Posted on 10/13/2016 4:52:04 PM PDT by bryan999
New York Times VP and Assistant General Counsel David McCraw sent the below letter to Donald Trump’s legal team in response to a retraction request about The Times’s article Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately
(Excerpt) Read more at nytco.com ...
I can’t believe the outright nerve of this 3rd rate newspaper!! It’s unreal!
Thank you for playing.
They think they are the walls of Jerecho?
I think we’ll soon see who hires better lawyers
As much as I hate to say it, Trump doesn’t have a case here.
ALL POLITICAL SPEECH IS PROTECTED SPEECH, even the lies...
The difference is that if the NYT did this against Hillary or another high-ranking Dem, they would be “Interviewed” by Some Democrat in the Justice Department.
“Our reporters worked diligently...”
A lie within a lie!
I hear that the NYT, its owners, employees, and readers all don’t pay their fair share of taxes.
I think at this point Trump should let the lawyers handle it and move on. He made his point, and doesn’t have time left before the election to waste on a pissing contest with the NYT.
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
There primary defense is libel about sexual advances cannot harm Trump’s reputation, not that it’s true.
We will soon see if Putz is a “puppy”.
I would care, but right now I’m distracted by images of Hillary laughing at the 12 year old girl who was raped, and threatening those other innocent victims. Making them afraid for their lives.
Can he sue the women?
Sorry for the multiple posts...
“As much as I hate to say it, Trump doesn’t have a case here. ALL POLITICAL SPEECH IS PROTECTED SPEECH, even the lies...”
doesn’t matter. the point is that trump is willing to go to the mat with the NYT, including discovery on both sides, meaning that trump has nothing to hide that would lend veracity to the NYT lies. public figures almost never sue in these cases because they don’t have the money and they have something to hide anyway.
“Can he sue the women?”
I’m no lawyer, but I’d say yes, he could sue them PERSONALLY.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.