Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2017 10:41:02 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Red Badger

Thank the Clinton Crime Family for selling high tech know-how to the ChiComs back in the 90s.


2 posted on 03/02/2017 10:43:53 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Just what the world needs.


3 posted on 03/02/2017 10:43:55 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

4 posted on 03/02/2017 10:44:53 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It would seem to me that any reasonable amount of battlefield dust or smoke would diffuse any sort of laser to the point where it wouldn’t be effective at all. I’m sure that someone else could speak more authoritatively to this than I, but it just seems that the scatter would cause it to fail ...


6 posted on 03/02/2017 10:46:32 AM PST by BlueLancer (Ex Scientia Tridens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Either this laser technology evolves as an effective anti missile weapon or all capital surface ships are outmoded.


7 posted on 03/02/2017 10:46:42 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

if it’s chinese, why are its markings in english?


13 posted on 03/02/2017 10:51:16 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Keeping it simple for the chi-coms. in theater use of a laser, far more powerful— from the US side— would come from space, and be more powerful in multiples of 10 to the 3rd power, and no atmosphere to get in the way until the last 4 miles or so— seriously destructive. But wouldn’t expect to see it at a weapons sales expo for mooches from the chinee.

LOL. Wuuuu, wuuuu!!!


16 posted on 03/02/2017 10:54:06 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Why does the Chinese weapon system have English on the side?


17 posted on 03/02/2017 10:54:51 AM PST by BillT (If you can not stand behind our military, you might as well stand in front of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

On the good side, it won’t work in six months...


18 posted on 03/02/2017 10:56:02 AM PST by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

There were reports of us having something like this during the Panama invasion.


22 posted on 03/02/2017 10:58:04 AM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

LOL we can just place active mirror tech on our tanks and bounce it off or reflect it back at them.


23 posted on 03/02/2017 10:58:24 AM PST by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Coming soon to a Harbor Freight near you. It’ll be in the barbeque grill aisle.


24 posted on 03/02/2017 10:59:06 AM PST by Sasparilla ( I'm Not tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Specular reflection may be a defense and can potentially turn the weapon against itself.


28 posted on 03/02/2017 11:01:50 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the War on White People, is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

What’s the power source of the mobile version?


29 posted on 03/02/2017 11:01:55 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The A-10 Warthog made tanks and this toy obsolete decades ago.


36 posted on 03/02/2017 11:10:47 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Love your neighbor as you love yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Kim Jong Un has been wanting one of these for getting rid of his officers without using mortar rounds or anti-aircraft guns.


38 posted on 03/02/2017 11:12:10 AM PST by Two Kids' Dad (((( More and More Winning! ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
This could have been useful as a "enhanced interrogation" device....



41 posted on 03/02/2017 11:20:18 AM PST by ObozoMustGo2012 ("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We just need to make something bigger, badder, faster, and more lethal. And while we’re at it, clamp down on sensitive technology transfers to china through scholastic espionage, and root out spies at our national labs.


45 posted on 03/02/2017 11:28:06 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Just one more step towards the opening scenes of the first Terminator film.


47 posted on 03/02/2017 11:37:34 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I’m sure someone else has already thought of this, but how about shooting out a cloud of miniature corner cube retroreflectors when a laser strike is detected? Unless the laser pulse is very short, the beam will be reflected BACK where it came from, albeit much distorted.


49 posted on 03/02/2017 11:45:03 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson