Posted on 12/15/2017 12:34:24 PM PST by jazusamo
Good point. Did they even tell the FISA court that the information had originated in oppo research commissioned by the Hillary campaign?
they would never be foolish enough to apply for a FISA with admitted oppo research. They would have claimed credit for obtaining the dossier through their own methods.
“I bet a Grand Jury would find out......................”
Normally, sending it to Grand Jury would be a wonderful thing. But in DC — full of minorities and liberals? I think they’d give all the traitors a pass in favor of Hillary and Obama.
If it should go to Grand Jury, would it have to be heard in DC? Are there ways around that to justify a change of venue? That would be the only way to get a fair result, I’d think.
“Brown Trout”
LOL! I haven’t heard that since I worked in the Water and Sewer Dept. in the ‘70s.
I don’t know.....................
Need to gather evidence to fill in blanks, of course, but there is no “insurance policy” to text about in summer 2016 unless there is ***something*** that the lovebirds thought could guarantee a Trump electoral defeat in Nov. 2016.
++++
My take as well. The Insurance Policy was intended to guarantee Hillary’s election. When that failed to happen the IP turned into a post-election project to discredit Trump and remove him from office.
Whatever needs to be done about it.
Inasmuch as this turns out to be true, President Trump must fully inform the American people and see to it that this crime does not go unpunished.
If anything even remotely resembling such a nefarious plot was attempted by President Obama, Hillary Clinton, their ilk, and elements within the government and the Deep State, there must be a reckoning.
The nation is quickly wading into armed revolution territory here—nothing less. Anyone involved in such a treasonous conspiracy needs to got to prison. We simply can't have arrogant Swamp creatures trying to subvert the American electoral processes, and if this is what was attempted, heads must roll—there must be full accountability for any and all guilty parties.
This is deadly serious stuff we're talking about here, and it can't just be "swept under the rug", overlooked, forgotten about, or dismissed as "water under the bridge". As Greg Jarrett pointed out, this is unprecedented in American history, and—once it's confirmed—the President must address the entire nation, issue a call to arms, and make an example out of those who have tried to betray the nation. The President must draw forth the full support, passion, and fury of the People.
This cannot be handled "gently"—it must be responded to forcefully and decisively—summoning all the indignation that's lurking within the patriotic elements of the citizenry.
There can be no middle ground here. It is past time to choose sides; anyone who is "on the fence" had better make up their mind pretty quickly, because all Hell is going to break loose if this subversive plot against the President—and the very Constitution—turns out to be true, which appears to be the case based on mounting evidence. Battle stations, everyone! This is no drill...
There
Aka
Roger
Over
What needs to be found out is if Strzok was on the distribution list, or had access to, the unmasked FISA recordings. A pretty decent case could be made that the unmasking and eaves-dropping on Trump advisors (and possibly Trump himself) was the insurance policy: They could listen into their conversations and get that information to Hillary to anticipate and counter Trump before his made public his strategies.
You don’t hire over a dozen pro-Clinton prosecutors in order to clear Trump.
“Did they even tell the FISA court that the information had originated in oppo research commissioned by the Hillary campaign? “
One better: Did the FBI tell the FISA judge that they had paid the informant to “verify” the information? I’m guessing there is a 100% chance that they didn’t because their is a 100% chance the judge would have denied the request had he known.
Trump must break them, or they will break him.
The gloves are off.
It may be TREASON, but it will not be treated as such. Drainage of the swamp will only be partial.
Are those related to wrinkled neck trout?
That's exactly how it appears to me.
Plus the bias by omission of not charging Mrs. Bill Clinton with her thousands of email crimes.
Sedition. This situation doesn’t meet the legal definition of treason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.