and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!
i long for the day i can rretire this one... 
Posted on 06/27/2018 12:45:29 PM PDT by lightman
Educators in ActionWorker Rights June 27, 2018 • 10:23AM Supreme Court Ruling in ‘Janus’ Deals Blow to Working Families
By John Rosales
The collective voice of American workers was undermined today by the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. American Federation of County, State Municipal Employees.
In a 5-to-4 decision, which casts aside decades of precedents and laws, the court has eliminated a public-sector union’s ability to collect “fair share” or “agency” fees from workers who choose not to join as union members but are still protected by union agreements. The ruling undermines the ability of educators to come together and bargain collectively on behalf of students.
“A strong union and collective bargaining agreements are what help to ensure students receive the tools and resources they need to succeed in school and in life,” says NEA President Lily Eskelsen García. “We’ve seen it in the resources available to our students, and we have felt it in our paychecks.”
The ruling comes in a case that has been bankrolled by corporate interests wanting to rig the economic system further in their favor while robbing teachers, education support professionals (ESP), higher education faculty, corrections officers, sanitation and other workers of the freedom to join together to earn a decent living, provide for their families, and advocate for the needs of students.
“All over the country, they are cutting funding for arts and PE, up-to-date textbooks, recess, and class sizes that allow for one-on-one instruction,” says Eskelsen García. “Many of our schools have faced serious funding cuts that are likely to grow even worse. Collective bargaining has been a critical tool to push back against these cuts and demand the resources our students deserve.
Fair-share fees help cover the cost of union representation and bargaining services that support high quality public schools and benefit employees by ensuring that their union can strongly advocate for them. This court decision comes as millions of American workers recommit to their unions and launch new organizing drives, and as support for labor unions has risen to its highest level in years.
“Regardless of today’s Supreme Court decision, we must remain united and make it clear that no court decision can stop our union,” says Denise Specht, president of Education Minnesota (EM). “Neither this ruling nor the right-wing groups that will weaponize it, will silence the voices of Minnesota’s professional educators.”
A strong union and collective bargaining agreements are what help to ensure students receive the tools and resources they need to succeed in school and in life. We’ve seen it in the resources available to our students, and we have felt it in our paychecks.” – NEA President Lily Eskelsen García
The Janus decision will affect millions of workers in the nearly half of the states that require payments from nonmembers to cover the cost of collective bargaining.
“We will still stand for effective and welcoming schools for our students, proud and healthy communities for their parents, and salaries and benefits that will sustain the families of Minnesota educators and those across the nation,” Specht says.
The National Education Association, the nation’s largest union with more than 3 million members, filed an amicus brief in the case with the American Association of University Professors and many NEA affiliates. The brief highlighted the radical nature of the plaintiff’s arguments, including their legally unsupported claim that public-sector collective bargaining itself is constitutionally suspect.
The claimant, Mark Janus, is an Illinois state social worker. He argues that his First Amendment liberties were violated because he had to pay an agency fee to the union even though he is not a member and might disagree with its political policies.
In 1977, the court’s unanimous decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education said localities and states could authorize public-employee unions to charge nonmembers for the cost of collective bargaining (fair share fees) but not for the union’s political activities. By overturning Abood, the court eliminated non-members’ fair share fees, though unions are still required by law to represent them. As a result of the decision, some workers will now have to make up for the costs others inflict on the union but decline to pay for. Allowing some employees to opt out of paying their fair share for union representation will make it harder for all public employees to advocate for the quality services that everyone depends on.
But this case was never about merits or law. It was about politics and rigging the system, economy, and democracy in favor of the wealthy and corporate CEOs.
“Strong unions build strong schools and strong communities,” says Alex Price, band director and instrumental music teacher, Belmont High School and Wright Brothers Middle School in Dayton, Ohio. “Fine arts programs were being cut from my school and students were missing out on subjects like arts and music. My union negotiated with the district to bring back music so our students could have a well-rounded curriculum.”
When some school principals tried to renege on the agreement, “as a union, we stepped in,” says Price, a member of the Dayton Education Association. “Educators came together through our union and spoke out for what our kids need.”
Public opinion of teachers’ unions is robust. According to a recent NPR/Ipsos poll, two-thirds of those polled approve of teachers’ unions, three-quarters approve of educators’ right to strike, and just one in four believe educators in this country are paid fairly. Take the #RedForEd pledge and stand with NEA as we continue to build a strong union that advocates for the opportunity students need to succeed.
Recent #RedforEd actions in states like West Virginia, Arizona, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Kentucky have highlighted how educators are leading a nationwide movement to better fund our schools and better support our students. This action is yielding not only public support but measurable wins for students and educators as well as gains in members. NEA membership is at its highest level in the past five years, including fast growth in states where anti-union laws already exist.
Some 39 briefs signed on to by hundreds of amici — representing all levels of government, public officials, civil rights organizations, academic experts, and others — were filed with the court in support of the respondents. Weighing in on the case have been 22 states and the District of Columbia, dozens of cities, and several dozen Republican lawmakers. School district and public hospitals also exhibited their support of fair share fees as helping to boost the effective management of public services.
For more information about the case, including links to “friend of the court” briefs, editorial columns by experts opposing the lawsuit, and other data, go to www.neatoday.org/janus.
How is stopping you from stealing money from working families a blow to them? Looks like YOU got the education this time!
The DNC is the one that will be hurting.
They have never in their history bargained on behalf of students.
“The ruling undermines the ability of educators to come together and bargain collectively on behalf of students.”
That’s a lie. Or the writer was substituting students for unions.
5.56mm
“The ruling undermines the ability of educators to come together and bargain collectively on behalf of students.”
Students don’t need bargainers, they need those who can actually teach them.
Or teachers.
Otherwise the journalist lied.
Has nothing to do with students.
5.56mm
Tell it to taxpayers who can’t or have to sell at a loss because said taxpayers can’t afford confiscatory property taxes...
The ruling undermines the ability of educators to come together and bargain collectively on behalf of students. Wha....What. Students don’t get squat.
The premise is wrong.
Unions are organizations of political hacks
Err, wrong, John RosalesIdiot!
How do you spell poop?
N E A
I consider the NEA to be perhaps THE most destructive organization in America. Anything that damages them is good.
Guy above me in the SEIU mid-1970s, “Unions are a necessary evil”.
While it wasn’t the clip I was looking for this will at least entertain and is somewhat relevant.
The one I was looking for is the one where Humphreys reveals that the purpose of government departments is to serve those with a vested interest, so the education department serves the needs and wants of the teachers unions. Not the parents or students.
Yes Minister, If The Right People Don’t Have Power: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gmOvEwtDycs
Sorry. Had to stop here.
.
This ruling is 100% a boost for all families!
Finally an end is in sight for Democrats buying state legislatures.
.
i long for the day i can rretire this one...
This is truly a historic day, but until ALL States are Right to Work, unions will still be able to extort money from workers forced to join private sector unions.
The 4 Judges that voted against this decision are communist supporters.
https://nrtwc.org/facts/right-work-mean/
Taft Hartley used to require union leaders to swear that the were not supporters of the communist party.
This provision was overturned in 1965.
Okay, so make these non-union folks NOT be protected by the union agreements.
Or set up union dues on a tier system that has money going for just bargaining, or bargaining and political donations.
You know there are easy solutions to this but the union will not do tem because they dont want workers to have more say in how the unions use their dues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.