Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Markey Claims Democrats Will Restore 60-Vote Threshold for Supreme Court Nominees
The Washington Free Beacon ^ | April 10, 2017 | Cameron Cawthorne

Posted on 04/10/2017 4:33:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

Markey Claims That Dems will Restore Filibuster for Supreme Court Nominees

Sen. Ed Markey (D., Mass.) claimed Monday that Democrats will restore the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees once his party retakes the majority in the Senate.

"When the Democrats return to the majority and capture the presidency, which we will," Markey said, "that day is going to arrive [and] we will restore the 60-vote margin."

"We will ensure that for the Supreme Court, there is that special margin that any candidate has to reach because that is essential to ensuring that our country has a confidence in those people who are nominated," Markey added. "Rather than just someone who passes a litmus test."

MSNBC host Katy Tur asked Markey earlier in the interview whether he and Democrats had regrets about opposing President Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, who was sworn in on Monday. Democrats mounted the votes to filibuster Gorsuch, a rarity for Supreme Court picks.

Markey castigated Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and Senate Republicans for invoking the so-called "nuclear option" by lowering the cloture threshold from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51. He called their move "unprecedented" and said that they "destroyed" the Supreme Court nomination process.

The Senate then confirmed Gorsuch last Friday with a 54-45 vote in favor of his nomination, and he was officially sworn in on Monday.

This tactic was used by Senate Republicans to overcome the filibuster effort by Democrats, but it was initiated by former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev) and Senate Democrats in 2013 when they controlled the chamber, the Washington Free Beacon reported:

Senate Democrats first employed the nuclear option back in 2013 to advance former President Obama's judicial nominations, although the Supreme Court was not included in the rule change. The move was used to circumvent Republican efforts to filibuster some of Obama's nominees

Three and a half years later, Democrats have threatened to filibuster the nomination of Gorsuch, President Trump's pick for the nation's highest court. The Senate's 52 Republicans threatened to use the nuclear option to break the filibuster and did so on Thursday.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: democrats; dingyharryreeid; edmarkey; neilgorsuch; presidenttrump; scotus; senate; senatedemonrats; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Kaslin

Markey Claims Democrats Will Restore 60-Vote Threshold for Supreme Court Nominees

If this moron truly believes this, then he is a bigger asshole than previously thought.


61 posted on 04/10/2017 6:18:38 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The “good news” is that Ed Malarkey will be long in his grave when the RATs get the opportunity, if they ever do. I expect that in President Trump’s first term, he will get at least two more SCOTUS justices, and possibly three. And he needs to make sure that all three of them are 49 years old, just like Justice Gorsuch. We will then have a “strict constructionist” SCOTUS for the next 20 years at the minimum.

1. Ruth Buzzy will either quit, or more likely just die.
2. Anthony Kennedy will announce his retirement later this year.
3. Stephen Breyer ? but he’s 81 so he may follow the Buzzy route.


62 posted on 04/10/2017 6:18:45 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Whether they retake the majority will depend on the success (or lack therof) of VP Pence’s Special Commission.

I haven’t heard one update on their progress, if there is any, being made.

If they don’t clean it up, and I mean REALLY clean it up, we will indeed lose to their fraud.


63 posted on 04/10/2017 6:19:20 PM PDT by Kalamata (Bannon/Miller 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

“Markey is known as one of the least intelligent members of the Senate...”

You’re leaving out Susan ( I’m in my tennies) Murray of WA. When you are considering dumb and dumber, she’s dumbest! Stabenow fills the “dumber” slot!


64 posted on 04/10/2017 6:22:15 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack

Markey is known as one of the least intelligent members of the Senate...

Right down there with Tim Kain.


65 posted on 04/10/2017 6:22:23 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Markey is an absolute moron who received 13% of the vote to become Senator in Massachusetts initially.

He is of course dumb enough to actually enunciate this complete lying BS for the democrats.

66 posted on 04/10/2017 6:23:42 PM PDT by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All

Markey? Malarkey!


67 posted on 04/10/2017 6:25:07 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

“...this is such an obvious fairy tale...”

Never underestimate scu&bags.

IMHO


68 posted on 04/10/2017 6:26:43 PM PDT by ripley (ually to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah right. Yes, if the Dems gain control of the Senate in 2018, they could restore the threshold to 60 votes for a SCOTUS nominee to stop a Rep President. However, if a Dem gets in the WH and they retain control of the Senate, they will resort to the nuclear option as they did before.


69 posted on 04/10/2017 6:27:27 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

That’s what I think also...And pretty young at that...


70 posted on 04/10/2017 6:35:39 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Best idea: don’t let Dem-wits back in power. Ever


71 posted on 04/10/2017 6:37:23 PM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Um, what is this guy saying? As soon as we re-gain the majority we’ll restore rights to the minority?

I suppose I might believe that about some political party somewhere in the Universe, but about the Dem Party of the USA of Earth, no, I don’t believe it for a second.


72 posted on 04/10/2017 6:41:12 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My ass they will. These despicable sobs were the first to launch filibusters against court appointees in the first place. They won’t reinstate it without a 60 40 margin in the senate and that ain’t happening any time soon


73 posted on 04/10/2017 7:00:18 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does it matter? Republicans rolled over and allowed liberal lawmaking Constitution revisionists Sotomayor and Kagan to be confirmed.


74 posted on 04/10/2017 7:14:24 PM PDT by Rainier1789 (My Constitution has a 2nd and 10th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

YES! Keep doing the same thing that you did during the LAST Election, and two decades BEFORE THAT, and you will succeed he he


75 posted on 04/10/2017 7:17:06 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (------>VMFA 235- '69-'72 KMCAS <------- "Death Angels")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Sen. Ed Markey (D., Mass.) claimed Monday that Democrats will restore the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees once his party retakes the majority in the Senate.

But they ain't there yet!!!

76 posted on 04/10/2017 7:19:01 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

How funding things in America gets done...


77 posted on 04/10/2017 7:20:31 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998

Ed; what do wannabe when you grow up?


78 posted on 04/10/2017 7:21:59 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Malarkey.


79 posted on 04/10/2017 7:23:18 PM PDT by matt1234 (Jan. 20, 2017: the national nightmare ended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Democrats 60 votes

Republicans 54 or 51 votes

Supreme Court AND Legislation

Sounds fair.


80 posted on 04/10/2017 7:35:04 PM PDT by TheNext (Individual Mandate NO V.S. Individual Health Savings account HSA - YES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson