Posted on 07/24/2018 7:21:19 AM PDT by econjack
Clinton Foundation
A "Charitable Foundation" Downsizes!
Charitable Foundation? Really?
Have you wondered why the Clinton Foundation folded so suddenly after Hillary was no longer in a position of influence? Perhaps this summary will provide some insight?
From their 2014 990 Tax Form; they list 486 employees (line 5)!
It took 486 people who are paid $34.8 million and $91.3 million in fees and expenses, to give away $5.1 MILLION
The real heart of the Clintons can be seen here. Staggering but not surprising. These figures are from an official copy of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation for the tax year 2014. The copy of the tax return is from the National Center for Charitable Statistics web site http://nccs.urban.org/ . You can obtain the latest tax return on any charitable organization there.
The Clinton Foundation: Number of Employees (line 5) 486
Total revenue (line 12): $177,804,612.00
Total grants to charity (line 13) $5,160,385.00 (this is less than 3%)
Total expenses of $91,281,145.00
Expenses include:
Salaries (line 15) $34,838,106.00
Fund raising fees (line 16a) $850,803.00
Other expenses (line 17) $50,431,851.00 HUH??????
Travel: $8,000,000.00
Note: $20 Million in Travel & Meetings to decide who gets the $5.160 Million in Charity ?
Meetings: $12,000,000.00
Net assets/fund balances (line 22) $332,471,349.00... So it required 486 people, who were paid $34.8 million, plus $91.3 million in fees and expenses, to give away $5.1 MILLION!
And they call this a CHARITY?
(It is alleged that this is one of the greatest white-collar crimes ever committed. And just think — one of the participants was a former president and one (gasp!) wanted to be elected president of the United States.
If justice was truly served they would both be in prison).
Bkmrk.
Does Sessions know about this?
Hilliary's liquor and meds bill...................
This would explain why the law will never touch them. How do you prosecute CIA operatives under U.S. law for operating with the complicity of the U.S. government?
“The Clintons have been on a damn near 30 year crime spree and people think 30 years worth of criminal activity can be gone through, in absolute completion, with a fine tooth comb in less than 2 years?”
No government organization could...call BDO.
This is not out of line for any large charity actually. United Way, Red Cross, etc. They all collect massive revenue in the form of charitable contributions and distribute pennies on the dollar to the needy. The rest goes into exec's pockets.
The only way they can stay in business (and, it's exactly that, viz. a business) is they count on people ignoring the scam, but who continue to give just to make themselves feel good.
Just for kicks and further enlightenment.
Google “Charles Ortel, Jason Goodman, Clinton Foundation, youtube”
There are about eighty (80) videos outlining the potential crimes and misdeeds at the Clinton Foundation.
“...Does Sessions know about this?...”
He is still hiding under his desk. Useless parasite.
Who are the insane that give the Clintons $177,804,612.00 ?
People who want access to the $4+ trillion US annual budget that Hillary promised to be in charge of. It’s just business.
Don’t forget the Chelsea Clinton Global Yoga and Grandchildren Foundation, I’m sure they got their cut.
Conclusion........the Clinton’s are spies.the most NOT undercover spies ever.
You are likely ahead of me, here...
One strongly suspects that these crimes and corruptions are so widely spread, so deep, and so large that their only chance of escaping is to change the subject with daily (fictional) horror stories.
And, the thing is...
(and this is the best part)...
They are likely just making it worse for themselves...
...Your link takes me to a left-wing organization factcheck.org?...
Yeah, WTH?
We have to dig for this story? No thanks, econjack
Your link was posted incorrectly.
I don't know exactly how they spent the money but the $5.1M to charity number doesn't mean much. It just represents how much the foundation donated to other charities.
The story is that they spent the vast amount of the money doing charitable work directly, but I have no idea how efficiently they did it.
>
Not a great deal, but this didn’t come from some foundation, or business group....it was an actual government.
>
Incorrect. It was/is the Fed. TAXPAYERS
As for the ‘not a great deal’, might wish to task those whose property/time/blood/sweat/etc. it came from.
Not a dig on you, personally, just a pet-peeve. It’s those glaring falsities that lose the discussion from the 1st word.
Link?
plus they’re kiting charitable donation from their personal income to their foundation then foundation to foundation deducts
clever these Clintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.