Posted on 08/06/2018 8:05:06 AM PDT by Liberty7732
The case of new New York Times editorial writer Sarah Jeong’s openly anti-white bigotry is perhaps the most telling example of how far the American left has sprinted from the legacy of Martin Luther King and towards a form of retro racist tribalism that is perhaps as far from the American middle as it is from the American right.
This will either spell the doom of the Democratic Party — or of the American Experiment. Because such concepts cannot survive in an America that resembles anything like the amazing nation that emerged in the second half of the 20th Century.
That America was not just a military and economic colossus, but also a colossus of individual liberties and great, striding steps toward total equality under the law. It drew tens of millions of immigrants from around the world because it was indeed a beacon of hope and opportunity and freedom from oppression.
That entire concept is rapidly becoming antithetical to the diversity-enthralled American left and by extension the Democratic Party. Equal rights? No. Melting pot? No. Law and order? No. Economic opportunity? No. Liberty? No. Individual pursuit of happiness? Well, if the government says it’s OK.
Jeong herself is inconsequential as an individual in all of this. But it’s both the bigoted stew of the increasingly disconnected American power-center elites that she swims in, stirred in with the media/Democratic/leftist defense of her vitriol, that is quite consequential.
As gay moderate Andrew Sullivan astutely observes in the liberal New York Magazine, responding to the defense of Jeong by The Verge:
“…any assertion of racism in Jeong’s tweets as “dishonest and outrageous,” [is] a function of bad faith and an attack on journalism itself. Scroll through left-Twitter and you find utter incredulity that demonizing white people could in any way be offensive. That’s the extent to which loathing of and contempt for “white people” is now background noise on the left. What many don’t seem to understand is that their view of racism isn’t shared by the public at large, and that the defense of it by institutions like the New York Times will only serve to deepen the kind of resentment that gave us Trump.”
Exactly right. And Democrats, the left and the media are so wed to diversity and so blinkered by their hatred of Trump that they cannot see how they are rushing headlong to the aid of the GOP in 2018 and Trump in 2020. By pushing themselves further and further from the vast American center that swings elections, they are providing hope to Republicans who should historically be in a hopeless situation in November.
The Democrats are kindly serving up so many opportunities for Trump and Republicans, just on the racism front — to say nothing of the 73-gender front or socialism front.
The revelation that Obama policy blocked qualified airport control tower candidates who were white, in order to allow room for black candidates — even when positions were open and safety was threatened — got no play at the time in the Obama-cuddly media. And not much since. After all, diversity is king.
Obama’s decision, one of hundreds during his administration, was driven by the social justice platform of identity politics under the label of diversity. The idea is racial redress of past wrongs, but of course it is against people who have done nothing but have the “wrong” color skin — which the vast majority of Americans oppose. When this air control hiring was recently reported in the Wall Street Journal, it became clear that still no one on the left cared as no one on the left sees anything wrong.
In fact, it is part of the groundwork that has been laid for people like Jeong to be despicable bigots and still land a prestige job at the New York Times and be roundly defended by Democrats and the media.
Melinda Gates, who earned her great fortune by saying “I do” to Bill Gates at the altar, decided to start a venture capital fund with the sole purpose of funding minorities and women. No white guys need apply. Further, she declared the reasoning is to promote diversity, and correct racism and sexism in tech companies because white men — “white guy in a hoodie,” in her words — cannot provide products adequately for minorities. Presumably she did not mean her white guy husband, not that guy.
She was applauded by leftist and tech publications. Which is the point.
As Joy Pullman wrote in the Federalist of Gates’ thinking, which is reflected in the broader left:
“…punishing people for the “sins” of their “class” is, quite frankly, of a piece with the ideology that ultimately led to the slaughters of the Bolshevik and French revolutions…”
There is a veritable bottomless pit of these stories. As Trump was trying to reign in the slow-motion disaster of our open borders policies and government’s unwillingness to define who can come into our country, the Washington Post publishes a story under the headline: “Trump immigration plan could keep whites in U.S. majority for up to five more years.”
This “analysis” had one clear objective: Paint immigration in racial terms and color Trump’s immigration policy changes as a way to keep white people in the majority longer. Most Americans, pretty sure including Trump, would never have even considered that element of immigration limitations. They are thinking economic opportunity for low-income Americans, plus national and personal safety for everyone. But the left automatically goes race. It’s the lens through which they see all American life.
Where does all this leave us politically? In the one place that many in the political middle would rather not gravitate to but must: Donald Trump. The President has shown a steadfast willingness to fight back against identity politics, speech censoring political correctness and race-baiting. He’s done it poorly at times and marvelously at times.
If Americans are presented with the choice between traditional Americanism, constitutional rights, individual liberties and a strong economy or anti-white bigotry, anti-Americanism, collectivist hive culture and a feeble economy, it seems like the choice becomes pretty clear. A call to diversity does not win that day when Jeong’s hardcore bigotry is defended by the left and even celebrated by some.
The truth is that Trump and the GOP are the only things standing in the way of a headlong lurch into the violence and slaughterhouse of the Jacobins. Is it really hard to see Maxine Waters as the precursor to Robespierre? If that becomes the choice, the GOP wins. And if that happens in November, it’s truly impossible to predict how the left will react.
But the country might be saved for a little longer.
It’s not the diversity that’s doing it. It’s the outright hate for Whites, the discrimination, the rage, the college courses designed to program minds to eliminate Whites, the tax laws set up to take money from producers and give it to slackers.
Diversity = no whites.
Hopefully it will finish off the NYT too. Not a moment too soon.
Actually, what’s creating more Trump voters is that the Left chas unveiled what it really is.
“White” = Judeo-Christian. You can see that “code” in the hate they also have towards Candice Owens, Clarence Thomas, Kanye West or any minority that dares to run away from the “Plantation”.
Socialists believe government is GOD, and demand we have “no other gods before it”. So those who worship God of the Bible, and refuse to bow to the “collective”, must be silenced... or better yet eliminated. Simple as that!
The Democrat Party is going to be ripped to shreds by racial infighting. All of it’s little balkanized components feel the same way about each other that Sarah Jeong feels about whites.
They may be right in the end. But in the near term they miscalculated on the timing of the disaffection of the white working class. They are jumping ship while they still have numbers and hence some clout.
So we'll see if their remaining coalition of muslim transgender communist illegal immigrant government workers can win them elections in the short term.
Melinda Gates, who earned her great fortune by saying “I do” to Bill Gates at the altar, decided to start a venture capital fund with the sole purpose of funding minorities and women. No white guys need apply. Further, she declared the reasoning is to promote diversity, and correct racism and sexism in tech companies because white men — “white guy in a hoodie,” in her words — cannot provide products adequately for minorities. Presumably she did not mean her white guy husband, not that guy.
Thanks Liberty7732.
The case of new New York Times editorial writer Sarah Jeong’s openly anti white ...”
They’re becoming angrier and angrier and, so, less and less cautious every day...
“They’re becoming angrier and angrier and, so, less and less cautious every day...”
Yes they are, and I believe the reason to be that whites haven’t “taken the bait”, lots of it, that they keep dangling before us, to provoke a white person into reacting with violence. All the violence comes from their side, both white antifa types, and black criminals-the black-on-white murder rate is vastly higher than the opposite, even in raw numbers, much less per capita.
I also believe that it’s no accident that they chose an Asian woman to be the mouthpiece for the day the left came out of the closet with their anti-white hatred, because there’s really not a lot of racial animus between whites and Asians, at least not in the media. It’s not whites shoving qualified Asians out of places at universities in order to make room for “diversity”, and Asians must know this. So per the left’s tried-and-true tactic of “divide and conquer”, they found an Asian female who openly and proudly hates whites, white males, and cops. If anyone looked further, I wouldn’t doubt that they’d find a few anti-Christian diatribes from this mentally ill (ate up with hatred) person, also.
I find it a bit amusing that everything this woman uses to live her First World life, including the technology she uses to spew her anti-white male hatred, wouldn’t exist without white males. But only a bit amusing, because her kind now has the public and unapologetic power of the media and the left behind her, and that’s a lot of power, unfortunately. Her kind are now free to express open hatred of whites, and receive a chorus of “hell yeahs” from all like-minded. No more shrouding it in “white privilege” and other such concepts, just naked hatred of white people.
And still these “oppressed” people can’t get close enough to their “oppressors”, where they live, work, play, everything. If anyone was oppressing me, I’d do my damndest to keep away from them. I certainly wouldn’t move to a country full of those terrible “oppressors”.
bkmk
A violent response is reserved for somebody who physically attacks me.
A deranged woman sitting in New York making nasty tweets does not justify this response.
If there is a Red Wave or just no bluehoo wawve then the left will know it has lost. Will they finally get along to get along or go F N Nutz?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.