Posted on 10/05/2017 2:28:41 PM PDT by libstripper
Two decades ago, the Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein invited Ashley Judd to the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel for what the young actress expected to be a business breakfast meeting. Instead, he had her sent up to his room, where he appeared in a bathrobe and asked if he could give her a massage or she could watch him shower, she recalled in an interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
“If he were in water I’d classify him as part of the grouper family.”
Post of the day.
Mixed feelings
He’s a lib slimeball and I don’t doubt he’s a creep to women. I’ll shed no tears for him personally.
But I don’t like see men ruined over decades old accusations, especially when one is by whackadoo Ashley Judd. Cry me a river for your casting couch regrets, ladies.
This is actually a big moment, a turning point, for Hollywood. They’ve been protecting the abuse of women and children for decades. Thanks to Bill Cosby, slowly we see the victims turn on the powerful pigs. I am very happy about this. May it continue and may people stop cowering and stand up to these schmucks. Who cares about career, money: if you have to play with the producer’s privates, it isn’t worth it.
No. No way. Disgusting.
The people behind the Democrats want Hillary to go away.
The Clinton Crime Family wants to take over. Incredibly, they want Chelsea to be somebody.
It’s too soon to attack Hillary directly. But it’s not too soon to start picking off their bootlickers to show the OTHER bootlickers which way the wind is blowing.
The NYT is off Team Clinton. That’s what this all means.
Agreed. But I love the “lib on lib” crap so much!
Ashley Judd is insane. Remember her “p*ssy hat day” tirade? She’s truly deranged.
He’s a fat oaf who generates no sympathy from me. Hollywood and New York City agents, directors and producers are often sexual predators - it comes with the territory of auditions and women wanting jobs.
He’s no victim.
I read your post in isolation on my ping list. Reading the entire thread it looks like I misinterpreted your remarks and you weren’t concerned about Weinstein. So sorry for my previous post.
Yes I’ve been an anti Harvey a long time
Hes as nasty as he looks
I’ve never liked her.
Rush thinks he going broke. Which is why it’s all coming out now. He has no power left to keep it quiet.
For that amount of money he is welcome to pound me in the back door area while chanting the seder and pouring Manischevitz wine on my head.
It is ALWAYS enjoyable and extremely entertaining to watch them bash each and try to out-victim themselves.
Wherever and whenever possible, we should encourage them...
Not even sure who this Weinstein guy is. He looks like a complete leftist douchebag.
But hey, if he was their Golden Boy yesterday, and today he’s pissing in their ice cream, then that’s fine with me.
He looks like a sleaze ball.
I would not want to be in the presence of a leach like that.
Just another reason to be glad I am a nobody in the eyes of the world.
Who needs what the world has to offer when it’s THAT sort of thing.
“Why the Harvey Weinstein Story Is Worse Than You Think”:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-human-...le/2009995
“Bill Clinton offered get-out-of-jail-free cards to a whole army of sleazeballs, from Jeffrey Epstein to Harvey Weinstein to the foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative. The deal was simple: Pay up, genuflect, and get on with your existence. It was like a papacy selling indulgences, at the same time that everyone knew that the cardinals were up to no good. The 2016 election demolished Clinton world once and for all, to be replaced by the cult of Obama, an austere sect designated by their tailored hair shirts with Nehru collars. “That is not who we are as Americans,” they chant, as Harvey Weinstein’s ashes are scattered in the wind.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.