Posted on 10/20/2016 8:35:00 AM PDT by Scarpetta
Could Hillary's smile cost her the election? Twitter mocks Clinton's 'creepy grandma' grin as she smirks her way through presidential debate
CAPTION: The Democratic candidate faced a flood of insults as she took to the stage at the University of Las Vegas on Wednesday, with many viewers confessing they were 'creeped out' by her stubborn grin. Hundreds took to Twitter to describe her smile as 'scary' and 'creepy'. Others questioned why, when being slammed with insults from her opponent, her expression did not drop.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The image of Trump saying that ISIS throws gay people off buildings and Hillary breaking into a big toothy joker style grin was disturbing.
She’s mocking Parkinson’s suffers by not fessing up to her affliction.
It’s my understand that various kinds of facial expressions are “learned” by people with Parkinson’s in an attempt to hide their disease...specifically to hide certain facial “ticks” that are sometimes seen in those with the disease.I’m not 100% sure of my memory here (maybe *I* have Parkinson’s) but if I’m wrong I hope some Freeper with medical training will set me straight.
“This sounded so strange to me at the time. We tried a “chimpanzee smile” by covering our top teeth and showing our bottom teeth. It felt pretty silly to do, but they explained that a human smile is seen as a threatening expression to chimpanzees. When they are afraid or when they are trying to be intimidating, they will show all their top teeth and do what we call a “fear grimace.”
Hillary is displaying the great ape “fear grimace”
It is fashionable among Democrat women. They all walk around all the time showing their teeth. A whole industry of teeth whitener has developed around the fad
http://www.chimpsanctuarynw.org/blog/2013/09/chimpanzee-smiles/
she looks like a mule eating briars.
That's my thought. So many people are just stupid. Yes, sheeple. I try to talk to everyone I come in contact with tho. Some really do tell me they're stuck on their vote due to physical appearance. It's all i can do not to slap 'em. I would if it would actually impart sense.
amen
My wife is a recovering lib... but she’s one of those “... both are qually bad...” types.
I am working hard to get out of her JUST what makes Trump so bad??
So far, she has no answers.
There’s NO comparison between Clinton negatives and Trump negatives.
I want more of those stories of employers scouring the parking lot of their business looking for “conflicting” bumper stickers and firing those employees in direct conflict to their interests. Stupidity should hurt and leave a scar.
"You think this is funny? men, women and childen were beheaded, and Women and girls raped repeatedly because of your incompetence"!
She smiles like a typical slimy goofball liberal b*tch. Hah Hah Hah, I am so superior to this person. Smile/ smirk at Putin you airhead and see how much Hah Hah Hah there is.
Think of the fun “Jeff Duham” could have with that new Dummy
He just stands by what he says and wavers not.
haha, I've never heard of the term church key, had to look it up, learn something new everyday.
Yup. I agree.
My Hubby is self-employed. When he gets covered up in work he either sub-contracts or hires temps. Neither of us are bashful about telling the sheeple how the cow ate the cabbage. Have to say, Hubby is more tactful than me. He seems to sometimes get through to them. As my kids say, I just “go all red-head” on them. At least with the subcontractors and temps it’s easy to get rid of them.
There is no excuse for stupid, God gave people brains and He expects us to use them. I have yet to find a lib with a convincing argument for anything...I suspect they don’t even know how to wipe their rears.
Each day as I pray for the nation and then again when I see the daily threads here for praying for Trump/Pence, that is one of the primary scriptures that holds me steady. Very cool that I saw you post it. I should have explained more than just “amen.” I see your comment as confirmation from God :)
My grandparents always refered to them as church keys :)
Nice reminisce back to the folks who immersed me in conservative values.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
HERE HERE, MR.FLAX, YOU ARE RIGHT ON.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.