Posted on 11/04/2016 1:36:42 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Friday afternoon surprise!
Just occurred to me while raking leaves: where are the lawsuits?
We’re constantly reminded this is “stolen” information, so wehre are the lawsuits?
Has anyone heard any denials of what’s in these Wikileaks emails? I know the media was tip-toeing around but what about the principals - has Huma, Mills, Podesta etc ever said they’re not true or accurate? I think if someone was falsely accusing me of spirit dinners or whatever I’d be papering the hell out of them.
And all these people are lawyers, or their pals are. So where are the lawsuits?
The earthly fix may or may not be in, but the heavenly fix is for God, always.
Jezebel might get devoured by dogs.
More artsy fartsy crap, Spirit Dinner perp mentioned....
Susan Kleinberg Participating in “TRA: Edge of Becoming,” Palazzo Fortuny, Venice - Opening June 4 - Nov. 27
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/48067
Jeepers, I hope they do sue!
Discovery would be a hoot!
I did not write it.
which is probably exactly why they don’t!
On the other hand, Trump already has said he plans to sue each of the liars who claimed he assaulted them. By the same logic, he clearly doesn’t fear discovery.
“I did not write it.”
What’s that got to do with modifying it for legibility?
From https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1986
It appears that (as we all know) George Stephanopolous is working for the Hillary campaign disguised as a journalist.
There was an interview with Peter Schweizer who wrote “Clinton Cash” with George Stephanopolous and this is the email string related to that interview. Note the email from Jesse Ferguson below which says, “great work everyone. this interview is perfect. he lands nothing and everything is refuted (mostly based on our work).”
I guess George runs things by the Clinton people before his show.
Re: ‘This Week’ Transcript: ‘Clinton Cash’ Author Peter Schweizer
From:nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
To: kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
CC: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, jferguson@hillaryclinton.com, jschwerin@hillaryclinton.com, HRCrapid@googlegroups.com
Date: 2015-04-26 15:24
Subject: Re: ‘This Week’ Transcript: ‘Clinton Cash’ Author Peter Schweizer
Not to pile on, but this is therapeutic to watch. George is cool as a cucumber, doesn’t rush into it, but just destroys him slowly but surely over the course of the interview, culminating when he asks him about A/S
Fernandez confirming that HRC had absolutely nothing to do with the Uranium 1 deal.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Karen Finney kfinney@hillaryclinton.com wrote:
It was beautiful to watch
On Apr 26, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Jennifer Palmieri jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com wrote:
This is amazing. A pleasure to read.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 26, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Jesse Ferguson jferguson@hillaryclinton.com wrote:
great work everyone. this interview is perfect. he lands nothing and everything is refuted (mostly based on our work)
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Josh Schwerin jschwerin@hillaryclinton.com wrote:
‘This Week’ Transcript: ‘Clinton Cash’ Author Peter Schweizer Apr 26, 2015, 9:34 AM ET
*This is a rush transcript for April 26, 2015. It will be updated and may contain errors.*
****and the transcript starts here but I’m not going to put it here because it will take too much work to format.****
Sustainability? Is that the excuse these foundations use to collect money from foreign governments? Because it’s something that is totally unmeasurable so you don’t have to deliver any results and can still pretend you did something?
Usually the polls slowly correct, but they don’t give a damn about the integrity of the pollsters this time.
______
True.
They know this is the last election ever. Does John Kasich?
What happened to the Comey announcement that was supposed to be today?
Starland Vocal Band had something to say about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu1UXCdyNo0
I was thinking the same - maybe waiting until weekend?
Hoping someone was going to drop something big today!
Um...in the future it might be easier for us if you Direct Link to the Wikileaks itself rather than to the Wikileaks Twitter which links to the Wikileaks, thereby eliminating a step.
It is because everything is at stake this time. If they can push it over the finish line then they own everything and see nothing short of an armed insurrection that could put rocks in their way. they also believe that they candela with an armed insurrection. These are people who are contemplating a radical cleansing of the society and that will require top down violence as it always does. The kind of government they will cap us with always does some level of the Pol Pot process. The Gopes who go along with the process in hopes of being incorporated into the New State or at least in hopes of being squashed last will be the first to g - in show trials- as examples to the rest of the population and warnings to their own.
The Wikileaks revelations over the past weeks have been so outlandish as to make a person jaded. The stuff is so off the wall that most folks would interpret it as pure fabrication. When the subject of occult practices is explored with any seriousness, it is not a sense of outrage that ensues, but a sense of disbelief, so that as if by the wave of a wand, incredulity evaporates. The practitioners of evil simply say, “There’s nothing to see here,” and the innocent carry on their merry way as if relieved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.