Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Are What You Eat: The Israelite Diet and Archaeology. Pig bones as an ethnic marker?
Biblical Archaeology dot org ^ | 11/14/2016 | Marek Dospěl

Posted on 11/16/2016 8:54:25 AM PST by fishtank

You Are What You Eat: The Israelite Diet and Archaeology

Pig bones as an ethnic marker?

Jews don’t eat pork. Every kid knows that.

Much fewer people know that the abstinence from swine’s flesh is rooted in the Biblical prohibition in Leviticus 11:7 and Deuteronomy 14:8, which means that for the ancient Israelites, pork was also off the menu.

Only specialists, however, are aware of the fact that the Biblical ban on pork consumption from the Israelite diet can be interpreted from the archaeological or (more specifically) zooarchaeological record. In short: If people didn’t eat pork, they likely didn’t raise pigs—hence the expected absence in archaeologically excavated contexts of pig bones.

Indeed, modern excavations in the southern Levant (today’s Israel, Jordan and Palestine) show remarkable scarcity or total absence of pig bones at Iron Age (1130–586 B.C.E.) sites. The only apparent exception to this pattern is the sites occupied by the Philistines, one of the Sea Peoples who migrated to the southwestern Levant sometime at the dawn of the Iron Age.

This archaeological observation—supported by the Biblical prohibition—eventually led in modern scholarship to the establishment of the presence or absence of pig bones as an ethnic marker, one that would distinguish between ancient Israelites and Philistines.

Sounds reasonable, right?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Israel; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Campion

yeah. they got to ham it up if they wanted.


21 posted on 11/16/2016 10:23:16 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: szweig
According to the Rabbi I studied with you are correct.

They even had a debate on if it was ok to use the valve from a pig heart to do heart repair.

They concluded it was ok as the pig flesh was not being consumed and it was to save a life.

22 posted on 11/16/2016 10:24:02 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Campion

The forbidden food list in Leviticus was, I believe, tied to animals that were known from the captivity in Egypt or other surrounding Canaanite people to be used in pagan sacrifices. Abstaining from the flesh of these animals as foods would be insurance against falling into these pagan rituals. It seems arbitrary to moderns because we don’t know of many, if any, examples of pagan pig sacrifices.


23 posted on 11/16/2016 10:27:42 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I believe the Samaritans have the Pentateuch so they would have had that prohibition too. They are descendants of the northern tribes of Israel.

They did not hold to the Levitical prohibitions. One of the many reasons the Jews hated them and considered them "unclean".

24 posted on 11/16/2016 10:36:58 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; Campion; rjsimmon

It’s unanimous: I need to go back to Sunday School! Thanks!


25 posted on 11/16/2016 10:51:42 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

If you are what you eat, I’m chocolate.


26 posted on 11/16/2016 11:05:35 AM PST by IM2MAD (IM2MAD=Individual Motivated 2 Make A Difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

It would be interesting to establish that even after the Jews embraced foreign gods, they maintained their aversion to pork.


27 posted on 11/16/2016 12:58:01 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

>> Then who were the people tending these pigs? <<

Gadarenes, It says plainly in the text that he had traveled to their land, across the sea. That’s on the far side of the Jordan, south of Decapolis, near where it flows into the Sea of Tiberius/See of Galilee. It was largely Hellenist.


28 posted on 11/16/2016 1:02:57 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I mean, I get points for remembering there were pig handlers in the Gospels at least, right?


29 posted on 11/16/2016 1:07:18 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dangus

But it wasn’t a universal aversion, as evidenced by the Isaiah passage:

Isaiah 65
“2 I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walketh in a way that was not good, after their own thoughts;

3 A people that provoketh me to anger continually to my face; that sacrificeth in gardens, and burneth incense upon altars of brick;

4 Which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which eat swine’s flesh, and broth of abominable things is in their vessels;”


30 posted on 11/16/2016 1:07:24 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

31 posted on 11/16/2016 1:08:55 PM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Gotcha! I knew something struck me wrong about the presumption that pork-eaters had to be gentiles.


32 posted on 11/16/2016 9:23:39 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Do Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox all have the same teaching on this?


33 posted on 11/16/2016 9:42:59 PM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kalee
Do they have the exact same teaching on anything? :) They seem to "concur in principle" and then argue the fine details to death.

It makes sense they would though if you think about it, the garments of the High Priest were to be partly of purple and scarlet, both colors which came from either a shellfish or insect not kosher for eating.

And pearls, also from a shellfish not kosher for eating, were worn.

So the prohibition was just on consuming, not touching or handling.

As far as I know they agree on it but the Rabbi was Conservative so I can not speak for every group. But I do know the agreement on the heart valve issue was from the council in Israel so that is probably pretty much universal.

34 posted on 11/17/2016 1:04:09 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Thank you.


35 posted on 11/17/2016 1:42:15 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson