This is pre-suasion.
They are trying to tell Trump supporters that all is lost, they should be dejected and stay home.
Ignore the elite.
Kick ‘em in the a$$!
VOTE TRUMP!
USD/MXN up over 1% today. If it can manage a multi-day rally, Goldman may start to change its tune.
Heidi Cruz is back to her GS day job, yes?
They tend to get what they pay for.
Translation: we’ve poured big big bucks into getting this grifting criminal elected and we’ll make sure that we’ve bought enough voting machines, imported enough illegal democrats, paid off enough “journalists:, and bribed enough voting officials to make us sure that we’ve rightfully bought off this election.
The big hedge fund companies make fake projections to manipulate markets to their advantage all the time. No reason to believe they believe what they are saying. Everything Goldman Sachs says is intended for their own advantage with unholy heaps of money at stake for them.
Wrong on both accounts. It is an idea, and the polls are designed to create opinion, not measure it. Keep wishing its different.
ok commies - you have your instructions - don’t expect Trump to win - it’s over, stay home.
Message to Freedom loving Trump supporters - Goldman is SCARED of us. Big Trump win is rolling through.
Further proof of why its nickname is Government Sachs.
I think Trump is going to win - if voter fraud doesn’t happen on a mass scale. What I like to do is read non-political websites and read the comments, and to me it looks like the general public is 90% for Trump. Here is one example- an article on Trump on Yahoo.com and the comments are almost all for Trump. Hillary is going to be destroyed Nov. 8th
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/exclusive-trump-says-clinton-policy-syria-lead-world-192023608.html
Dem Talking Litman head on FOX just now, “Let’s not kid the viewers. Trump has absolutely no path to become President.”
“By comparison, the final London Telegraph poll heading into the June 23 vote had the “remain” vote with a comfortable 4-point lead. Betting odds in the U.K. had given “remain” an 88 percent chance of prevailing, against the “leave” victory of 4 points.”
American Patriots are as equally fed up as the Brits were with losing their country/sovereignty to third worlders...I believe the wind is behind Trump...If Patriots turn out for this election and the voter fraud can be reasonably contained, I do believe Trump wins, which means America wins.
They put their money on 666—just trying to get that roll on their weighted roulette wheel. :-)
They have far too much to lose to stop trying.
They will FAIL.
The voters KNOW Trump is the "man with the PLAN."
Gee, why don’t we dispense with the charade of elections and just have Goldman Sachs choose our President every four years? It would be a lot cheaper and less stressful. /s
How much sense would it make to expect a surprise? Is, “Don’t expect a surprise” what passes for profundity these days?
When the ploy of discouraging Trump supporters doesn’t pay off, they have already put the “Russians hacked the election” narrative so that the criminals can void the election and keep control. That’s when the REAL fight starts. God help us.
Government: The power
Media: The message
Wall St.: The funding
Ted Cruz, is that you??
Goldman-Sachs, the company for corrupt politicians like Ted Cruz and Hillary Clinton.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, on the 19th.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]