Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All that optimism for hot first-quarter economic growth is rapidly fading away
cnbc ^ | 3/14/18 | Jeff Cox

Posted on 03/14/2018 1:06:52 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper

Back in late January the Atlanta Fed was calling for a 5.4 percent GDP gain, but on Wednesday it said growth likely will be just 1.9 percent.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; gdp; jobs; money; stockmarket; trumpeconomy
Hm. This isn't media spin, it is just reporting a backtrack from the FED.

So is the Fed worried? Was the Fed guilty of hubris in January?

Trump is right to demand fair trade from other nations, so maybe the experts are a little too skittish to think he can accomplish his goal.

thoughts?

1 posted on 03/14/2018 1:06:52 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Unexpected......................


2 posted on 03/14/2018 1:08:08 PM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Wait a minute. If it’s from CNBC it must be true. Right?


3 posted on 03/14/2018 1:08:16 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Weather


4 posted on 03/14/2018 1:10:04 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Please Pray For My Brother Ken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

No, has nothing to do with CNBC. This is what the threat of slapping tariffs will do. Unlike what Trump says, trade wars are not easy to win. How does raising prices on the American consumer lead to prosperity? The market is expecting retaliatory tariffs hence the drag on growth.


5 posted on 03/14/2018 1:14:57 PM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people -Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This is strictly anecdotal, but here it is.

For the past several years during the middle of March or thereabouts, Mrs. abb & I go to New Orleans. We come before it gets too hot, and after Mardi Gras when the hotel rates are better. We visit the WW2 Museum, the Cabildo Louisiana State Museum, shopping at the Riverwalk, etc.

But mostly we go to enjoy the restaurants, arguably among the best food in the world.

This year, the place is swarming with people. Restaurants have waiting lines that we’ve never seen before. The French Quarter was bustling with people at mid-morning, again something we’ve never seen.

At dinner last night, we asked our waiter about it. He said since the first of the year, “it’s been crazy busy.”

We asked the hotel manager, and he mentioned conventions, but the folks we’ve seen in the quarter don’t look like convention types, just regular folks.


6 posted on 03/14/2018 1:28:59 PM PDT by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

When the Fed raises the cost of borrowing money, money is less likely to be borrowed.


7 posted on 03/14/2018 1:37:50 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Hey, Rocky--Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/27/did-bureau-of-economic-analysis-sandbag-report-on-4th-qtr-u-s-gdp/


8 posted on 03/14/2018 1:41:24 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey
1. Trade war is not a given - The most repeated statement in the collective analysis thus far asserts that an all out trade war will soon follow the implementation of the tariffs. Certainly in theory a nation that faces import tariffs to the United States could retaliate. But variables on a combination of factors would be a more probable cause for such. With steel we are looking specifically at China-whose steel industry is in part supported by government subsidies and a labor market that can be paid pennies on the dollar for the work necessary. This alone prevents the discussion of “free trade” being in any way “fair,” because China is cheating. China is also dependent for the USA to be a recipient of up to 20% of their total export volume. Our steel production suffers as they cheat. But they do not have the total upper hand.

2. Products may not cost more - The assumption that our products will go up significantly in price is a realistic concern. But it is not an absolute given. In the immediate period of implementation according to some of the best estimates the tariffs may raise the purchase price of a new car something close to $45, and a twenty-four pack of beer by .05 cents. But what happens if steel & aluminum production begins to match volume wise the amount we import from other world sources? Economics 101 teaches us that prices drop as inventory surges. If our steel production grows enough we could wipe out the gains mix-minused in our dependence on China.

3. The world doesn’t like it - Of all the pushback this reasoning is among some of the most inane. When the United States does what we have to do to shore up our markets, jobs, workers, and life we have less and less need to care what the world thinks about it. This isn’t hubris, this is independence. To be tied to China’s cheap steel, Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves, and the good graces of the global community fundamentally puts us at a more vulnerable position from an economic & national security standpoint. Like much of the rest of the Trump focus, America needs to shore up America’s capacity for whatever faces us, and being utterly dependent upon others doesn’t move us in that direction.

4. We shouldn’t pick winners & losers - This is an argument normally made when discussing competition between domestic companies here in the USA. Jonathan Hoenig, appearing on Neil Cavuto on Friday, repeatedly invoked this as some sort of determining factor as to why the tariffs should be prevented. But it’s an illegitimate argument. This isn’t picking one steel factory over another and using tax-payer incentives to cause one or the other to succeed. This is a fight for survival between a metal industry that has suffered enormous loss for the better part of multiple decades, and the slave labor of China. The winners in the near term are steel and aluminum workers.

5. The national security consideration - Those that have argued that a trade war is inevitable, seem to also forget the increasingly perilous hair trigger of real war that the globe is constantly on the edge of. If America were to find itself drawn into a conflict with North Korea or Iran, it is likely whatever degree of imports we get from China and Russia would immediately be frozen. Fifteen years ago more than a dozen aluminum smelters were in operation. Today there are only three and the entire capacity of one of those three is necessary just for the military and related technologies. We are more vulnerable than necessary, and increasing domestic production solves this vulnerability.

6. Had to be (as it was) done in the correct sequence - Because of the rapid growth of the economy by rolling back some 2000+ regulations coupled with the very real impact that Trump tax reform is having now is the absolute right time to push for this “leveling of the playing field.” Most Americans will be more likely to accept an increase in the price of their next car by $45 if they know that Americans are benefitting. They are even more so if they have on average $90 more per week appearing in their pay

9 posted on 03/14/2018 1:42:02 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: central_va

What an exceptional presentation. Thank you for sharing!


10 posted on 03/14/2018 2:10:04 PM PDT by Portcall24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey

Makes some sense if all the parties comply not the case.


11 posted on 03/14/2018 2:48:08 PM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It’s a setup.

How could unemployment be so low, factory orders so high, etc?


12 posted on 03/14/2018 3:33:17 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Further...Being off the mark by that much would prove a whole bunch of other things.

Not buying it.


13 posted on 03/14/2018 3:34:30 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

First, the part of the announcement to note carefully:

[…] The Bureau emphasized that the fourth-quarter advance estimate released today is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to further revisionby the source agency (see “Source Data for the Advance Estimate” on page 3). The “second” estimate for the fourth quarter, based on more complete data, will be released on February 28, 2018.

Equivocators!!!

The article spells out the rest.

We end up 3.6-4’sh percent....


14 posted on 03/14/2018 4:14:41 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

There were several threads here touting the high GDPNow figure that was based on a single data point. We saw this trend with the 4Q17 numbers as well - a high reading based on the first data point and more moderation as more came in. I warned people not to get too excited about that first number. I’m sure we’ll see this again in late April when they kick off the 2Q18 tracking.


15 posted on 03/14/2018 6:24:07 PM PDT by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I understand where you are coming from and I too believe Trumps tax cuts and (the start of) deregulation is welcome and will prove to be beneficial. However a lot of what you say is based on hope and not on proven economic facts and history.

Will a trade war erupt? Most likely it will because countries have in the past, retaliated against tariffs. There is a chance they may not this time but I wouldn't hold my breath. Besides, the major steel/aluminum exporters are Brazil, Canada & Mexico. Chinese steel is less that 3% of our imparts. Even with the Chinese "threat" our steel production was up last year as was profits for US Steel companies. As a side note- Should other countries have slapped additional tariffs on GM productions when Obama bailed them out in 2009? It is/was government subsidies that enabled them to sell their product at a price lower than Honda or Toyota?

Products will cost more - there is just no way around that. When you eliminate cheaper alternatives prices have to rise. That's just an empirical truth.

We definitely are picking winners and losers. Why steel? Why not cars? Computers? The point is, it's not the free market (i.e. the American consumer) that determines the winner and loser.

Speak for yourself when you say that Americans will pay more because it's made in America. The average American consumer sure doesn't feel that way based on the products that are being purchased. I'll speak for myself and say I go for the best value (doesn't necessarily mean the cheapest) and if that means buying from other countries then so be it. If you want my hard earned dollars, then make a better product.

The most disappointing thing to me is that this short sighted policy can very well undo all of President Trump's economic accomplishments.

16 posted on 03/15/2018 4:39:33 AM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people -Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey
Will a trade war erupt?

The trade war erupted 40 years ago, and we are losing.

Sir I ask, how can I have an intelligent conversation about trade when your starting position is so ridiculous - ignorant? Can't you just admit that the USA IS IN A TRADE WAR NOW? After 4 decades of deficits, and and a trade imbalance reaching almost a trillion annually, can we start there?

17 posted on 03/15/2018 5:01:40 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson