Liberal judges = cancerous tumors for this Republic.
Congress has an easy fix to this, but they won’t do their job.
Impeach and remove a few of the worse of these judges thereby creating more openings for the President to fill with honest judges.
Really? And the author is discovering this just now?
The judiciary is a bunch of political hacks in black muumuus operating under some vague theory of law. Yet people on our side, who presumably have a clue, seem to worship them like demigods. (((Facepalm)))
Politics is a scam and we’re suckers for playing.
Off with their heads!
Outstanding article.
There is no acceptable reason why we have hundreds of unelected little presidents running around able to overrule the one duly elected president. That is irrational, anti-constitutional, and anti-democratic.
The author’s excellent reasons why this could lead to a civil war are logical and possible
We all know what the founding fathers would do with them.
We are in desperate need of comprehensive judicial reform.
The current problem stems from the fact that there are no performance markers that hold judges accountable for their actions.
I would recommend a 3 strikes rule for judges. If your rulings are overturned at the appellate level 3 times then you are a bad judge and clearly have no understanding or no respect for the constitution.
If you sit at the appellate level and you are overturned 3 times by the Supreme Court the same applies.
Right now there are no bench marks for bad performance.
I understand why the author thinks the people can rise and compel congress to impeach/convict tyrannical judges.
Sorry, it ain’t gonna happen as long as senators are popularly elected.
Judicial tyranny, which will only get worse, is here to stay.
So far no one in authority whose authority has been impinged by these rogue rulings has told the lawless assholes to go get stuffed...
So, we have much more to fear than the occasional social justice decision from scotus.
Any one of the almost 700 federal district court judges can stop the President at any time.
This isn’t free-government. It is tyranny. Congress will do nothing.
A hundred years ago, before current civil service laws, judges could issue any ruling they wanted. But any executive branch employee who refused to carry out the President’s orders regardless would have been fired. This fact tended to limit judicial overreach.
What we need is to enable easier firing, AND reduce the number of jobs that require Senate confirmation.
Federal judges have been in rebellion for decades upon decades. Good that some are finally catching on.
Congress is responsible for the courts and judges.
Call said judge before the Judiciary committee in the House.
Proceed to impeachment and conviction.
It’s not precedent.
Right Alcee.
5.56mm
“The judges are declaring that Democracy exists in the U.S. only to the extent that viewpoints that judges consider acceptable can result from an election”
That’s been true since 1947. Where have you been?
It’s called Blackrobedterrorism (.com)
From the article; “ Gender theory is political fanaticism dispensed as psychobabble by the vast left-wing conspiracy. There are no genders, only two sexes, and it is not possible to change sex.”
I agree with this except for the words, “There are no genders...” There are in fact THREE genders, masculine, feminine and neuter but they apply only to PRONOUNS, not people. This is what used to be taught in schools back when people still believed that words have defined meanings. There can be no such thing as a transgender because you cannot do surgery on a pronoun. The term that was used in the seventies was tranSEXUAL. It first came to my attention that the word gender was being used incorrectly as if it meant the same thing as sex when the following song was recorded by Linda Rondstat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRV84iDlvkE