Posted on 10/19/2016 8:42:58 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Why in the hell do we have 17 security agencies?
With all of these security agencies guarding us, how in the hell did Russia (or anyone else) break in to our government servers? Are these agencies incompetent or what?
And in particular, why was our state department's servers so vulnerable to hackers?
Is this a sample of how a president Hillary will secure our nation's secrets?
The government may be playing some sort of double game here, allowing Russia into some areas that they would naturally be probing, so that they can use this “finding” for political purposes, all part of a pre-authorized agenda to link Putin to Trump and make Clinton look tough, which of course is pretty much the opposite of what one would think if one just followed the evidence.
Another double game is less political and more strategic, to allow your adversary to think they are getting valuable information when it is false information. But in the process they may have inadvertently revealed these e-mails.
I doubt that very many independent voters think that Trump is a “puppet” of Putin, in fact, I think one of his best chances to win the election lies in the theme of him being able to get along with Putin and turn the current situation into something much more productive and aligned with real as opposed to imaginary geopolitical goals.
As you say, though, the chances that wikileaks are a Russian operation are a lot less than 100% — other plausible actors are China, and individuals not acting for any state. The actual security concern is hard to assess, in this byzantine environment of spy vs spy, false flags and planted lies. The whole espionage game is always clouded by the unknown real worth of the information you have “uncovered.” As with Trump’s sexual history, just saying something doesn’t prove it to be true.
It’s just another Liberal/Clinton boogeyman to divert attention from their own incompetance.
If she really does have confirmation from this many intelligence organizations it begs the question on how she is privy to such information when Trump is not? Wouldn’t this information be classified under an active investigation? How can she remember this information but remember nothing of her activities as SoS?
I think she lies.
I can tell you without even reading it that it is not valid. The only "evidence" for Russian hackers is that the DNC immediately called a former Russian hacker to find evidence for Russian hacking last spring. The report from that hacker, Dmitri Alperovitch, is complete BS.
The real question is why we have 17 different security agencies?
yea, i’m unsure if there’s 17. i could prolly name 8-10. 17? unlikely.
anyone want to take a guess which agencies she’s referring to??
Heck, even wikipedia has an entry listing 16.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community
I’d like to hear Hillary (without an earpiece) name those 17 security agencies.
In other words either she gets top secret information daily, and is privy to the fact that all 17 ( count’em) security agencies have hard and fast evidence that the Russian government hacked her private aol.com account Or she is lying. Or it is a mixture of both lies and security breaches on her part.
By the way, a month or two ago it was widely reported that both candidates ( Trump and Hillary) received official security briefing. Now as a private citizen, if she alone is getting additional secret security briefings( either openly or through clandestine means) , something is rotten.
For those who don’t remember, in 1960 JFK was brought up to speed during the campaign with a security briefing and during the debate with Nixon, then VPOTUS, leaked some of that information re: Cuba in order to make a political point against Nixon. Nixon could have called him on it, but decided that by doing so it would have compromised US security just as much, so he had enough honor to refrain
She has absolutely NO honor and there is NOTHING that woman will not do or say to achieve power. No lie is too small.
They probably reported that China/N. Korea/Russia/Israel and a host of others have all done hacking and they use the fact that Russia was also mentioned to make it the focus.....
The Russians hacked Podestas emails but not Hillarys wide open Gmail server with all our secret and signal intelligence on it.
Hey Hillary you are full of crap
Of course Russia tries to hack our systems. Don’t we do the same to them?
She thinks the FSB is a US Security Agency.
As I understand it right now, Clinton violated top secret info last night when she verified as a former secretary of state that our launch time for nuclear missiles is 4 minutes.
I agree with that because launch time is a system/process and I know for a fact that the US military classifies such things.
NO HILLARY
They Hacked YOUR PERSONAL SERVER!!
All it tells us, when we hear “all 17 agencies say HILLARY is right”, is that the Clintons and their fellow globalists own those 17 agencies as well. There’s that much more corruption than we knew about previously. I do not think that statement helped her at all.
If 17 security agencies say it is Russia hacking emails, why don’t they put forward proof? As Lanny Davis (Clinton hack) always says, there is not a scintilla of evidence about Russia hacking any computers.
Overlooked in the discussion is the fact that the statements about Russia were provided not by “security agencies” but rather by Obama administration apparatchiks fronting for the agencies
The statements can be taken with the same truth as those of FBI director Comey or the President himself. The agencies are declaring “if you like your plan you can keep it”
bkmark
Then sells the contents to anyone willing to “donate” money to the Clinton Foundation and Slush Fund.
How is Hillary not being ridiculed for this outlandish statement? The fact that the DNI releases the purported opinion of the intelligence community does not mean that each of the 17 agencies looked into this and fingered the Russians. I mean, it is just silly to suggest that, among these 17 agencies, Coast Guard Intelligence, Marine Corps Intelligence, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Energy Department (!) know a thing about this or have any capability of looking into it. Or how about the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, which is responsible for maps and satellite photos? This is beyond laughable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.