I can’t believe the outright nerve of this 3rd rate newspaper!! It’s unreal!
Thank you for playing.
They think they are the walls of Jerecho?
I think we’ll soon see who hires better lawyers
As much as I hate to say it, Trump doesn’t have a case here.
ALL POLITICAL SPEECH IS PROTECTED SPEECH, even the lies...
The difference is that if the NYT did this against Hillary or another high-ranking Dem, they would be “Interviewed” by Some Democrat in the Justice Department.
I hear that the NYT, its owners, employees, and readers all don’t pay their fair share of taxes.
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
Anybody who thinks the NYT was going to roll over is not paying attention..
There primary defense is libel about sexual advances cannot harm Trump’s reputation, not that it’s true.
I would care, but right now I’m distracted by images of Hillary laughing at the 12 year old girl who was raped, and threatening those other innocent victims. Making them afraid for their lives.
Come on, Assange...drop an atom b0mb.
F McGraw!
He knows damn well nothing matters except if the charges are true or not.
If they aren’t, he’s going to cost the NYTs a bundle.
Further, he’s all high and mighty about their voices being heard. Has his paper let the voices of Clinton’s rape victims be heard, something far more personal and damaging, for life?
Did his paper publish the account of the 12 year old who Hillary laughed at and called a tramp, after defending a man she knew was guilty, successfully getting him off?
Did the paper mention that she was brutally raped at 12 years of age, beaten so bad she was left in a coma for days, and was never able to have children do to her injuries?
Hillary Clinton denigrated her and laughed at this 12 year old rape victim, victim of a brutal beating, left in a coma for day, and unable to have children EVER.
F this di—less jerk and the paper of no morals, no class, and “no-record” as well.
The NY Times was not about to let go of an issue that harms the Trump campaign and candidacy. To them, as well as the democrats, the goal is to win at any cost. The NY Times, along with the majority of the media, are just the “media wing” of the democratic party. If Hillary wants to keep the lies about Trump in the “news” then the NY Times and all of the democratic party media machines will comply.
To Hillary and her complicit media, causing as much damage now to Trump is all that matters, even if they are all or almost all, lies. With just over 3 weeks left in the campaign, they know that Trump cannot respond soon enough to stop the lies, and by the time that Trump had a chance to respond, through lawsuits or whatever, the election season would be over, and Hillary might have gotten elected. Once the election is over, and Hillary has won, it would be too late for Trump to do anything about it, and the election could not get a “do over” if it did turn out that Hillary and the Times and all others were, indeed, lying about Trump “abusing all those women”.
What Hillary and the media are doing, is running scared, and so, they had to create preemptive campaign full of lies about Trump abusing women. Hillary and her campaign and the liberal media expected Trump to march out a list of women who were abused by Bill Clinton and Hillary, so, Hillary and the media just wanted to turn the tables on Trump, and so, that’s where we’re at now, with Trump getting bogged down defending himself, and Hillary reaping the benefits.
Hitler and the butchers of the old USSR and China and Cuba and Venezuela, would be very proud of the tactics being deployed by the Hillary campaign and the complicit liberal media. The USSR had Pravda as their media operation, while Hillary and democrats have most of the media serving as their Pravda.
The U.S. will, at sometime in the future, end up like the old USSR, in shambles.
The Times can claim that Trump had a poor reputation before so their story wasn't significant. But I was a voracious Times reader for 50 years or so before I abandoned them, and I cannot recall anything they ever wrote during that time that was critical of Donald Trump.
ML/NJ
but wait....there’s more!
Melania fires one across Time/Life/People’s bow:
https://twitter.com/melaniatrump
)
Who owns the New York Times slim?
Mexican Billionaire Carlos Slim Becomes Top Owner of New York Times. After doubling his stake in New York Times, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim has become the top shareholder of the New York Times. Reuters reports that Slim has exercised warrants purchased in 2009 that double his holdings in the paper to 16.8 percent.
Do they have ANY idea of who they are messing with??? This could be the undoing of ALL media...Trump will not let go...he is a ‘viper’ and his bite is deadly...ask the 16 candidates that ran against him, ask the Clinton campaign, they have NEVER been this ‘bashed’ before, and he hasn’t even started...
I remember when I was on the East Coast, he would fight City Hall and he would win, and he didn’t quit until he did...
This Man is amazing, his life, how he raised his family, his business, the people that REALLY know this Man have nothing but good to say about him, he was never called RACIST or had any shame brought towards him until the Clinton Filth showed up, and you can tell what they are going to throw at him by watching and listening to what filth surrounds them and what comes out of their mouth...
The New York Slimes Newspaper has bit the dust...they just don’t know it yet...