Posted on 04/25/2018 10:32:40 PM PDT by bitt
This is far too epic-worthy not to achieve a bit more attention.
Twitter handle IWillRedPillYou did a little digging on the more nuanced aspects from last nights State Dinner, held by President Trump and Melania Trump to honor French President Macron and Brigitte Macron, and discovered a hilarious detail:
Get this: The China (dinette set) Trump Ordered Used Tuesday Night for the Macron Dinner? Same China Bill and Hillary Clinton STOLE from the White House and Were Forced to Return (Dead Serious Trump = Master Troll) [Tweet Link]
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Epic First Lady Melania Trump Selected Clinton China Service, Previously Stolen by Bill and Hillary, For First State Dinner
THANKS, EDZO4
This would make the Clintons the trolls
Steal china - thats what trailer trash does...
Who was more trashy, the Clintons or the Obamas?
Breathlessly awaiting the CTH haters... or are they napping??
~W
To ne, this sends a very in-your-face message to HilLIARY and those in the government who have been and are now working to destroy the Trump presidency:
You think you can steal what rightly belongs to the American people, but we will NOT let you get away with it!
Funny how the media have tried to just say “a mix of china service, glassware and dinnerware from the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations,” glossing right past the fact that this was THE china service taken by the Clintons that they were forced to return.
How so?
Clintons are more trashy
Obamas more treasonous
For the original FR articles that exposed the theft of White House property go to my home page and browse my archives.
“Who was more trashy, the Clintons or the Obamas?”
The Clintons, hands down.
The main course was lamb?
yuck
Sacrificial ?
$28K? Must have been a gift for advertising, and thats the freight. I dont know the total number of settings required for the White House, but its a lot and $28K aint gonna get it done. Something missing here.
I am not a CTH hater. Actually, I have perused the site quite a lot.
I object to sundance invoking Occam’s Razor even while he violates it. He mounts supposition upon supposition, and treats it then as a chain of facts.
I read it for specific information, and separate that from most of the conclusions. I have studied logic and debate, and the philosophy of logic. I form my own conclusions.
As an ordained minister, I have a tendency to distrust the honor of any and all in positions of power. History is on my side.
I trust the Lord Jesus Christ. I do not trust Sessions. I do not trust Q. I do not trust sundance.
Holy
REASON #3:
So she could complete the silver pattern she stole back in 2000
You have obviously never had good lamb.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=er3GPnZys7s
Make it with this as a side.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kvPati1jwQ
Then try this with ground lamb: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW-PDbGJTBY
Sacrificial ?
"The Medium Is The Message"
-- Marshall McLuhan
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.