Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada criminalizes non-progressive thought
American Thinker ^ | June 17, 2017 | Daren Jonescu

Posted on 06/17/2017 4:37:54 AM PDT by NYer

Do you think imposing so-called transgenderism on children as a sexual norm might be harmful to their moral development? Do you question the legitimacy of using made up so-called gender-neutral pronouns as replacements for the standard English words "he" and "she"?

If you answered yes, or even maybe, to either of those questions, then, as of today, you are in violation of Canada's Human Rights Code, and subject to fines, re-education, or – should you refuse comply and repent – prison time.

Canada's Senate has passed a "controversial" (read: fascistic) new law, Bill C-16, which adds "gender identity" and "gender expression" to the nation's hate crime laws – Canada being a world leader in legislating who should be hated and who shouldn't – thus effectively making it a crime for a business owner to "discriminate" on the basis of not wanting his male employee to wear a dress, or for a teacher not to use a nonexistent, politically correct pronoun whenever a student tells her to. More generally, it makes a hate criminal of anyone who openly expresses a view not perfectly compliant with the zeitgeist on gender identity, transgenderism, or what have you. The debate is now, officially and legally, over.

SNIP

In other words, a postmodern, nihilistic, neo-Marxist pseudo-theory of sexual identity and systemic oppression, dreamt up by some pretentious careerist professor of "queer studies" climbing out of the academic slime somewhere five years ago, has officially been declared the unassailable Absolute Truth by Justin Trudeau's government. Unassailable as in "alternative views will not be given a hearing." Unassailable as in "heretics will be burned."

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: canada; homosexualagenda; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: NYer

Haha. What pathetic idiots. So (among other idiocies) it is criminal to say that abusing your child through transexual transformation is child abuse? What fascist fools.


21 posted on 06/17/2017 5:43:44 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
It’s the beginning of the end of free thought, as such thought becomes a crime.

Not while we still have the freedom to act. Boycott their products.

22 posted on 06/17/2017 5:46:15 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Prayers for our country and President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Canadian children will make great Eloi.


23 posted on 06/17/2017 5:53:01 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rephope

I’ve been hoping that Trump et al. would reverse this insanity, which was thrust on the military as one of Obama’s parting shots.

All Army personnel, civilian and military, are required to take “transgender” training by the end of the month.

“Transgender” or not, there is no way I’m going to use the gym if men are using the women’s locker room. I change clothes at the gym; sometimes I shower there. I do *not* want a man in my locker room.

I imagine that sexual predators will be the first to take advantage of the “transgender” policies. The reality is that cross-dressing is a sexual fetish; why *any* sexual fetish should be awarded the status of a civil right, especially in the military, is beyond me.


24 posted on 06/17/2017 6:21:08 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

They are indeed becoming more ridiculous that your average Mondy Python comedy skit.


25 posted on 06/17/2017 6:35:36 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Now for the Lumber Jack song...


26 posted on 06/17/2017 6:51:29 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NYer

We’ll have to see how fast they go after the church now.


27 posted on 06/17/2017 6:53:03 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It is criminalized here through bureaucracies like each state’s Human Rights Commission.


28 posted on 06/17/2017 7:14:50 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Went to a wedding in Ottawa in 2012. At night the streets in from of Parliament were chock full of “Je me souviens” plated cars, like an invasion. The Muslim quarter (drove into it by accident) was like the worst of Marrakesh.

My first trip to Canada and probably my last.


29 posted on 06/17/2017 7:16:28 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Exactly. So called ‘civil rights’ is largely used in this manner. Whose civil rights? Do we all equally have these civil rights?


30 posted on 06/17/2017 7:20:32 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s not all bad news, some Canadians want to push back on this, and it has happened before that Orwellian law passed by a Liberal government was then later repealed by a Conservative government. The Conservative Party at this point has just come out of a leadership campaign and it will be a few months before this matter gets in front of a policy convention, but I expect it will become a party platform to repeal or at least tone down some of the language in the legislation. As things stand now, it is still generally safe legally to make your criticism of gender identity politics either religious or philosophical. As in your own country there is a legal climate that has shifted far to the left but actual enforcement of these laws is relatively confined to a few test cases (I was involved in one or two myself), and the pattern of judicial results is rather mixed.

From my perspective, it’s not valid to suggest that Canada would be some sort of threat to American values on matters of gender identity politics, the main push for all of this seems to be originating in American university campuses and the entertainment industry. The most important fact to keep in mind about globalism is that its most active supporters live in the U.S.A. and operate in plain sight with the backing of one of the two political parties and considerable support from the other main party.

The real truth of the matter is that we are all facing the same thought police in one form or another.


31 posted on 06/17/2017 7:30:55 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (The president is a good man -- that's why they are out to get him -- where have we seen this before?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NYer

There is no free speech (and therefore free thought) in Canada.

I have had many Canadians tell me they have free speech rights but they do not.


32 posted on 06/17/2017 7:59:34 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

It is relative.
Relatively speaking we have the most free speech compared to other countries in the world ... as long as we can keep it.


33 posted on 06/17/2017 8:01:58 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It baffles me how they come up with this stuff. Most every other European language uses gender declensions including German. Which English doesn’t do, including the impersonal pronoun ,thee, and thou, which it dropped. So are supposed to adapt these silly rules to these other languages ?


34 posted on 06/17/2017 8:48:32 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (national)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bfl


35 posted on 06/17/2017 8:50:51 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

OOpps sorry about that 1st posting
It baffles me how they come up with this stuff. Most every other European language uses gender declensions including German. Which English doesn’t do, including the impersonal pronoun ,thee, and thou, which it dropped. So are Canadians supposed to adapt these silly rules to these other languages which includes French ?


36 posted on 06/17/2017 8:55:02 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (national)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
So are Canadians supposed to adapt these silly rules to these other languages which includes French ?<>

. You're right in french each noun is either masculine or feminine and unlike english the definitive articles " A " and "The" denotes masculine or feminine, presumably they will have to change to gender neutral definitive articles, may I suggest "Li" for "The".

37 posted on 06/17/2017 10:10:08 AM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson