Posted on 09/17/2018 4:55:18 AM PDT by Oklahoma
Maryland Judiciary Case Search shows the case. On 08/08/96 UMLIC-EIGHT CORP, the lender, filed a request for foreclosure of the Blaseys' property at 17 Masters Court, Potomac.
On 08/13/96 Judge Michael D. Mason granted that request. According to the Montgomery County Land Records, on December 17, 1996, the Blaseys refinanced the property with Chevy Chase Bank. On 01/27/97 Judge Martha Kavanaugh signed UMLIC's motion to dismiss the foreclosure.
So the Blaseys refinanced the property, paid the foreclosing lender, and a foreclosure never occurred. Judge Kavanaugh's only involvement was to sign the dismissal of the foreclosure action, which would hardly create any animosity towards her or Brett by the Blaseys. It is also important to understand that foreclosures in Maryland are largely administrative. They are not adversarial proceedings in which a judge ultimately picks a side.
I am not trying to defend this c**t, but people are approaching the connection in the foreclosure case as if it's some important find. It is not. It means nothing. There are many far better ways to attack her than this.
68 posted on 9/17/2018 6:35:26 AM by KevinB
My daughter went to Madeira. It was expensive and so is Holton Arms.
Her name was listed when I looked at it over the weekend.
Disagree completely. There is more to this than their is to the accusation of sexual assault. Period.
Why, after all this time? This is why. Case closed. Take the vote.
Sorry but this is ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT HER MOTIVATION. This “professor” is a doctrinaire Social Justice Warrior and THAT is all the motivation she needs to lie.
Reading the remarks on this thread - quite a tale being created from a few fragments of information.
Gotta know more.
How many houses did they own?
Was this their primary residence?
Why was it in foreclosure?
Im wondering if there isn’t some legit reason to allow a property to go to foreclousre - not as retribution - but just a process - so you can get to a point to renegotiate.
Wondering if any real estate people can clarify?
Interesting Comments on Chrissie Ford from Heavy.com
FWIW—
Lukas Statler September 17th, 2018
I was in the same class as “Chrissie” Blasey (1984). She went to Holton Arms–the sister school to my school, Landon School for Boys. She was well known for her sexual escapades, some of them quite disturbing.... Like the famous “bj” car where in the back of a darkened station wagon she .... on multiple young men. Or the time she took on most of the football team. Her nickname was Chrissie Blowsey–
I’ll leave it at that. She was also a very manipulative and vindictive person. So we all need to take her allegations with more than a grain of salt. she was a knock-down, drag-out slut all through High School. I know–I was there, graduated in the same Class of 1984. So how can we trust her?
Again, FWIW.
Has Christine Ford made false accusations before? Wonder what the attack on the local judge was all about? Anyone familiar with Palo Alto politics - Santa Clara County & its judges?
See post 41.
Also, their house night have had a sign out front for 3-4 months saying it was for sale, and it’s possible there was an add on banner saying Foreclosure. I’m just speculating. But if it did, that would have been an embarrassment to her.
I agree with the scorched earth approach. The rats are nasty,hateful people. They are a cancer to this country.
Can you provide a link to this comment? I feel like this would be explosive.
hmmm...... a forclosed and scorned girl is very bad news
I’d like to know what DiFi’s communist spy who was her office manager and driver for 20 years has to say about all this. Maybe the Pakistani spies who were hired by 20 DIM congress losers for years know.
It means that the DIMS are without conscience . Nothing new.
Laura Ingraham just mentioned the revenge angle based on this foreclosure angle.
bookmark
I do not know if the following is true.
It is taken from a comment at Legal Insurrection.
Wisewerds | September 17, 2018 at 9:34 am
“The case docket apparently does not bear this out. It shows a different judge entering an adverse order, and then Kavanaugh’s mother entering a stipulated order of dismissal after Blasey’s parents apparently paid the amounts past due.”
Interesting that this guy who comments is willing to use his name to refute this charge. I hope he shows up for the hearing in DC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.