1 posted on
08/12/2018 3:40:46 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
2 posted on
08/12/2018 3:41:02 PM PDT by
bitt
(We know not what course others may take, but as for me, Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!)
To: bitt
3 posted on
08/12/2018 3:41:37 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: bitt
SCIF actually stands for Secure Compartmentalized Information Facility. I helped build several.
5 posted on
08/12/2018 3:43:07 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: bitt
I’m not sure, but some laws must have been broken by recording the conversation. If so, she should be arrested.
Jeff? You awake, boy?
6 posted on
08/12/2018 3:45:26 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: bitt
WTF was she doing in the SCIF, anyway?
7 posted on
08/12/2018 3:46:20 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(I have already previewed this composition.)
To: bitt
A recording device in a SCIF? I would have been fired for that, or at least lost my SCI clearances. Instead, they are going to build a case against Trump using information obtained (likely out of context) from an illegal activity.
8 posted on
08/12/2018 3:46:51 PM PDT by
CatOwner
To: bitt
Gen Kelly: “And then you can go on without any type of difficulty in the future relative to your reputation. But its very, very important I think that you understand that there are some serious legal issues that have been violated. And youre, youre open to some legal action that we hope, I think, we can control, right?”
Friendly advice...which she promptly ignored and wrote a book. Maybe he should’ve done the presentation in Crayon...
Now, burn the bisch.
9 posted on
08/12/2018 3:48:49 PM PDT by
moovova
To: bitt
What does Omarosa get out of releasing a tape that recorded her sorry ass being fired?
10 posted on
08/12/2018 3:49:41 PM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
(Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
To: bitt
From what I read about this she is lucky that she was not taken out in cuffs instead of just being fired. That is what Kelly was basically say to her. And he had every right to say it. The media is calling it “Threats”.
As for this recording. There is no way she should avoid the Cuffs now.
12 posted on
08/12/2018 3:51:34 PM PDT by
Revel
To: bitt
1856
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.146 📁
Aug 12 2018 12:36:38 (EST)
How STUPID are these PEOPLE?
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/08/12/john-kelly-omarosa-tape-meet-the-press-rs-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/omarosa-manigault/📁
"Integrity violations."
Integrity violations = LEAKS
Recording a 'privileged & confidential' meeting w/ the WH CoS?
What document(s) are signed prior to entering the WH?
What documents(s) were added by POTUS specifically prior to allowing staff to join his administration?
What documents(s) were added later by POTUS specifically targeting 'leaks'?
Why was FAKE NEWS infuriated by this?
[Sample]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-nondisclosure-agreements-came-with-him-to-the-white-house/2018/03/18/226f4522-29ee-11e8-b79d-f3d931db7f68_story.html?utm_term=.0e40ed22d16c📁
https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-trump-made-white-house-senior-staff-sign-ndas📁
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/19/former-officials-slam-reported-white-house-non-disclosure-agreements.html📁
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/03/trump-made-white-house-staff-sign-ndas-to-stop-leaks-report.html📁
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-white-house-staffers-nda-nondisclosure-agreements-pro-bono-851583📁
https://www.quora.com/Can-the-President-require-NDAs-be-signed-by-White-House-staff-as-a-condition-of-employment-Would-they-have-any-force-of-law📁
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/donald-trump-white-house-nondisclosure-agreements/index.html📁
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/03/18/trump-pushed-white-house-staff-sign-non-disclosure-agreements-report/436778002/📁
Why would a person 'openly' broadcast a CRIMINAL VIOLATION?
Do they feel protected?
Who do they report to?
If known in advance, could this be an advantage?
These people are STUPID.
Enjoy the show.
Q
14 posted on
08/12/2018 3:55:28 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: bitt
Prosecute her. Don’t be afraid. Good talking points can be devised by conservatives who are not timid or brain dead.
To: bitt
About 8 years ago I was in a Republican leadership class and we had a private tour of Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ office at the Pentagon. He wasn’t there but we had to leave our phones (cameras) outside.
24 posted on
08/12/2018 4:10:46 PM PDT by
Hildy
(IT'S)
To: bitt
Kelly was completely professional. He told her in so many words that she had broken laws and that he hoped she would not force them to prosecute her for those crimes. So much for that.
28 posted on
08/12/2018 4:20:49 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=400><p> zXSEP5Z xnKL3lW XywCCJd)
To: bitt
So can I assume the NBC will be the first to release the videos of Keith Ellison beating on his girlfriend??
30 posted on
08/12/2018 4:27:06 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
To: bitt
Shes gonna get prosecuted for those recordings.
31 posted on
08/12/2018 4:30:09 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: bitt
“..a secret electronic recording within a SCIF”
She’s toast unless she’s a registered Democrat.
32 posted on
08/12/2018 4:36:31 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: bitt
She was in serious legal jeopardy. Trump/Kelly gave her a door out and all she had to do is obey the non-disclosure agreement. Break it, go to jail.
33 posted on
08/12/2018 4:37:03 PM PDT by
Revolutionary
("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
To: bitt
34 posted on
08/12/2018 4:44:01 PM PDT by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: bitt
Duh, wouldn’t bringing a recording device into the Situation Room for the purpose of taping people be a violation of some kind of law? Seems like that room is a secure area with national interests discussed. People secretly bringing in recording devices could tape things and give them to our enemies. Some of these creeps are not beyond helping our enemies.
38 posted on
08/12/2018 5:16:28 PM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(We are in the Last Days of human history. Jesus is coming back, & soon! Do U know Him?)
To: bitt
She is in violation. Should be facing 10 yrs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson