Dangerous, but true.
Remember the Justice Department Attorney that resigned because he wasn’t allowed to prosecute voter intimidation in Philadelphia?
Whaddya know.....he got today’s talking points memo too!
Voter fraud itself is not dangerous - just talking about voter fraud is dangerous. Get it?
jeez....
I remember the Democrats saying that when Sore Loserman got their head handed to them.
Oh, sorry, I DON’T remember that.
Many areas of Philadelphia with over 100% votes over the registrations. How about that Gov. Wolf?
its only dangerous when republicans make the claim. Sanders saying it is a rigged system and democrats claiming President George W Bush was selected not elected are okay.
Truth is dangerous!
If you listen carefully to these hacks on the MSM CBS, etc, they are trying to bend the narrative to say Trump is claiming the election is rigged at the State level attempting to anger the states, but this is at the TOP level in DC! Drain the swamp!
Damn right they are. And is way past time we put a stop to it.
for the governor of PA, of all states, to be singing this fairy tale of a song about how there’s no voter fraud
ha ha
the IRONY of it!
As I recall, Philadelphia is still in PA.... where the deceased, illegal, and unregistered vote routinely, and often?
Dangerous because Trump is calling this toady out on his boys in Philly doing bad stuff
“claims”?
How dumb!!
It’s more than a ‘claim’ when you have documented PROOF and EVIDENCE!
I assume he’ll be getting on board with those who want to cleanup the voter roles (i.e. remove dead people) and required ID to vote. It’s been decades of claims that voter fraud happens. You’d think Ds could find a way to calm those fears without disenfranchising anyone. It would be to the Ds advantage to have everyone thing that D wins are legitimate. Unless the claims are true and Ds want the fraud.
Dangerous to who?
Pray America wakes
Was at a clients house today. Not sure who they were listening to or interviewing on NPR radio, but they were talking about Trump and the voter fraud.
They are working real hard to discredit him and the statistics he is quoting. But, having been a poll worker here in lovely Cuyahoga county, Ohio...it happens more than anyone thinks. Last time I tried working the polls, reports went unanswered and the Republicans couldn’t even get poll workers credentials on time. No recording devices are allowed, no cellphones, etc. And the questionable votes later counted because, “they couldn’t identify the fraudulent votes.”
Are the claims ‘dangerous?’ ONLY when the ballot box is meaningless.
In the wake of the 2012 presidential race, voting records from the Cuyahoga County Ohio board of elections have revealed that Barack Obama received more than 99 percent of the vote in more than 100 precincts in that county on Election Day. In fact, there were several Cleveland precincts where Mitt Romney received exactly zero votes.
Robert Knight is a senior fellow and executive director at the American Civil Rights Union. He says there were similar anomalies in Philadelphia.
Knight, Robert (ACRU)”According the Philadelphia Enquirer, in 59 different voting precincts there wasn’t a single vote cast for Mitt Romney,” he tells OneNewsNow. “It was 99.9 percent for Barack Obama. That just doesn’t even happen in communist countries. And the same thing happened, apparently, in Cuyahoga County, which is Cleveland, Ohio.”
http://onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2012/11/16/precincts-with-0-votes-for-romney-suggest-voter-fraud
Sometimes you can tell someone is a democrat just by looking at them.
Just a second. He said new voters have to show ID. I thought the Supreme Court said they don’t have to?
Why is it the GOP is so reluctant to fight the system? I recall in WA state when Gregoire beat Rossi after a recount they did nothing to contest the recount. (just one of many examples)
Of course they are dangerous. Someone might look into it and find out he is right.