Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EARTH-LIKE PLANET AROUND PROXIMA CENTAURI DISCOVERED
the universe today ^ | 13 Aug , 2016 | by Matt Williams

Posted on 08/13/2016 8:51:10 PM PDT by ckilmer

The hunt for exoplanets has been heating up in recent years. Since it began its mission in 2009, over four thousand exoplanet candidates discovered by the Kepler mission, several hundred of which have been confirmed to be “Earth-like” (i.e. terrestrial). And of these, some 216 planets have been shown to be both terrestrial and located within their parent star’s habitable zone (aka. “Goldilocks zone”).

(Excerpt) Read more at universetoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: acesat; alphacentauric; apod; astronomy; exoplanet; nasa; planet; proximacentauri; proximacentaurib; science; space; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: wastoute
Read THree Body Problem. It was a Prometeus Award nominee. I'm on the novel judging committee.
101 posted on 08/14/2016 8:56:07 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

I can’t wait for Death’s End. The story itself is sort of written poorly, IMHO but the wealth of new ideas is stunning.


102 posted on 08/14/2016 9:03:44 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
We!!, that’s 450 hundreds!............

Lol, good one.

103 posted on 08/14/2016 9:07:19 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (Nuke Saudi Arabia now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Awgie
The science of tomorrow will always seem like magic today.

On the contrary, Apollo technology from the 60s seems like magic today.

104 posted on 08/14/2016 9:08:20 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (Nuke Saudi Arabia now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: All

I don’t know, whose to we can’t come up with some “warp” like technology? Doesn’t mean humans can travel that fast but certainly artificial life (robotics) can. They are talking about nanotechnology that might be able to achieve some sort of warp speed so who knows.


105 posted on 08/14/2016 9:16:55 AM PDT by MichelleWSC3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: citizen
figure on a constant acceleration to the far off place in the 1G range via nuclear-powered engine or nuke plus light sail, perhaps. Acceleration at 1G allows travelers to live in more or less “normal” gravity or so it would seem.

Theoretically correct, but not possible practically. No power source even nuclear capable of it. Do the math. 200 days at 1G = 104,727 miles/second or 56% lightspeed. Much faster and you'll start getting into relativistic effects (Making the math a lot harder). 100% efficient conversion would require 1/2 mv2 energy. total conversion of the mass you're accelerating to energy is E=mC2.

If you take the ratio of the squared velocity of your probe to the squared velocity of light times 2 then you require 16% of the mass of the object you're accelerating to be completely converted to energy an that energy to be 100% efficiently converted to momentum. but the 2nd law of thermodynamics applies to ALL processes, so figure about 33% efficiency at best, so 48% of the mass would be required in a process that converts matter 100% to energy - a process that doesn't exist.

Travel to the stars will in a human lifespan remains possible only in science fiction

106 posted on 08/14/2016 9:19:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

You know, as my wife and I were reading the first two books it occurred to me, go back and look, the really good books with great ideas that became reality were Jules Verne and HG Wells 100 years ago and the 50 years ago Bradbury, Assimov, etc. we’re American. So there was a shift from British to American and now we have these books which, of course, borrow heavily from precursors but are updated with current/future technology that gives insight to a brilliant mind. That mind is Chinese.

I am happy for the Chinese but sad to see America relinquishing the role of the world’s culture richest in ideas.


107 posted on 08/14/2016 9:26:15 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Kudos to you if you can delve into the realm of imagination and devolve yourself from the reality of physics on earth.


108 posted on 08/14/2016 9:31:28 AM PDT by entropy12 (The GOPe are either Globalists pushing cheap labor express or are perma-neocons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: PIF

There are people rethinking the whole Venus is terrible theory, using its challenges as benefits. These links gives some examples:

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-we-thinking-about-a-Mars-colony-when-a-Venus-colony-would-be-more-technically-feasible

http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/space-flight/nasa-study-proposes-airships-cloud-cities-for-venus-exploration


109 posted on 08/14/2016 10:11:51 AM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Figured it was something like that. Couldn’t resist.


110 posted on 08/14/2016 10:38:15 AM PDT by disndat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
But in what may prove to be the most exciting find to date, the German weekly Der Spiegel announced recently that astronomers have discovered an Earth like planet orbiting Proxima Centauri, just 4.25 light-years away. Yes, in what is an apparent trifecta, this newly-discovered exoplanet is Earth-like, orbits within it’s sun’s habitable zone, and is within our reach. But is this too good to be true?

4.25 light-years away is a long way. "...unless we make a major breakthrough in the realms of fusion, antimatter, or laser technology, we will either have to be content with exploring our own Solar System, or be forced to accept a very long-term transit strategy…" http://www.universetoday.com/15403/how-long-would-it-take-to-travel-to-the-nearest-star/

111 posted on 08/14/2016 11:20:35 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
Using nuclear propulsion, as proposed fifty years ago, would take less than 50 years. Only relatively modest engineering problems need to be solved, without the development of exotic drive systems or warp speed.

Nuclear Thermal and Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NTP/NEP): Another possibility for interstellar space flight is to use spacecraft equipped with nuclear engines, a concept which NASA has been exploring for decades. In a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) rocket, uranium or deuterium reactions are used to heat liquid hydrogen inside a reactor, turning it into ionized hydrogen gas (plasma), which is then channeled through a rocket nozzle to generate thrust...

However, despite these advantages in fuel-efficiency and specific impulse, the most sophisticated NTP concept has a maximum specific impulse of 5000 seconds (50 kN·s/kg).

...adjusted for a one-way journey to Proxima Centauri, a nuclear rocket would still take centuries to accelerate to the point where it was flying a fraction of the speed of light. It would then require several decades of travel time, followed by many more centuries of deceleration before reaching it destination. All told, were still talking about 1000 years before it reaches its destination. Good for interplanetary missions, not so good for interstellar ones.

Nuclear Pulse Propulsion: Nuclear pulse propulsion is a theoretically possible form of fast space travel...

But of course, there the inevitable downsides to the design. For one, a ship of this size would be incredibly expensive to build. According to estimates produced by Dyson in 1968, an Orion spacecraft that used hydrogen bombs to generate propulsion would weight 400,000 to 4,000,000 metric tons. And at least three quarters of that weight consists of nuclear bombs, where each warhead weights approximately 1 metric ton.

All told, Dyson’s most conservative estimates placed the total cost of building an Orion craft at 367 billion dollars. Adjusted for inflation, that works out to roughly $2.5 trillion dollars – which accounts for over two thirds of the US government’s current annual revenue. Hence, even at its lightest, the craft would be extremely expensive to manufacture.

There’s also the slight problem of all the radiation it generates, not to mention nuclear waste. In fact, it is for this reason that the Project is believed to have been terminated, owing to the passage of the Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963 which sought to limit nuclear testing and stop the excessive release of nuclear fallout into the planet’s atmosphere.

Fusion Rockets: Another possibility within the realm of harnessed nuclear power involves rockets that rely on thermonuclear reactions to generate thrust...

But of course, the project also identified numerous stumbling blocks that made it unfeasible using then-current technology – most of which are still unresolved.

For instance, there is the fact that helium-3 is scare on Earth, which means it would have to be mined elsewhere (most likely on the Moon). Second, the reaction that drives the spacecraft requires that the energy released vastly exceed the energy used to trigger the reaction. And while experiments here on Earth have surpassed the “break-even goal”, we are still a long way away from the kinds of energy needed to power an interstellar spaceship.

Third, there is the cost factor of constructing such a ship. Even by the modest standard of Project Daedalus’ unmanned craft, a fully-fueled craft would weight as much as 60,000 Mt. To put that in perspective, the gross weight of NASA’s SLS is just over 30 Mt, and a single launch comes with a price tag of $5 billion (based on estimates made in 2013).

More: http://www.universetoday.com/15403/how-long-would-it-take-to-travel-to-the-nearest-star/

112 posted on 08/14/2016 11:54:28 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse
In addition to claims of being Earth-sized (which sometimes is really 2X Earth-size) planet and in a “habitable zone,” there are so many other factors which are needed for a planet to sustain life, or even edible life, much less even intelligent life, that a scientific article or report that hypes such a find is usually being dishonest or deceptive or hyping additional grant money from taxpayers’ pockets.

Well said.

113 posted on 08/14/2016 11:56:53 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee
Or just send out bio-arks loaded with frozen ova/sperm/seeds...the crew can be robotic/AI. If the planet turns out to be a bust upon arrival, move on to the next target.

That is far far from what would be necessary. The Incredible Design of the Earth and Our Solar System

114 posted on 08/14/2016 12:09:25 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
I'm not sure where that source got those high figures. This article states that Dyson projected no more expense than went into the Apollo program.

http://www.islandone.org/Propulsion/ProjectOrion.html

The space vehicles themselves should have cost less, since they were to be built “like battleships” without the expensive materials and engineering components required for the Saturn V and associated capsules.

I think the bigger problem, aside from fallout, would be the need to have several generations of space travelers. You'd have to send people in the early twenties with young kids, and commit them and their children's children to the round trip. Perhaps a better approach would be to send a probe, with the ability to send back data by light transmission:

115 posted on 08/14/2016 1:26:31 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

4.25 light-years away is a long way.
...........
agree but given the rate of technological acceleration —its not implausible that even 20 years from now — we’ll have very different and more powerful tech to work with.


116 posted on 08/14/2016 3:21:59 PM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
agree but given the rate of technological acceleration —its not implausible that even 20 years from now — we’ll have very different and more powerful tech to work with.

If judgment and the Lord tarries, but so also would the tech for development on Mars. But far far more is necessary for human life to actually have an alternative to Earth, and we know very little about these "habitable zone" planets. I am interested in investigating Mercuy however, not to live but to know more about the neglected planet.

117 posted on 08/14/2016 5:05:14 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not if we ‘jack one of those gray, almond eyed bitchez rides!


118 posted on 08/14/2016 5:57:55 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Alright - 13,000 light years is still 3000 times further away than Centauri, right?


119 posted on 08/14/2016 7:31:57 PM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I either read about this or watched it on an earthly station just recently! It is so exciting! I want to go to the one in Red Dwarf. You never know, we might find a cat.

Thank you for posting this thread! It really is exciting!


120 posted on 08/15/2016 12:38:11 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson