Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What do you do with the freeloaders who will automatically protest the conflict?
1 posted on 07/04/2018 8:14:12 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Libloather
What do you do with the freeloaders who will automatically protest the conflict?

(raises hand) ...Ummm, put them in no-man's land where *both* sides can take potshots at them?

2 posted on 07/04/2018 8:17:25 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

communist dems qant people killing people at least at some level. It would give them additional reassuence that all of their hard worj is coming to frutatuon


3 posted on 07/04/2018 8:20:31 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The left wants to be rid of Trump and the deplorables who elected him.

The right recognizes that the left wants them dead.

Guess who has been buying all those guns.......


4 posted on 07/04/2018 8:21:17 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A second civil war is exactly what Soros had in mind when he colluded with the Deep State and DC UniParty to place Obama in the White House.

The problem is that under Trump, the lot of minorities has become measurably better, and you can tell that by the way the race hustlers and pimps are screaming bloody murder.

Had the Coughing Felon been greased into power, we would be trembling on the brink of open warfare, right now!


5 posted on 07/04/2018 8:24:29 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (The Democrats in California want another civil war over cheap labor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Can anyone answer this honest question?

How can Americans be harmonious and united again?

This implies not a perfect union but at least some semblance of “we are all Americans and we are together on this matter” such as in the 1950s and early 1960s when the melting pot did not benefit all people equally but at least didn’t entail beating people up at political gatherings or refusing to accept any differences of viewpoint at family gatherings.

Where do we go from here to avoid physical war?


7 posted on 07/04/2018 8:37:47 AM PDT by frank ballenger (End non-citizen voting ,vote fraud & leftist media news censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

For the Marxist jihad, compromise is blasphemy. Anything short of total victory is unacceptable.


8 posted on 07/04/2018 8:41:31 AM PDT by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho) to sun spots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
In America, talk of another civil war inevitably brings comparison to the last one, the fratricidal maelstrom that raged from 1861 to 1865. That eminently avoidable conflict, which thanks to political paralysis and stupidity wasn’t avoided, took the lives of roughly a million Americans. Since our country’s population then was about 31 million, that would be equivalent to the deaths of more than 10 million Americans today.

I asked, "well what is going to happen to those people we can't reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?" and the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated.

And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers.

And when I say "eliminate," I mean "kill."

Twenty-five million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.

And they were dead serious.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/eliminating_25_million_america.html#ixzz5KIiQdQx4 Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

10 posted on 07/04/2018 8:41:42 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

This one will be more like the Spanish Civil War than the American Civil War.


12 posted on 07/04/2018 8:47:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I am tired of “both of you be civil.” It is like dealing with Stalinists or Nazis who are already making plans for their concentration camps and have already estimated how many people they will kill, and we are supposed to be “civil” and “understanding” with them.


14 posted on 07/04/2018 8:56:24 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
A Divided America Does Not Mean Civil War

When it turns violent, it does! And, it has been turning more and more violent, mostly by the democRATS/leftists/Communists/Socialists.

15 posted on 07/04/2018 8:56:48 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Boycott The NFL! Molon Labe! Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Here’s the thing: One side believes that whatever is in their head IS the Law. The WRITTEN law means NOTHING to these people. There are many of them in gov’t, academics and media. They LITERALLY believe that ONLY Nazis differ with themselves. Literally (as in really).


24 posted on 07/04/2018 10:03:12 AM PDT by TalBlack (It's hard to shoot people when they are shooting back at you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The war has already begun.

It is just in the early stages so far.

The left has already begun to make war against those who do not agree with them.

They are killing policemen, shunning and excluding people from speaking, dining, posting on social media, etc.

Think of how the Jewish people were shunned and killed in the 1930’s and how that ended up.


25 posted on 07/04/2018 10:10:42 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats. - P.J. ORourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Perhaps of interest.


27 posted on 07/04/2018 2:08:43 PM PDT by Joe Brower (Nothing is more terrifying than ignorance in action. Particulary when that ignorance is cultivated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

This is a bunch of mush.


29 posted on 07/04/2018 3:07:17 PM PDT by Luke21 (The Hill sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Not yet, anyway.


30 posted on 07/04/2018 3:29:22 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Ah, the old "the military will put it down" argument. The author should check his own figures. 1.3 million active duty personnel spread over 50 states is quite a different proposition from the occasional activation of the National Guard in times of rioting. Those weren't civil wars.

We are, at the moment, experiencing isolated cases of violence, but what is different is the intense media campaigns that have been raging and show no sides of abating, that encourage more and defend the violent by deliberately twisting the news to justify their violence and generate sympathy for the offenders. That is a very bad and dangerous development, and violence spread that way isn't going to be stamped out by a few Guardsmen.

The Rwandan genocide was whipped up, controlled, and justified by a single radio station, RTLM, Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines, three of whose managers are now serving 30+ year sentences for the violence they provoked, incorporating between 500,000 and one million deaths. This sort of thing can get out of hand very quickly and the soldiers couldn't stop it.

31 posted on 07/04/2018 3:44:49 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

This guy’s problem is that he cannot distinguish good from evil.

“None can deny that Americans increasingly despise each other over politics”

The good grow angrier with the evil, and vice versa. However, it is right for good to despise evil, but wrong for evil to despise good. It doesn’t “go both ways.”

“Partisans of all stripes embrace secular ideologies with the fervor of old-time fundamentalist religion”

Religion is a part of all this; or, at least, God is. One side wishes to obey God, the other despises Him. Despite the failures and weaknesses of those who try to follow God, there is no moral equivalence with those who brazenly, willfully strive to defy Him.

“egged on by the rabble-rousing preachers of Fox News and MSNBC, disguised as newsreaders”

Here we have an imperfect source, Fox, which gets some things right some of the time, to be compared with a source that thinks lying in the source of evil is laudable. How are these comparable?

Even if we want to draw an equivalence on the grounds that Fox is not perfect, we are jerked up at the end of our chain by the fact that the author is not criticizing Fox for getting things wrong. He is objecting to the part of Fox’s output that makes the left look bad—that is, the truth.

He’s saying that MSNBC is a little too doctrinaire on the left, while Fox goes too far to the right. Yes, I agree: Fox goes far enough to the right that the truth begins to appear. That’s what the author is objecting to.

He is saying that the LSM, who knowingly and maliciously deceive people with the intent of harming them, are equivalent to those who sincerely attempt to tell the truth in the interest of helping people.


32 posted on 07/04/2018 4:16:16 PM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

uhh….yeah, it does, when one side has gone over the edge and is absolutely friggin’ NUTS.


33 posted on 07/05/2018 5:50:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A more accurate headline would be A Civil War Doesn’t Have to be Violent.


37 posted on 07/05/2018 8:21:07 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

bump


41 posted on 07/05/2018 4:56:25 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson