Posted on 10/10/2016 6:52:23 PM PDT by jazusamo
Edited on 10/10/2016 7:14:05 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
ST. LOUIS
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
What the hell did these idiots think? Are they really that stupid?
“This vile hag liberal fascist didnt even mention the Constitution or Rule of Law when asked at debate what type of SCOTUS appointee she desired.”
The author of the Branch Davidian and Elian Gonzales stories - Janet Reno!
Vote TRUMP! Don't give Killary the chance to do further damage to our country via the SCOTUS.
Tagline.
The supreme court has always been a red herring.
The court can't write law from the bench yet congress allows them to by not impeaching then executing the tyrannical ‘justice’
yes.....legislating liberal agenda for not just years but for decades.
THIS is THE most important reason to Support Donald J. Trump!
In other words, the Court can -- and does! -- write law from the bench.
Those who aid and abet Hillary are doing so with open eyes - they want us to become a slave nation.
How to neutralize Orren Hatch? That weasel gave us Sotomayor and Kagen two totally unqualified hacks.
How could Hillary not mention the Constitution in her answer?
She wants a political court which legislates her progressive policies from the bench. Nowhere does she say, imply or infer she wants a Supreme Court which decides cases based on the Constitution. She wants a court that
Anyone willing to take this country in this direction is a fool. A President Clinton & GOP Senate majority will be the same as a President Clinton and a Democrat Senate majority. How many times have we heard "the President deserves his nominees (or at least a hearing)." McConnell might flap his wings, but in the end what is best for DC far outweighs what is best for the rest of the country.
We know what she wants. "...a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders..." If the never-Trumpers or those with sensitive ears are willing to make her dreams a reality, God help us.
I find it fascinating that even conservative writers have to use adjectives like ‘flawed’ and ‘disgraced’ when describing Trump. Funny, I never see any negative adjectives used concerning Hildebeast.
That is because this vile hag wants to change the constitution to serve her own sick agenda. Every time I think that I have heard it all....she opens her mouth again.
The people that will vote for her want this...They want the government to take care of them, give them free stuff, protect them, tell them how to raise their children, what to eat, what to drive, how to speak etc....They are sheep
They do not understand that she is a “used car salesman” and can sell anything to gullible Americans.
Plenty of sheep on our side, sadly. Once she stacks the courts it will take generations to repair the damage....if ever.
This is probably the only thing Trump should bring up right now.
Right on, my friend.
Hillary admits she wants an activist court - it should galvanize all but the 25% left wingers in our country.
But no, even Ryan has basically said he’ll live with an activist court, as long as he stays in power.
I agree, Ryan will betray anyone or any principle to stay in power.
For both sides. I'm sure there are as many people who will vote for Clinton because of Supreme Court appointments as there are those who will vote for Trump for the same reason.
If Hillary is elected, I fully expect Ruth Bader Ginsburg to resign on Inauguration Day. I'm frankly surprised she didn't resign while Obama was President, because the Republicans in the Senate sure wouldn't have been any great opposition to most anyone he'd pick to replace her.
But then, if this one issue gets a million or two folks out of their houses to vote for Trump, that would work for me!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.