Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit will be voting on whether to reconsider the 3-judge panel decision en banc.
Chris Geidner Twitter ^ | February 10, 2017 | Chris Gender

Posted on 02/12/2017 5:52:47 AM PST by saywhatagain

THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator:

A judge on this court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be take as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017, should be reconsidered en banc.

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; middleeast; somalia; syria; travelban; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Must go to link to see the actual court filing. Cae No. 17-35105.

A copy was made a tweeted by Chris Geidner. Chris is the legal editor at BuzzFeedNews. He goes on to tweet This means that the entire appeals court will be voting on whether to reconsider Thursday night's decision. Briefs due by 11a PT Feb. 16

Of course can not find any Fakenews organization sharing this information

1 posted on 02/12/2017 5:52:47 AM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Means the 9th Circus is having an “oh s—t” moment?


2 posted on 02/12/2017 5:55:12 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (STOP THE TAPE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Why? Did one of them find a copy of the US Code lying around and decide to read it?


3 posted on 02/12/2017 5:55:18 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (SandyInPeoria just doesn't sound right... yet here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Why does this Circus of a Court get to decide if THEY get to reconsider this? Wouldn’t it be up to the parties concerned?


4 posted on 02/12/2017 5:56:22 AM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Hopefully, Congress will be voting to dismantle the Ninth Circuit Court. It is too big, too biased, and with only a 15% success rate in SCOTUS appeals, too ineffective to carry on in its present form.


5 posted on 02/12/2017 5:56:28 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Do over?


6 posted on 02/12/2017 5:56:51 AM PST by cp124 (America Survives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
I believed then and believe now, that when the decision came down against President Trump and the American people . . . It was a victory because . . .

This moment allows President Trump and others an opportunity to illustrate clearly the corruption and perverted ideaology of the Democrats and those of sitting on the judicial bench.

The rights and protection of the American people vs seven terrorism-plagued countries.

Oh gee thats like kinda of a no-brainer. As President Trump has remarked . . . even a eighth grader can figure this one out.

7 posted on 02/12/2017 5:57:06 AM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Once the 9th puts the political, lawless decision aside, THOSE THREE JUDGES MUST BE IMMEDIATELY IMPEACHED.

Enough is enough.


8 posted on 02/12/2017 5:57:11 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
who filed a appeal?

These idiots must know they can"t appeal their own decision

9 posted on 02/12/2017 5:59:35 AM PST by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Means the 9th Circus is having an “oh s—t” moment?

Thats exactly what I am thinking. And if so . . . Am truly enjoying this moment.

10 posted on 02/12/2017 5:59:39 AM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Not exactly an appeal. The one sane judge on the panel realized these three stepped in it and they want to take a closer look to try and salvage their reputation (too late.)

I’ve never heard of it being done before, but perhaps I just haven’t been paying attention.


11 posted on 02/12/2017 6:01:13 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (SandyInPeoria just doesn't sound right... yet here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

They are ALL treasonous blackrobed clowns
eager for money from foreign governments like
the first meddler from the 9th circuit.

Original jurisdiction this is, and only the USSC
can hear the case.


12 posted on 02/12/2017 6:01:16 AM PST by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I wonder... they could be trying to become reasonable and choosing to follow the law and established precedent... or they could be doubling down on sedition.

Who knows.

My guess is the sedition route.


13 posted on 02/12/2017 6:01:20 AM PST by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
"These idiots must know they can"t appeal their own decision"

Apparently they can. The first line in the court filing is very clear, saying . . .

"A judge on this court has made a sua sponte request that a vote be take as to whether the order issued by the three judge motions panel on February 9, 2017"

14 posted on 02/12/2017 6:02:45 AM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
Screw you 9th Circuit.

Trump will fix your wagon on Monday.

15 posted on 02/12/2017 6:03:05 AM PST by mware (RETIRED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I think that was the real threat that prompted this action.

Impeachment was real and almost a guaranteed done deal.

They'd better do something about their activism.

16 posted on 02/12/2017 6:03:14 AM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

I think that this ruling, clearly outside of the law based on what I’ve read and heard, should be grounds for impeachment. If not, Congress should take steps to remedy this situation. To allow these Mavericks to continue to impose their will rather than the law is a waste of time and money . Their record of being overturned demonstrates their poor judgment. In addition, their recent ruling has the potential to harm citizens on a nationwide basis. Why should West Coast Progressives be allowed to inhibit nationwide security just because West Coast tech firms want an open door for cheap skilled labor?


17 posted on 02/12/2017 6:04:19 AM PST by Boomer One ( ToUsesn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It may mean “The ruling wasn’t anti-Trump enough, let’s grant unlimited constitutional rights and entitlements to everyone on earth.”


18 posted on 02/12/2017 6:04:29 AM PST by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Counting our chickens before they’ve hatched?

There’s no guarantee at all that the decision will be set aside by a larger panel of judges. They are still selected from the same circuit and are thus probably inclined to keep the decision of their cohorts. This is just the quickest route with the highest probability (relatively speaking) left for Trump.

Otherwise he’d have to wait for a SC decision which could take months. Which then kind of defeats the purpose of a “90 day ban”.

Let us all pray for a successful outcome. This could be a harmful loss for the President so early in his administration.


19 posted on 02/12/2017 6:05:29 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Impeachment is not a possible reality.

A different solution is required to rid the country of such vermin


20 posted on 02/12/2017 6:05:44 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson