Posted on 05/26/2017 12:03:19 PM PDT by Twotone
If you live within the reddish or pinkish shaded areas of the corridor shown on the accompanying map … you just might be among the first to feel the bite of the United Nations’ pipedream known as Agenda 21. What this map shows is one Agenda 21 installment of The Wildlands Network, known as the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative.
This is a collaborative effort of more than a hundred environmental groups, organizations and related agencies. One of those “radical” agencies just happens to be MT Fish, Wildlife and Parks which is listed as a collaborating partner of this plan to force residents off the land in order to establish a 2,000 mile long “wilderness corridor” running from the Greater Yellowstone Area all the way to the Yukon. A few years back, irate Montana sportsmen forced the agency to withdraw its name from the list but it is now back on that list. And so is the University of Montana, who’s Dr. Robert Ream lied about the native Northern Rockies wolf “no longer existing”.
Did you know that until just a couple of years ago, Bob Ream also headed the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission and steered Montana’s fish and game agency away from adequate wolf control and to hide real wolf numbers and hide the true damage wolves were inflicting on big game populations. It should be clear to everyone that MT FWP and the University of Montana have been and continue to be willing partners in this wildlife disaster.
(Excerpt) Read more at bowhunting.net ...
Send them to the border.
Damage Wolves would be an awesome name for a band.
They're also vicious predators that spread parasites and damage agriculture and cattle/sheep stock.
The balance can't be towards letting these animals run wild over people trying to make a living, simply because people who never have to deal with them think they're nice to look at when they flip on Nat Geo.
If Africans were to eradicate all of their large predators I’ll bet Toby Bridges would be upset by that. I am pulling for the wolves.
The clause shown above is the only constitutional authorization and outline for how the feds can own and/or interfere with state lands (basically limited to buildings used in military defense of the U.S. after purchase form the state with state permission). Federal sanctioning of Agenda 21 installment of The Wildlands Network, known as the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative is entirely unconstitutional.
We need to wake up to the fact that our #1 political priority is to reinstate the Constitution as the supreme law of the land over the feds.
Either We the People enforce our constitutional rights upon the feds or the feds will enforce their tyranny upon us. There is no third option.
Feed the libtards to the wolves. Hamstring one and dump him or her near a pack in the dead of winter. I bet the Youtube video would get a million hits.
In what way does that unconstitutionality extend into Canada?
I think we need to just air drop a bunch of these advocates in the wild in wolf country without food or water or weapons and see if they smile and admire the wolves up close in person.
See if their position on dealing with the wolf populations change.
They recently killed a wolf IN the Helena Valley in Montana.
Not near the valley or in the mountains above the valley.
IN the valley.
Where all the children are.
I agree with you about predation, disease, etc.
Most bitter to me is that the transplanted wolves have knocked down the Northern Yellowstone elk heard from some twenty thousand to closer to two thousand.
Imagine if a rancher, logger or oil company committed that kind of carnage.
And yet these numbers are celebrated, because the activists believe that when all the wild game is gone, these murderous beasts will drive the cattle ranchers off the land.
Specifically:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
http://www.yellowstonepark.com/wolf-reintroduction-changes-ecosystem/
Yeah, but the wolves are a benefit. (I think it’s horse hockey)
Obviously this applies to U.S. land beginning at the U.S.-Canada border.
Wolves were reintroduced in the West to advance gun control.
The Liberals have absolutely no counter-argument to the argument that hunting the ungulates (deer, elk, moose) is much more humane than letting them starve or fall from mass illness.
Rifles are necessary for hunting.
So, the Liberals were always going to lose the gun control argument. They didn’t want to show up as being in humane next to hunters.
What could they do?
They want to rule with an iron hand over everyone in this country and that means they HAVE to get rid of rifles.
They have to get rid of the ungulates.
They are using wolves to do that.
Take a baby moose to a university and set it loose with a pack of wolves. See how much they really love those wolves after they eat the baby moose alive.
Wolves = gun control
Since the introduction of wolves into Yellowstone park in 1998, their 17,000 elk herd is now down to approx. 4,900. Here's an interesting statement from a National Park Biologist:
"In a way it’s good news,” said Doug Smith, a Yellowstone National Park biologist. “We think we have a fairly stable elk herd.”
Quite; but my observation is also vacuously true.
In the decade following its publication, Park scientists attacked the book, one contention of which was that the elk population had pretty much entirely destroyed the Yellowstone and surrounding ecosystem. Now they freely admit that the elk herd was far too large, and drove a large number of both plant and animal species to extinction in the area.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.