Posted on 12/04/2017 1:23:34 PM PST by abb
The Supreme Court is allowing President Donald Trump's latest travel ban on six Muslim-majority nations to go into effect. Two of the nine justices dissented
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
Tired of it yet? Hahaha.
{:0)
BOYCOTT THE NFL!!!....FOREVER!!!
BOYCOTT THE NFL PLAYOFFS!!!....FOREVER!!!
BOYCOTT THE SUPER BOWL!!!!....FOREVER!!!
I can’t hear you !!!!!!!!!!
.
Ah! But, you can read it! ;)
lol
Volume volume, pump up the volume!
SCOTUS doesn’t “allow”. The cconstitution, allows.
More winning, please. Thank you.
JoMa
“”Both are quite brilliant ladies
Shirley, you jest.””
and don’t call me Shirley!!
great movie - the naked gun-
LOL-LOL
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120417zr_4gd5.pdf
MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2017
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
17A550 TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL. V. HAWAII, ET AL.
The application for a stay presented to Justice Kennedy and by
him referred to the Court is granted, and the District Courts
October 20, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed
pending disposition of the Governments appeal in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the
Governments petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is
sought.
If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the
petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court
grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall
terminate when the Court enters its judgment.
In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited
basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision
with appropriate dispatch.
Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would deny the
application.
\o/ WIN!!!!!
This is F’n pathetic, isn’t it. A court “allows” the president to exercise his authority on immigration standards, who may or may not enter. In better days, this would have been taken care of publicly.
I don’t think it was ceding his authority. Whoever advised him not to thump that judge on the head made the right decision. With this, it told everybody against it that a judge cannot legally interfere in something he has no authority in in the first place.
You, me, every other FReeper, and everybody else knows that if Trump thumped the judge on the head and told him to go screw himself, that EVERYONE against it would then fervently believe they have some sort of legal case against the president, and a thousand more BS lawsuits would have been started up.
The cards were played right, even though it looked like defeat without putting up a fight. This is unfortunately what he has to do - walk a tightrope or risk an avalanche of lawsuits contesting his authority under the constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.