Posted on 01/22/2018 3:59:44 PM PST by RoosterRedux
This entire shutdown exercise was Schumers attempt to put Trump in his place. He failed spectacularly.
Jan 22 2018 14:16:08 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127256
>>127246
Thank you for visiting the WH. FEAR.
Q
580
Jan 22 2018 14:13:04
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd 127218
Private exchange [last].
Q
381
Jan 22 2018 14:05:49
Q
!UW.yye1fxo ID: f2d4bd
127154
:stay at home<
[-7]
DR_noon_clear_sky^
Safe comms_SAT-re_Bz985300^00
Q
Jan 21 2018
578
Jan 21 2018 22:32:11
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fe774d
121147
Every [3] letter is here.
You are in the middle of some
thing historic. Q
577
Jan 21 2018 22:20:15
Anonymous ID: c4d817
120926
GUYS- email was sent out by NSA before election with some plausible deniability attached to it so people could say "FAKE"! HOWEVER, the main audience wasn't normies, it was the black hats, a shot across the bow to say "WE HAVE IT ALL, YOUR'E RIGGING WON'T WORK". Q just brought it back up to speak directly to "THEM" again to show they are going to dump it all.
Q’s style is very much like the age old tradition of the Socratic method. Based on the same principle.
A cryptic message forces the audience into active analysis, which leads to the process of finding their own conclusions.
One of the most powerful methods of persuasion.
Rational people patiently seeking the truth in all this have not as combative as you have been throughout these threads.
CGato
Nowhere does Q state that Huma or the Podestas will be indicted. For God's sake, you read it and tell me what it says.
Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/22/18 (Mon) 21:37:35 No.53
Drones over US.
Tracking only.
Q
........
Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/22/18 (Mon) 21:39:22 No.54
Drones over US.
Tracking only.
[]
Q
Just posted
“Can you explain what this is? “
I wonder about that too.
This entire “Q” thing is really strange.
.
I know what you mean. Even it if somehow Q is just a pretender. I think that it has waken a lot of people up. I really trend toward Q being real however.
Dr Jordan Peterson (youtube) notes that IF a person IS "disagreeable," THEN they will WANT to win a competition.
Hence they are compelled to pick fights and to vainly do all they can to win them--usually by intimidation, arrogance etc. The men are probably trying to prove who has the longer manhood. The women may be trying to prove who is smarter or more clever or some such.
I'm just weary of their ignorance and general level of lack of perceptiveness ... and too often, of their stupidity.
Feelings have nothing/zero to do with it. There is simply a fundamental difference between the way people defend the truth and the way people defend a hoax. I’ve observed this over a period of decades. To see an illustration, take global warming. You wouldn’t even need the facts to know it’s a hoax. Just look at the way the true believers try to destroy, slander and silence the “deniers.” That alone tells you global warming is a fraud.
People who have the truth use facts, evidence and logic. They steer clear of ad hominem bc it only interferes with their desire to set forth the factual argument for the truth. All they ask is a polite forum in which to make their case—and questions are always welcome; they provide an additional opportunity to lay out the facts.
Again, I’ve seen the methods used here tonight. Personal attacks of ‘deniers,’ have been the rule, not the exception. I’ve drawn the only conclusion possible.
I just refreshed https://qcodefag.github.io/index.html but didn’t see anything about drones. Lots about the site being attacked and security tests though.
The Q site on “8chan” has now been taken down. Just before it went down, Q indicated that the site was under attack. Q also made mention of “drones over America” (tracking only).
Nonsense. WE are human, not robots. Sheesh. Your ‘Vision of the Whole’ seems to be rather lacking.
Oh sh*t is right. Discussing the assassination of our President or a member of his family??? That’s a good logical explanation for why they would want those texts to disappear.
CGato
Because you don’t sound or write like someone who has done much research/homework.
Well put. Pride has a way of blinding far too effectively.
Now you are screaming that Q predicted on 4 Nov that Podesta would be indicted on 3 Nov. Acrually, Q’s prediction was for ‘tomorrow.’ If on 4 Nov Q predicted a Podesta indictment on ‘tomorrow,’ how would that relate to the actual prediction re 3 Nov?
Sometimes you sound more Christian than I.
Wasn't the trip to England canceled?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.