Posted on 10/30/2016 4:08:46 AM PDT by Buttons12
Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement 10/29/16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7dsoLH26YA
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
(Of course, she also thinks Comey should have done differently back in July.)
I thoroughly disagree with Pirro in this case.
Her own situation is NOT similar.
Hillary ALREADY had a case file. It was REOPENED and not newly opened.
I can value that, but...Hillary brought this upon herself by using a private server and she’s known there can be consequences.
Yes, the original sin was Hillary’s use of the private server with no security.
Full Show Last Night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLYr-oc81M4
I understand where Pirro is coming from but I don;t necessarily agree with her entire statement.
What I will agree with is : it is long past time for the Clintons to have gone away. The only way we, the public, will escape their trailer trash soap opera lives will be with their deaths. Which for Hillary may be sooner than later. Even Bubba looks like he’s not long for this world either.
And with good riddance.
Apparently their is a rebellion of career FBI agents who are not happy with the prospect of becoming Hillary’s SS against her opposition, and they mutinied against Captain Comey.
And if the reason for the server was a ‘pay to play’ scheme the American people should know before an election.
I lost a little respect for the Judge after this monologue. I sensed she was just protecting her arse as she worried her favorably jumping on the Comey re-investigation bandwagon would make her look hypocritical.
I disagree with her, as honest and forthright as she is. I think that she is letting her experience in NY running for election has biased her thoughts on it. Regardless, that’s neither here nor there.
Her ‘beef’ about it being unfair to Hillary (and thus, her by extension) is because of “long-standing ‘policy’.”
The last time I looked ‘policy’ is not LAW - that’s for Congress and the Senate to decide along with a President (if he can’t be overridden.)
Democrats are infamous for ‘violating policy.’ The Senate most notorious in the legislative branch, and Obama in the Executive branch (IRS, EPA you name it).
It is nor was illegal for Comey to do this. He violated department policy and that’s up to him to handle (discipline or firing, resigning or whatever).
My belief, as unadvisable as it is/was his most recent faux pas is no different than his famous summer pardon/coverup issued to Hillary. And we must also remember that he had a duty to report to the Congress results from his investigation. If this gave him cover in the summer, it gives him cover now - in other words, a policy not applied fairly is not a policy; it is just a political tool.
That’s correct. And didn’t Comey violate policy when he said that Hillary should not be prosecuted. Wasn’t he supposed to only report to the AG the results of investigation?
Lynch surrendered her authority of the decision to not prosecute, putting the onus on Comey. But in the process she magnified the power of the FBI Director. So now Comey plays the Queen of Spades.
bitch bitch bitch
Good point. Also, Pirro and the rest of us don’t know
whether or not there is info that opens up a whole new
can of scum. For all we know Huma and Hellary could
have been discussing the disposal of the body of a
recent Clinton victim.
It is a safe bet that nobody on the other side would
ever get their panties in a twist if the shoe were
on the other foot.
Let her burn.
Hillary planned the crime, she planned the coverup, she doesn’t get to plan the revelation of the investigation, though she tried
This seems a good place to repeat:
If policy is not to act to influence an election, the with holding of evidence would be such an act. If there is a situation in which two actions would be in violation of policy, then it would be most ethical to take the action which reveals, not conceals, the truth.
Cap Weinberger...Cap Weinberger...Cap Weinberger.
I know what she’s saying, but look at what Trump supporters have had to deal with the media’s bias.
“...then it would be most ethical to take the action which reveals, not conceals, the truth.”
I like it.
Pirro was wrong. 9 hot and 8 crazy on this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.