Posted on 11/15/2017 11:54:55 AM PST by C19fan
A startling and honestly distressing view is beginning to receive serious consideration in both academic and popular discussions of climate change ethics. According to this view, having a child is a major contributor to climate change. The logical takeaway here is that everyone on Earth ought to consider having fewer children.
Although culturally controversial, the scientific half of this position is fairly well-established. Several years ago, scientists showed that having a child, especially for the world’s wealthy, is one of the worst things you can do for the environment. That data was recycled this past summer in a paper showing that none of the activities most likely to reduce individuals’ carbon footprints are widely discussed.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
Amazing Comcast is willing to kill off its future subscriber base.
Science proves fake news outlets are bad for earth. It’s time we start eliminating them.
This is the dumbest article ever written.
hmmm...
not much different from the Albigensian Heresy in 1184.
Mankind is an evil creation.
Should not procreate.
Abortion is good.
Euthenasia via starvation is good.
Assisted suicide is good.
Homosexuality is good.
Vegetarianism is good.
OK, progressives and liberals and socialists, you have your marching orders — vasectomies and tubal ligation for you folks, for the good of Mother Earth.
Oh, how you’ll help save the world! Schedule your procedure today!
Scientists have done a lot more damage to the Earth than kids have. I suggest that we ban scientists..
Whites have basically stopped reproducing. Look at Europe and other “white” countries.
Notice how White Liberals are appointing themselves as the leaders of this white genocide/global suicide mission.
Dang, cherry.... just dang. :)
He really doesn’t mean that. He just wants WHITEY to stop having kids. All the others have a green light to pop out babies with their 4 wives, 3 slaves, and random White women that they rape.
I agree and yes I have noticed.
In no small part, this globalism thing is directed at precisely this problem.
In other words, NBC news is posting an opinion piece that is full of lies.
'Science' proves no such thing.
The short bio of author of this piece is: "Travis Rieder, Ph.D, is the Assistant Director for Education Initiatives, Director of the Master of Bioethics degree program and Research Scholar at the Berman Institute of Bioethics."
They should add the following to that:
Travis Rieder, Ph.D, is a gullible fool who lacks the critical thinking skills that would have prevented him from writing and publishing such a foolishly-wrong opinion piece.
You can be critical about the fact that we are in danger of losing our cultural heritage and values because of a influx of people who do not share historical Western ethics and have no desire to assimilate without referring to persons as though they are livestock.
Environmentalism is demonic. It seeks the eradication of Nature’s superior species.
So do I.
"Breeders" is a common term used by homos when referring to normal people. It reeks of envy and resentment.
I never imagined what global Islam would look like. But then I began thinking about it. It would be the fullest manifestation of the Devil. Mayhem, madness, and murder would be the highest achievement. Darkness, hatred, and ignorance would be universal. Slavery, beheadings, and female mutilation would be celebrated. After 1000 years all life on earth would cease to exist. Extinction would be guaranteed by the dominance of Islam.
I once asked my Daddy about global atomic warfare. e to me, “God will not let tat happen.”
God will not allow Islam to cover the earth.
NBC needs to do their part to save the Earth—mass suicide in the studio—lead by example!
Oh, I’m relieved. I thought maybe Pope Frankie had said this.
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.