Posted on 03/14/2017 4:48:36 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
Breaking on Drudge, from Rachel Madcow's twitter feed.
She claims to have Trump's Tax Returns.
If it’s the 1040 for 2005, it might just be tied to an investigation by Preet Bharara? It’s decidedly weird to have it go back that far unless there are “problems”.
I will try to stomach it. Blech!
Hmnn.... $38MM is a LITTLE MORE than I paid in 2005.
Trump probably paid no income tax due to large real estate losses. All according to the law.
The MSNBC report is going to reveal starting information about Donald Trump that Americans never knew before ...
Like -- Donald Trump is a billionaire.
We now return to our regularly scheduled program.
Violation of Federal requiring termination and imprisonment unless Trump provided them.
If they were obtained illegally President Trump will have a free hand to dismantle the IRS.
Pot them so Trump could sue your sorry azz off.
I’ll bet Ronald Maddow (or whatever it’s name is) hasn’t been this excited since it showed us jug-ears’ bc, passport(s), transcripts, etc.
2005
I would HIT the blonde.
Wait! Are they still on the air? ;)
Stop the presses we got a scoop! /sarc. About as earth shattering as Hore-aldo opening Al Capone’s safe.
Yes, you are correct. It is a phony question arising out of years of government over-reach.
There is actually no such thing as "THE PRESS" in the sense that term is used by elitist Progressives today (including those on the juducial bench) — some sort of elite group whose members are allowed preferential treatment under law.
In the Constitutional sense, “the press” is a technological device for disseminating information. One cannot be a “member” of the press. One can only have access to a press.
Any device which enables one to state and publicize one’s views is a “press,” whether it be moveable type, offset, TV, radio, or the Internet. We all have free access to “the press,” meaning we have the right to pay any provider who wishes to sell us access to publicize our ideas.
In this regard, no CBS anchor has anymore claim to special treatment for being part of “the press” than does any blogger.
“Freedom of the press” applies equally to every citizen seeking to use a technological device to record and publicize his or her opinion.
2005? LMAOOOO
Thanks for finding this, signalman!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3534732/posts?page=204#204
Tim,
Above law includes not only the leaker, but anyone who publishes it.
Felony.
3 page from 2005
What if it was a joint filing and his ex-wife had given it to someone?
Heh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.