now the allegation comes out.

[Eagles6]

Yes, I agree that someone wouldn’t do that. Especially if the store didn’t exist!

[Verginius Rufus]

Ford and Kavanaugh did not attend the same high school—he went to an all-boys Catholic high school and she attended an all-girls (non-Catholic) high school. Kavanaugh said they weren’t in the same social circle but wasn’t sure if they had met. I don’t know if any evidence has been put forward (other than Ford’s allegations—hardly “evidence”) that they knew each other at all in high school. Her friend who was supposedly at the party had never met Kavanaugh.

[Pining_4_TX]

No, they are bringing up a new charge - that Kavanaugh lied about his drinking. They now have people who have come forward claiming he was often drunk and belligerent. It’s not going to end.

[MHGinTN]

Liberals, leftists, and particularly demonrats have dead souls. They lie with ease because they are of their father ...

[nd76]

Safeway is now owned by an entity called “New Albertsons”. This entity also owns ACME, based in the Philadelphia area, which used to have a store on Kent Island, MD.

[trebb]

If I could spend 15 minutes with her, and revisit some of her ‘testimony”, I could prove her to be a liar who is being used by the Dems......ironic thing is she’s supposed to be smart and she thinks she’s doing it willingly....

[Elsie]

10: The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

20: Go to 10

 

 

FORTRAN programmer?

 

More likely a flow chart outline.

 

The following is a FORTRAN statement

print *, 'The velocity on impact is', v1

 

The colon would make 10&20 labels in some languages; but I do not know what function label 10 is trying to do.

 

To make an actual small program in FORTRAN would take a bit of debugging...

 

 

 

10: print *, 'The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.'

  Go to 10

 

 Giving an output of...

 

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

The bi-atch is lying through her liberal lips and has nothing to back her up.

 

[Elsie]

Cousin It???

[Elsie]

Alberson’s was just a higher end Safeway.

There goes the neighborhood!

[imardmd1]

Then there's less to it than I even thought. She's selling vaporware. And people actually believe it!

[PapaBear3625]

Remember it was her lawyers that testified they were pro-bono — if it turns out a Democratic staffer is paying them then they committed perjury.

It might be hard to prove if they get a lot of their billing from representing "non profit" organizations. All the staffer would have to do is arrange for some additional grants/contributions to their main employer.

[Emmett McCarthy]

When did that happen? I went to high school downtown on Eye St. but finished there in ‘67 and was not around DC all that much after that. I had lived in Silver Spring, though.

[Covenantor]

Had to be about that time 67-69...I left DC in late 69. Mom worked two blocks north of the WH and was always bringing Chanterelles home. Being a HS guy my interest in food was the eating of it, so never paid much attention the few times I went.

Big assortments of foreign foods... game meat and fowl, condiments, canned goods.

Trying recall HS on Eye? Catholic? Western for me.

[spacewarp]

That was BASIC.

Old school