Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategy
M16? Yah,OK.Field artillery? Maybe not!

One of my favorite lines from Good Morning,Vietnam..."what's the difference between the Army and the Cub Scouts? The Cub Scouts don't have heavy artillery."

4 posted on 05/03/2017 3:57:08 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Read the constitution sometime, Letters of Marquis were for private war ships. The most powerful weapons we had at first. The reason we have to reauthorize the army every 2 years is because we were not supposed to have a regular standing army. It was supposed to be a call up of the militias with arms already present.


11 posted on 05/03/2017 4:23:04 AM PDT by Mechanicos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

Owning artillery was legal once upon a time, and citizenry did indeed own cannon once.


18 posted on 05/03/2017 4:58:15 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
M16? Yah,OK.Field artillery? Maybe not!

Why not?

Cannons used to be privately owned and no one thought a thing of it.

21 posted on 05/03/2017 5:10:41 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

Yes, I’ll have that Bull designed Iraqi 155mm Al-Majnoonan gun over there in the corner, 500 M795s, 510 of the ATK PGK fuzes and 2 programing stations.

:-)


27 posted on 05/03/2017 5:37:40 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

The confiscation of privately owned artillery was the goal of the Redcoats raid on Concord that set off our freedom fighters.


28 posted on 05/03/2017 5:43:53 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

This guy will give Maura Healey the vapors!


30 posted on 05/03/2017 5:51:29 AM PDT by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
"M16? Yah,OK.Field artillery? Maybe not!"

It is legal to privately own cannons and field artillery. Here is a quick search on youtube. The Knob Creek and Big Sandy Shoots are citizen owned.

MASH HERE
37 posted on 05/03/2017 6:43:55 AM PDT by DocRock (And now is the time to fight! Peter Muhlenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
M16? Yah,OK.Field artillery? Maybe not!

Light recoilless rifles and mortars, however, maybe so.

They're a helpful reminder to cops in surplus armored vehicles that they have no lawful authority to perform house-to-house searches for firearms, or cash, or jewelry, or anything else without a legal warrant, just because they can.

And it's also worth remembering that Henry Knox, the Revolutionary War hero and father of the American Artillery Corps, was a civilian artillery hobbyist. Fun hobby!

Me, I'm a Tanker. Not an ex-tanker, not a former tanker, I'll be a treadhead until the day I die. We work in four-man teams called crews, and I know three other tankers similarly inclined. And yep, we're http://www.armyjeeps.net/armor1.htmin the market for a new ride. With a cannon on it.

40 posted on 05/03/2017 7:18:52 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
***Field artillery? Maybe not!***

Why not? Citizens used to could buy them!

Then the Washington Post went livid!


49 posted on 05/03/2017 8:28:34 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (That's my story and I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
If you have a place to put one, and enough yard or range to stretch from it's location to the impact zone, and everything in between, then why not?

Is it a matter of trust?

Is it a matter of size?

Is having military arms for the citizenry confined to small calibers?

Does infringement have a threshold?

52 posted on 05/03/2017 8:33:35 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative

Up until the 1968 GCA, a citizen could own field artillery without any government oversight. After that, every artillery piece and every projectile has to be registered with the government as a destructive device, but they are still in private hands.


63 posted on 05/03/2017 1:48:26 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson