Kristin Gunckel is actually a "she."
Posted on 04/27/2017 2:27:10 AM PDT by detective
A professor at the University of Arizona who conducts research on science education is arguing that students should be taught “queer theory” in elementary school.
Kristin Gunckel, a professor at the University of Arizona, argued on behalf of introducing “queer theory” into American elementary school curriculum in a recent lecture that took place last month.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
AH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
John Belushi to the pick up aisle
It looks mean
Part of the homosexual movement is NAMBLA a filthy group of low life scum who desire sex with children under 8 years old, mostly boys. In fact their motto is “After eight is too late”.
Your on Satan’s turf in *any* government school.
It’s Androgynous Pat!
Teach them while they are young.
It worked with Barack Obama.
I agree with the introduction of queer theory as a threat to public health and the safety of children based on the fact that said sex offenders are perpetrators of an inordinate level of sexual abuse and rape of young children. The Hollywood version is fantasy.
What is it with the liberal obsession with perverted sex?
They truly are mentally ill.
Kristin Gunckel is actually a "she."
She looks like a lesbian.
It was once listed under ‘paraphilias’, which is the unnatural sexual attraction to abnormal things.
Someone of your own sex, animals, kids, feet, fruit, dead things...
The first domino fell in 1974 and the rest will follow.
Sodom and Gomorrah is their vision of Utopia.
Professional predators is what they are.
THIS is why we home school. Math theory is of far greater concern.
One queer theory being bandied about is “the only good queer is a dead queer”
Of course many consider that attitude a bit harsh and modify it to say “the only good queer is a closeted queer”
The latter seems to be the policy of human society for most of it’s exixtence
I can see why civilizations in the past had a “way” of dealing with these people that was widely accepted.
I think you’re on the right track with homeschooling. -
I wish we’d have homeschooled our son. He has had a lot
of struggles that he might have been spared if we had
homeschooled. - His grandfather was Chairman of the Board
of Education in the little town where they lived; and he
would have had a cow if we’d bucked the “system”. My
husband dared not buck his daddy. :o(
“THIS is why we home school. Math theory is of far greater concern.”
Same here.
assistant professor...by why quibble
Perv eyes.
The basis of sexual relations begins with reproduction, as it employs the physical means by which reproduction occurs.
That over time, it has served the purpose of bonding the couple is true as well.
But in as much as two men cannot go together off into the woods and return ten months later with a newborn child they created together, and neither can two women, then yes the “norm”, the most usual, most useful, most natural (as in fitting the natural purpose) is not a “social construct” but what in fact the majority of people recognize as “normal”.
“Queer theory” is another way, in the latest “sexuality” agenda that the “gay” community, if they are smart, would disown. Why? It goes along with other new “trans” theory offerings which attempt to suggest both “gender identity” and “gender attraction” CAN BE CHOSEN, which flies in the face of the legal arguments that “gays” are “born that way” and that - that they are born that way - is where from “gay rights” such as same-sex marriage is deserved.
Theory, huh. So, he admits it is conjecture and not real.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.