Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. says no need for better gas mileage, heavy vehicles safer
The Washington Times ^ | Tuesday, July 31, 2018 | Tom Krisher and Ellen Knickmeyer - Ass Press

Posted on 08/01/2018 5:46:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: shelterguy

“I have a wild idea, let people buy the cars they want.
Let the market decide. Weird concept, right?”

Knock off that conservative approach to the market.

Next you will suggest that we only watch what we want to watch on tv or buy food that we like to eat. :)


41 posted on 08/01/2018 7:51:44 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Mexico's elite/white conquistadors have manipulated & interfered in our elections, since Ike!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

My dream comes true!

Thank you DJT!!!


42 posted on 08/01/2018 7:55:48 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“...In a Yugo.”


43 posted on 08/01/2018 7:55:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

State governments should love big vehicles. Lower fuel mileage = more fuel taxes.


44 posted on 08/01/2018 8:06:39 AM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Newton wins every time.


45 posted on 08/01/2018 8:12:58 AM PDT by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for nuclear power for over 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There is no net safety increase with heavier vehicles. The safety advantage to the occupants of the heavier vehicle is offset by the disadvantage to the occupants of the smaller vehicle.


46 posted on 08/01/2018 8:16:16 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I wouldn’t mind more miles for the gas we use.

The price winds up in cars that cost more and perform differently. CVT transmissions are miserable, but wind up in many cars due to the extra 1-2 mpg they give. Full-sized, naturally aspirated engines are giving way to more expensive turbos that don't give you power from the start. Some folks don't like replacing steel with aluminum in their trucks. These are all coming NOT because of market demand (though the marketers spin as best they can, out of necessity) but because of these regs.
47 posted on 08/01/2018 8:16:59 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Automotive engineer Giorgio Rizzoni of Ohio State University calls the administration’s safety claims “a stretch.”

Really Giorgio??? A Stretch? Since the article doesn’t give us any information on why you think its a stretch... so let me propose this to you Mr. Rozzoni.

Lets strap you into the driver seat of a subcompact, with a 5 star crash rating... I will strap myself into a full size pickup with the lowest safety rating currently in production. We will then proceed to drive at each other at 35 MPH and head on collide.

I am game for this Mr Rozzoni... are you ?


48 posted on 08/01/2018 8:17:16 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gigster

Yeah, like a trash compactor does.


49 posted on 08/01/2018 8:27:43 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gigster

I am still driving my 2003 1500 Ram Quad-Cab with the hemi and consistently get 13.5 MPG. I get real nervous when I have to ride in my friends Hyundai Elantra.


50 posted on 08/01/2018 8:28:10 AM PDT by Sweating_Bullets (You can't tell which way the train went by looking at the tracks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

No comments on the silly claim that people would drive less and therefore be less exposed to getting in a accident?


51 posted on 08/01/2018 8:35:48 AM PDT by Blooms in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Oooooh, you evil capitalist! Lol


52 posted on 08/01/2018 9:15:52 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (End the Mueller Gestapo now. Free the Donald.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

“Get rid of the ethanol in regular gas and mileage goes up at least 10% instantly!”

Also, get rid of the special blends that California has and watch the mileage go up.

Years one of our relatives lived in Portland, and we would drive from California up 5 or the semi coastal route to Oregon. All of the vehicles from an OJ Simpson Bronco to mid size vehicles barely made it to Oregon before needing to be filled up.

On the return trip, I would fill up in Oregon at the border.

Every vehicle without the ethanol and California crud got home with at least a quarter of a tank of gas. If I mixed that with California gas Crud, the mileage increased at least 10% with that tank.

In California we pay sales tax on the cost of gas. So the rectums who run California love higher gas costs as that brings in more sales tax $’s.


53 posted on 08/01/2018 9:17:28 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Mexico's elite/white conquistadors have manipulated & interfered in our elections, since Ike!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

To MR Engineer at Ohio State:

SORRY-—BUT YOU ARE WRONG. It is NOT a ‘stretch’ regarding safety.

I drive a 1976 Chevy 1 ton dually truck & a 1979 Buick station wagon.

They are made of STEEL !!!! REAL STEEL !!!

I just drove 60 miles R/T to go pay my property taxes at the county seat. Buick runs like a watch. No problems.

IF anyone gets into a tangle with me in one of those new plastic fantastic cars, I win. The law of Gross Tonnage is on my side.


54 posted on 08/01/2018 10:34:28 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Trump needs to know this. You are totally correct.

I have a car I have driven for 37 years & a truck I have driven for 32 years. Ethanol eats into my mileage.


55 posted on 08/01/2018 10:41:13 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

There is no net safety increase with heavier vehicles. The safety advantage to the occupants of the heavier vehicle is offset by the disadvantage to the occupants of the smaller vehicle.”””

I really don’t give a rat’s behind about the stupid people willing to gamble on their smaller, plastic vehicle. I am only interested in how I fare in a collision.

I drive a Chevy 1 ton dually truck 454 with 4 speed Granny low & a 1979 Buick station wagon.

Paid for, cheaper insurance, and lower registrations.

Not worn out yet, either, Truck has over 348,000 miles on it & I put over 250,000 of those miles on it. Car has 214,000 miles.


56 posted on 08/01/2018 10:45:09 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

#24 Some of the reflective tape on my bumper got dislodged.

Very good tape!
Flex Tape
https://shopsimpleus.com/assets/htb1q7hmspxxxxx2xxxxq6xxfxxxa.jpg


57 posted on 08/01/2018 11:17:24 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

It is quit astonishing that Trump and the DOE are buying further into the ethanol and biomass boondoggle.


58 posted on 08/01/2018 11:35:07 AM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory; All

Whoever came up with that ******* corn gas mandate should be put to death!

It isn’t what it does to gas mileage and your car, that crap destroys small engines!


59 posted on 08/01/2018 1:53:23 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals can kiss my bitter clingers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson