Skip to comments.
How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Vox ^
| August 22, 2016
| Dylan Matthews
Posted on 08/23/2016 4:14:41 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
A liberal Court could end long-term solitary confinement. It could mandate better prison conditions in general, making it more costly to maintain mass incarceration. It could conceivably end the death penalty. It could uphold tough state campaign finance rules and start to move away from Citizens United. It could start to develop a robust right to vote and limit gerrymandering. It could strengthen abortion rights, moving toward viewing abortion rights as a matter of equal protection for women.
If Donald Trump wins in November, this is all moot. But if he loses, as polls increasingly indicate, the dawn of a new era of liberal jurisprudence could be upon us.
(Excerpt) Read more at vox.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; judges; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Clintonfatigued
In other words, it could completely ignore stare decisis.
2
posted on
08/23/2016 4:15:59 PM PDT
by
fwdude
(If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
To: Clintonfatigued
There should never be allowed to be a fully liberal or fully conservative supreme court.
3
posted on
08/23/2016 4:16:28 PM PDT
by
FreedomStar3028
(Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
To: Jim Robinson; BuckeyeTexan; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; ...
You read it there, taxpayer-funded abortions, more violent criminals let loose, the death penalty overturned, voting rights for criminals, illegal aliens, and dead people, as well as undermining the 1st and 2nd Amendments.
This more than anything else is what’s at stake.
4
posted on
08/23/2016 4:18:03 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The barbarians are inside because there are no gates)
To: Clintonfatigued
A liberal SCOTUS has already re-shaped America. Ask Roberts.
5
posted on
08/23/2016 4:18:26 PM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: Clintonfatigued
This is like asking how being 200 pounds again is going to affect my life.
You daydream about it, fantasize, relish the moment, then come back to reality :)
6
posted on
08/23/2016 4:18:55 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: Clintonfatigued
Garland will never get confirmed to the Court.
To: Timpanagos1
If Hillary Clinton is elected (ugh!), Garland may be the best we can hope for.
8
posted on
08/23/2016 4:21:08 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(The barbarians are inside because there are no gates)
To: Clintonfatigued
Liberals never look into the future..If the liberal supreme court does that ,a conservative court can to.If Trump wins in November ,will libs scream about his use of executive orders?Of course they will.All he has to do is smile and say,I`m just doing what Obama did .I`m following his rules.If you like your rules,others can use them against you.
To: Clintonfatigued
10
posted on
08/23/2016 4:22:56 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: Clintonfatigued
Disfiguring America is more like it
11
posted on
08/23/2016 4:23:13 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
To: Clintonfatigued
I’m glad that I’m much closer to the grave than to the cradle.But I *am* ashamed that it was *my* generation,the “boomers”,that started this decent down the toilet.
To: Clintonfatigued
How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America The first thing you need to remember about posting things from "Vox" is that if it's on "Vox" it's utter nonsense.
13
posted on
08/23/2016 4:25:02 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Clintonfatigued
If Hillary were to win, Garland’s nomination will be withdrawn the day after the election.
To: FreedomStar3028
There should never be allowed to be a fully liberal or fully conservative supreme court. Because splitting the difference between good and evil always works out so well.
15
posted on
08/23/2016 4:25:42 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: Jacquerie
The 17th Amendment, a Mistake That Keeps on Giving. The 24th amendment. The amendment that bloody well killed us.
16
posted on
08/23/2016 4:26:47 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: fwdude
stare decisis is a made up/bull feces legal "tradition" that can easily be superceeded by a majority which again makes that concept laughable under a "living Constitution". Respect to the fundamentals of the Constitution can be ignored at will. What makes a sane person think stare decisis is immune to deference as well?
Also stare decisis is based on some awful decisions as well, so who cares. The legal profession is just a haven for the top notch BS artists to have an arena to play in and be well compensated for their efforts. Natural Law/Common Law are victimized by the well skilled "artists", yeah for bad civil laws that pervert the logical components of Common Law.
17
posted on
08/23/2016 4:29:50 PM PDT
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: Gay State Conservative
A friend of mine sets the start of the descent as the 1960s. He’s probably right. The lefties won and are not the establishment.
18
posted on
08/23/2016 4:30:10 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
To: DiogenesLamp
Yes. It’s okay to eat dog poop,
if you only eat just a little. /s
19
posted on
08/23/2016 4:31:17 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
To: FreedomStar3028
There should never be allowed to be a fully liberal or fully conservative supreme court. Unlike the scotus that fast tracked Obamacare and same sex marriage. All you need to know is Reagan (or Nancy) nominated Justice Kennedy despite his known same sex affiliations and the House of Bush Chief Justice Roberts. So much for 3 decades of voting republican.I guess the oligarchs have ways I cannot comprehend.
20
posted on
08/23/2016 4:31:38 PM PDT
by
Calusa
(Let our children be dreamers, too! Donald Trump (and Kellyanne Conway))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson