A copy was made a tweeted by Chris Geidner. Chris is the legal editor at BuzzFeedNews. He goes on to tweet This means that the entire appeals court will be voting on whether to reconsider Thursday night's decision. Briefs due by 11a PT Feb. 16
Of course can not find any Fakenews organization sharing this information
Means the 9th Circus is having an “oh s—t” moment?
Why? Did one of them find a copy of the US Code lying around and decide to read it?
Why does this Circus of a Court get to decide if THEY get to reconsider this? Wouldn’t it be up to the parties concerned?
Hopefully, Congress will be voting to dismantle the Ninth Circuit Court. It is too big, too biased, and with only a 15% success rate in SCOTUS appeals, too ineffective to carry on in its present form.
Do over?
This moment allows President Trump and others an opportunity to illustrate clearly the corruption and perverted ideaology of the Democrats and those of sitting on the judicial bench.
The rights and protection of the American people vs seven terrorism-plagued countries.
Oh gee thats like kinda of a no-brainer. As President Trump has remarked . . . even a eighth grader can figure this one out.
Once the 9th puts the political, lawless decision aside, THOSE THREE JUDGES MUST BE IMMEDIATELY IMPEACHED.
Enough is enough.
They are ALL treasonous blackrobed clowns
eager for money from foreign governments like
the first meddler from the 9th circuit.
Original jurisdiction this is, and only the USSC
can hear the case.
Trump will fix your wagon on Monday.
I think that this ruling, clearly outside of the law based on what I’ve read and heard, should be grounds for impeachment. If not, Congress should take steps to remedy this situation. To allow these Mavericks to continue to impose their will rather than the law is a waste of time and money . Their record of being overturned demonstrates their poor judgment. In addition, their recent ruling has the potential to harm citizens on a nationwide basis. Why should West Coast Progressives be allowed to inhibit nationwide security just because West Coast tech firms want an open door for cheap skilled labor?
Too Late 9th... you had your chance!
After you pull on a tiger’s tail... don’t make the mistake of thinking you can pet it to smooth things over.
Run like hell or keep pulling.
Either way, eventually you are dead.
This was requested by at least on if the ninth circuit judges. It means others have reacted to the decision it is not necessarily a good sign. Some of these tons may have wanted the three judge panel to go further
(Feb 10): This morning, my worlds collided as Donald Trump tweeted (without any context) a sentence from Ben Wittes’s post on Washington v. Trump.
"LAWFARE: "Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute." A disgraceful decision! "
Once again, Trump has stumbled into an important jurisprudential point. The fact that the President is exercising powers given to him from Congress, augmented by his own inherent authorities, indicates we are in Justice Jackson’s first tier from Youngstown, where judicial scrutiny is at its minimum.
8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) allows the President to deny “entry” to “classes of aliens” he deems “detrimental to the interests of the United States.”
For more in depth . . . go to
An en banc review, initiated by one of the active judges, at least means that someone with a shred of dignity and common sense - not to mention fidelity to her or his oath as a judge - looked at the panel's opinion and probably puked. I suspect that judge was embarrassed and doesn't want to be guilty by association with what his idiot colleagues did. Also, although it's hardly going to enhance the Ninth's reputation as an ends-oriented court, if they can get the panel opinion fixed (reversed) maybe they can restore a shred of dignity. Finally, as precedent for future cases - and all challenges to future EOs will originate in District Courts within the Ninth so that appeals will be heard by the whackos and looney-birds at the Ninth - at least one judge wants to try and get this right to discourage future appeals and litigation like this, especially on the standing issue.
Just my 2-cents. Hope this helps.
9th worried that there may be a huge push to disband them.....
I believe this action is basis what Trump is about to do, not that they consider their 3 judge decision wrong. I am sure they are aware how poorly written the decision was. But remember, if Obamacare can be turned into a tax then anything can be written in attempting to thwart Trump... anything.
The practice of “judge shopping” should be stopped, it certainly doesn’t help the rule of law.
The judges are guilty of judicial overreach! They violated the US Constitution, for which they took an oath! This partisan crap on the bench is blantant and must be stopped! These judges must be made an example of! Congress can impeach them.
Judicial partisanship won’t stop unless WE make Congress stop them.
FREEPERS don’t seem to grasp that we can lose again at 9th and at SCOTUS
Unless Gorsuch whose bloom has wilted btw is confirmed first
I doubt the 9th in whole reverses mini 9th
Sessions needs another court
The Fifth Appeals would be my choice....
Congress could fix this mess
Or Trump can ignore this power grab by the judiciary
Who cares.
The Ninth Circus is not a court.
I would submit nothing to them.
They can reconsider their own asses.