Antonin Scalia: 14th Amendment for all, not ‘only the blacks’
Posted on 11/21/2016 5:59:19 PM PST by rhett october
Paul Butler called Sessions a “radical extremist” who would bring “civil rights cases on behalf of white people.” White people having civil rights? What an ‘extremist’ idea! What is this world coming to? Watch and read at http://resistancefeed.com/2016/11/21/msnbc-guest-sessions-would-bring-civil-rights-cases-on-behalf-of-whites/
(Excerpt) Read more at resistancefeed.com ...
The term “racist” is so overused, it has become trite. It has no real impact other than satisfying the speaker that he is cool, hip and relevant.
What goes around, comes around.
Civil rights apply equally to all.
White people are entitled to civil rights protection too. Especially when it comes to vote fraud.
They were always insane. Marxism is always insanity-—a faith in a “utopian” system when private property rights don’t exist. It is total slavery and dehumanization——yet they sing, “Imagine”.....Let’s NOT!!!!
The Marxists need to destroy the Natural Family and are reversing Good and Evil——to the point now, where the good people like Sessions is labeled and “extremest”.
Well, Jesus was a radical and extremest I guess-—but the Marxists erase history and are ignorant of Natural Law so Up is Down, Vice is Virtue and Boys can be Girls in their sick, evil pedophile world.
Hopefully a large part of the Hussein DOJustUs will be self deporting the Dept.
As opposed to ‘Extremist’ Jarrett Would ‘Start Bringing Civil Rights Cases on Behalf of Black People’??
What they are afraid of is that minorities’ rights will no longer trump white people’s. They don’t want equality. They want privilege.
“‘Start Bringing Civil Rights Cases on Behalf of White People’”
As if White people have rights.
Sir, Please continue to broadcast this drivel. It’s stuff like this that caused white middle-class voters to go Trump, especially women.
Wouldn’t that signal a truly equal nation?
Yup! an he be a professore too. My guess is he thinks he be $hittin in tall cotton right about now!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Butler_(professor)
“Radical extremist” but not racist, too or is that implied or a given?
These people against Senator Sessions are not just hysterical, they’re racists themselves.
For instance, why are non-blacks not allowed in the congressional black caucus?
Antonin Scalia: 14th Amendment for all, not ‘only the blacks’
A wrong is a wrong is a wrong, no matter the colors of the people involved.
Butler should use the proper terms to designate where an iidividual lies on the political spectrum. A “radical extremist” lies to the left of a communist. The proper term to describe an extreme conservative is “reactionary.” This a common leftist ploy: apply terms that describe the left’s philosophy to the right and its philosophy in order to sow confusion among the electorate and cause the two political positions to appear to be undifferentiable.
wow. I was just running down the articles posted instead of doing a title search to post this thread...a must read for those who care about the SCOTUS appointments.
The Nuclear Option — Anatomy of a Smear: Before There Was Bork, There Was Sessions
from Brietbart by Charlie Hurt 11/21/2016
It all began with Jeff Sessions from Alabama. Even before they coined a term for it — Borking — they did it to Jeff Sessions, a decent man with a stellar legal reputation as a fearless and tough but fair federal prosecutor down South.
excerpt (great article):
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/21/nuclear-options-anatomy-smear-bork-sessions/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.