So it is impossible to do this but it is still law. Sounds like typical California logic.
We need a law requiring stupidity tracing technology in our court “judges”. “Supreme” my @$$. Should be called the Florida Stupidity Court.
But impossibility does not authorize a court to go beyond interpreting a statute and simply invalidate it.
_________________________________________________________
But isn’t this what Brown vs. Board of Education did? It said that “separate-but-equal” was IMPOSSIBLE to achieve and thus laws enacting racial segregation of public facilities are Unconstitutional.
Maybe I’m missing something.
This can easily be overturned in the Federal Courts...although obviously not by the 9th Circus.
But impossibility does not authorize a court to go beyond interpreting a statute and simply invalidate it.”
Read that sentence twice. These people are nuts.
ML/NJ
People will buy their guns and ammo ‘elsewhere’................
Ping!.............
Given that it is impossible, this restriction amounts to “infringement” of the 2nd Amendment.
What happens if I use brass that I pick up at the range, for my reloads?
Only in lala land.
Unenforceable, won’t BE enforced, but will stay on the books.
How is this any different from requiring people to jump through hoops to practice free speech ?
Gun manufacturers should cease doing any business with any government entity in California.
30 seconds with a file...
I’m okay with the california law and hope that state confiscates guns there. Be less people shooting back in this upcoming civil war
It will be overruled at SCOTUS as it violates the 2nd A, how?
The technology is not 100% or near 100% feasible or reliable. Therefore, it stands to reason that all reliable and effective ammunition would be outlawed under this California decision.
Thus, the decision attempts to defeat the meaning and intent of the 2nd Amendment.
Every single gun manufacturer should refuse to do any business with any entity of California Government right down to the smallest local police or sheriffs department.
Not one more gun or spare part.
Not one.
L
“The gun law, passed in 2007, is supported by police organizations...”
Supported by left wing democrat hack political chiefs.
On the technology side, this is an interesting concept--a microstamp on the firing pin? That puts the mark on the primer or the rim in the case of a 22LR. A very small mark.
Impact? Well, if someone doesn't police their brass, the police will and can then trace the gun. I'm not sure that I really have a problem with this for new guns once the technology exists. The challenge is that it can never apply to existing guns which makes the value limited as there are hundreds of millions of guns in circulation.
Gun Makers will simply stop selling new guns in California.
There are plenty of used guns to go around.