Posted on 11/26/2016 8:13:18 AM PST by bray
Very good post.
The Democrats have a clear strategic plan: promote and facilitate immigration, both legal and illegal, and then harvest the votes that will become the basis for a permanent majority.
No!
The best way to deal with it is to force election law and order on the RAT states. Opposition poll watchers should be mandated.
A photo ID should be required to vote, voting illegal aliens should be deported. Double voting college students should be expelled, and their loans rescinded.
Union-thug and other vote-fraudsters should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. It should be a federal crime, and the penalties severe.
I wrote this before the Clinton campaign admitted they were behind this.
We reap what we sowed when we changed all those standards of governance ... so maybe we really have no complaint when malcontents and misfits hijack the process.
Black inner-city voters are probably a lost cause. There's a reason why their voting patterns are the same as Indians living on reservations. But the Trump administration can make some great strides in molding an "America First" agenda that has strong appeal to Latin Americans who immigrated here legitimately. A recent immigrant who is now an employed American is a perfect fit for a conservative/populist agenda that Trump and the GOP leadership can bring to the table.
My point is that Democrats have strongly opposed any attempt to impose those measures. They will only stop opposing them when they are presented with irrefutable evidence that a radical right-wing candidate (by their own standards) stole an election by using the same fraudulent voting that they've been using for years.
>> The idea that every idiot who can breathe on a mirror — and even many that can’t — should participate in the election of leaders in a free nation would have been completely alien to this country’s founders.
I totally agree with this and if it were up to me, we would move back to something closer to what the founders had in mind. At that time, only land-owners voted, with (I assume) the idea being that they were the productive citizens. I no longer think land ownership is a good test, but I do think that not being on welfare would be a good test. Those who are on the take should NEVER be allowed to vote themselves more from those who produce. (That includes Congressmen who vote themselves raises from the tax-paying public.)
IDK about MI, but in WI the law says that any candidate who’s willing and able to pay for it can request and receive a recount. As I noted above, it won’t be so easy in PA.
Re the $. The bot was depositing 160,000 per hour, day and night, into Stein’s campaign treasury, until she had enough to cover all three recounts. A lawyer prominent with Soros has been pushing the recount strategy, which is one fact that points to a Soros connection.
All humans want to be free and want to have an opportunity for economic success. We just have to make them see it and not continue to be slaves on the Democrat/Socialist plantation.
“This is an opportunistic ploy by Jill Stein to fill Green Party coffers with funds raised by promising easily duped and heartbroken voters an electoral do-over that she has no intentions of delivering.”
Like they did in Ohio 2004.
They should have to pay for Trump’s personnal that will be there to monitor the recount. All expenses should be paid by Stein(& her backers?). I will wait for Obama to use the US Gov’t to help HRC like he did during the election.
Yeah, they won’t be convince, they must be defeated.
Every Republican controlled state should attempt to put in place amendments to their constitutions that would be hard to reverse mandating permanent sensible election standards (rights).
Congress and the Trump Administration should do all they can as well at the federal level.
Agree with you. Evidently this Stein woman actually has a record of pulling these shenanigans. I just read on The_Donald subreddit that she’s done it before. She uses these recount dramas as fund raising tools to keep the Green Party going between elections.
As you said, time to make it too expensive for her to pull these destructive post election stunts. (Though in fairness, I doubt she’s ever mainlined Soros’ $ before. Five million plus in two days; a pretty nice scam/haul by Green Party standards.)
As a side note to winning elections, please consider the following.
Planned Parenthood is an example of social Darwinism at work in the misguided Democratic Party imo.
After all, after decades of promising unconstitutional federal funding for abortions to win votes from low-information women, such women probably not understanding that the feds have no constitutional authority to tax and spend for such a purpose, the Democrats have now suffered the consequences of aborting likely new Democratic voters imo.
And also, lack of "Rule Of Law" Enforcement
by those with the responsibility and authority to do so.
Disinterest ..meh !
I hope some white hats are looking into this.
I hope so too. But I’m not worried that the recounts will change the outcome. Even if they make any kind of progress in WI, they’ll go nowhere in PA. Trump’s margin is too big, and it’s almost impossible to get a recount at this stage.
One thing to bear in mind. Trump is not the average Republican. The Dems are used to cheating without consequences, but if they try the usual tricks on Trump, they’ll wish they hadn’t. He knows how to fight back—and his supporters will be behind him at every step.
If the DNC wants to stink like manure for years to come, they’ll try something illegal in the recounts. Otherwise, there is nothing to fear.
The Trump DOJ needs to start investigating Soros from day one. Expose this POS for his dirty dealings and prosecute him forthwith.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.