Posted on 11/15/2017 8:03:25 PM PST by doug from upland
FULL TITLE: BREAKING: Wolf Blitzer Repeatedly Asks Gloria Allred if the Yearbook Signature is a Forgery ALLRED REFUSES TO ANSWER! (VIDEO)
Embattled Attorney Gloria Allred, who is well known for trotting out women to confess to phony crimes against conservatives, held a press conference on Monday afternoon. Allred and her client accused Judge Roy Moore of attempted rape in 1977.
Allred and her client brought a yearbook with them to use as evidence during their press conference.
The signature was signed in two different colored inks.
Allred was a Hillary delegate at the DNC in 2016.
Allred is also under TWO INVESTIGATIONS for misconduct as an attorney.
On Wednesday Gloria Allred went on with Wolf Blitzer on CNN. Gloria Allred refused to say the high school yearbook signature was not a forgery.
Big League Politics has the transcript:
Well, all Im saying is, we will permit an independent examiner of the writing We will allow all of this to be asked and answered at the hearing, Allred said.
But thats not a flat denial, Gloria, Blitzer said.
Well, all Im saying is, were not denying, were not admitting, were not addressing, Allred said. We will not be distracted.
Blitzer asked why Allred needed a Senate hearing and would not just permit an independent handwriting expert to take a look.
Well, uh, all I can say is we want it done in a professional setting to the extent possible, thats the only setting in which people can testify under oath, Allred said.
I graduated HS in 1968. I was 12A in June 1968. The 12B class started in January and graduated in January. That is because there were so many baby boomers then that they could not fit them all in the 12 A class.
So, is she 12B?
I agree, the yearbook is a forgery...
“1. I doubt if a man who is coming on to a young woman would bother to write DA after his name in a affectionate entry in a yearbook...he would regard himself as a suitor not a city official...plus she knew who he was...shes not about to forget hes the DA..”
You idiot, pay attention, the “DA” after his name refers to his legal assistant, Deborah Adams, who would sign or rubber stamp the Judge’s signature , and then initial after, so as to indicate the law clerk put his signature on the document. Get up to speed!!!
Thanks for your additional clarification on post 66.
and you idiot take note that when I wrote that it had not yet been established that his assistant had the initials D.A.
keep up wont you ???
if you don’t have anything of substance to add but are here merely to abuse the FReepers don’t bother...
However the person who wrote that didn’t necessarily know the name of his assistant 40 years ago and was probably adding the DA for effect...to implicate Roy Moore..
The video at the link was gone. Here is another:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksyuJNew8Q0
Deborah Allen?
no, her name was Delbra Adams.
Yes!
Handwriting changes over the years. That is why a forensic expert must be allowed to evaluate the yearbook. Of course, Allred is not going to allow that. She will keep using it as an issue to erode Moore’s support right up to the election.
I don’t know if it is possible, but I’d like to see the GOP in Alabama file a motion for an emergency hearing and see a judge order Allred to turn over the yearbook for examination. Moore’s only hope at this point is to show that it is a fraud. If it is, the polls may very well turn and he might pull it out.
Gloria Allred!!!!
You just know when she is involved it is suspicious.
Folks, please, let’s lay off the insults. I know this is a very emotional topic. I am also very energized by this issue.
Of course, it’s suspicious. The yearbook may very well be a fraud. If she doesn’t allow it to be examined, our card has to be played. Call off the election.
Up to that point, Gloria was feeling really good about herself.
Wolf should be shamed for making a liberal feel “ungood” about herself......
This is a cardinal sin among liberals.
Folks, please, lets lay off the insults.
COBOL2Java to me: OK youre an idiot.
Weaklings dish out orders that they can't follow.
That is a forgery and she needs to be disbarred over it.
We suspect but don’t know it for sure. She is not going to allow it to be tested. After the Dem wins and it is proven to be a forgery, oh well. Anything to win.
Thank you...
This subject is more than just interesting to me...
Sex and the Senate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.